Author: Sara Palmer

  • Good Friday Sermon: “When God is Silent”

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 8

    Good Friday Sermon: “When God is Silent”

    Timothy W. Sloan

    Humble, Texas

    From noon until three in the afternoon darkness  came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani ?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”). When some of those standing there heard this, they said, “He’s calling Elijah.” Immediately one of them ran and got a sponge. He filled it with wine vinegar, put it on a staff, and offered it to Jesus to drink. The rest said, “Now leave him alone. Let’s see if Elijah comes to save him.” And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit. At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

    – Matthew 27:45-53 NIV

    In the book When God Was Taken Captive: Finding Hope When Heaven Seems Silent, James DeLoach talks about a painting he saw that spoke to him. It was a picture of an old, burned-out mountain shack. All that remained was the chimney … the charred debris of what had been that family’s sole possession. In front of the destroyed home stood an old, grandfatherly looking man dressed only in his underclothes with a small boy clutching a pair of patched overalls. It was evident that the child was crying. Beneath the picture were the words the artist felt the old man was speaking to the boy: “Hush child, God ain’t dead!” DeLoach said that picture of that burned-out mountain shack, that old man, the weeping child, and those words “God ain’t dead” was a reminder that all is not lost as long as God is alive …1 That reminder is not just for him; it’s for you and me, especially when life looks like a heap of rubble and God seems silent. We can trust God’s plans even in silence. The challenge is that we don’t like being alone. Some may say, “That’s not my problem. I like being alone.” And I hear you, but there’s a big difference between being “alone” and “left by yourself.” And when we face adversity, it feels like we’ve been left to struggle by ourselves. It’s not an issue of bearing an unwelcomed weight; it can feel like abandonment when it happens in silence. When it comes to God, silence does not equate to absence. Even when we can’t hear anything, God is always up to something. Our responsibility is to keep trusting even in silence. Our text is the dramatic climax of our Christian faith. Jesus is hung on a wooden cross to die for the sins of lost humanity. And “From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land.” This is less than a week after the procession into Jerusalem when the people waved palm branches before Him, shouting “Hosanna!”


    Page 9

    Blessed is he who comes in the name of The Lord!2 Some of those same people were crying, “Crucify him, crucify him.” It goes to show you that life can get dark quickly. The good news is that we serve a God who shows up in dark situations. I’m not glorifying it. I’m just saying that when you face it, remember that God does some of His best work in the dark. In Genesis chapter one, darkness covered the face of the deep, and that’s when God said, “Let there be light.”3 In Exodus Chapter 10, God caused a plague of darkness to cover Egypt for three days, but the Israelites had light in the places where they lived.4 In Acts chapter sixteen, Paul and Silas were in prison. They decided to hold a worship service at midnight, and God sent an earthquake to set them free. God does some of His best work in the dark. In the dark, “… Jesus cried out in a loud voice, ‘Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?’ (which means ‘My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?’).” This is the only time in scripture when Jesus does not refer to God as “father.” This seems to suggest that, for a moment, His human side felt abandoned. And the verb “forsaken” is not in the perfect tense, which implies that for the last three hours, He had endured the darkness in silence. Some of our greatest battles are not due to physical exhaustion but what happens in our heads due to the silence. We confront the lies because we haven’t heard from God. There’s actually a term for this—it’s called being “ghosted.” It describes someone leaving a relationship abruptly and ending all contact with the other person. Todd Rose, in his book Collective Illusions, writes, “An entire area of our brain … is constantly on the lookout for even the smallest hint of negative judgment.” Rose refers to studies that show a “wounded heart … can hurt just as much as a broken leg.”5 This is not to diminish the pain of Christ on the cross, but it is to suggest that, when we struggle in silence, we want to know, if you love me so much, why won’t you talk to me? And while I don’t have that answer, I do know that God will quiet the noise in our lives while He works things out in our favor. How do we handle the silence? We learn to Deepen our Devotional Life. One of the often-overlooked spiritual disciplines is solitude. It calls us to consciously pull away from everything else in our lives, including other people, to give our … undivided attention to God.6 John the Revelator practiced it when he was banished to the Isle of Patmos and had no choice but to pray and spend time in God’s presence. I know it’s hard to see past solitude as a punishment, but can I push your perspective ? The Bible says, “And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit.” Because there comes a time when we must give up some things to experience others. We want God to bless us first, and then we’ll let go. But it doesn’t work that way. If it happens our way, we’ll be tempted to take credit for what we didn’t do. But when you let go, you’ll discover that God can do what you can’t. Giving up some things allows you to recenter on what’s important, to realize that there’s a bigger plan at work in your life. Contrary to popular opinion, God isn’t concerned with just trying to get you money, cars, and clothes. He wants to get you in His presence. That’s where everything else will be added unto you. It may not make


    Page 10

    Journal for Preachers

    sense now, but the older you get, the more you’ll understand that there are some things that money can’t buy. So, what’s in His presence? In His presence is a peace that surpasses all understanding . In His presence is a joy that the world didn’t give and the world can’t take away. In His presence is the confidence that no weapon formed against you shall prosper. In His presence is the conviction that nothing shall separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Dealing with silence leads us to Deepen our Devotional Life. It also challenges us to Find Hope in our Hardship. It’s easy for us to be consumed with how difficult our circumstances look on the surface. While God may not change our situation immediately , we can find hope in what we’re going through. Everything God allows us to experience has a purpose. And no silence can distance us from Him. In fact, He’ll tear some things up to get us closer to Him. It’s why we all need divine intervention in our lives. And God will do some things a certain way to ensure you know it was Him. The Bible says “At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” The curtain was four inches thick. It was sixty feet high and thirty feet wide. This was not something that could be cut with a pair of scissors. And He tore it from top to bottom, not bottom to top. God wants to ensure that nobody misses the fact that it took divine intervention to bring you through. Not only that, but He goes to great lengths to bring you closer. The veil was between the holy place and the holy of holies, which the high priest went behind only once a year to make atonement for the people. Now that the veil was torn, you don’t need to wait on the high priest. You can go for yourself because God will tear some things up to give us access. There is no limit to the lengths God will go to bring you out. The text says, “The earth shook, the rocks split  and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life.” We want to come out but don’t like the tearing and breaking part. We want our breakthroughs in neat packages. But some things had to be torn and broken to raise you. The reality is that God will perform a miracle to bring us through. And will do it in such a way that everyone who witnessed will know that had it not been for God on your side, there’s no way you would have come through that. This is why when you don’t hear the answer you want, you must go back to your faith files and remember how God brought you out the last time. He breaks things up to bring us out of dead situations. You don’t have to stress out because you didn’t get the answer you wanted. Just trust that God is working behind the scenes to bring you out. In 2006, a storm hit Houston, causing a lot of damage. Trees and power lines were down all over the city. I stayed up late that night to watch the news to determine if we could have church the next day. I was watching KHOU News, and Lisa Faronda interviewed Amy Stout from CenterPoint Energy. Lisa said, “Amy, many of our viewers are suffering from power outages. Can you tell me when they can expect their power to be restored?” I’ll never forget Amy’s answer. She said, “Lisa,


    Page 11

    we’ll be working all night to regain power. So, tell your audience to go to sleep, and when they wake up, their power will be restored.” That’s the hope you need to hold on to today: amid your brokenness and silence, go to sleep and rest, knowing that God is already at work to restore what’s been lost in your life. To raise what’s been destroyed. All you have to do is be still and know that God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in times of trouble!7 Dealing with silence leads us to Deepen our Devotional Life and challenges us to Find Hope in our Hardship. Lastly, it causes us to Commit to Being a Radical Witness. The growth of the church hinges on the witness of believers. But not a mild-mannered, inauthentic, and robotic response. We must be bold and often unconventional when sharing the good news. “They came out of the tombs after Jesus’s resurrection and went into the holy city and appeared to many people.” Because if God goes to great lengths to bring us out, then we should go to great lengths to be witnesses to the world. Not everyone can look at you and tell what you’ve been through. They have no idea the struggles you’ve had to deal with or the difficulties you’ve had to overcome. They may see you in church praising God, but they don’t know what it took for you to get where you are. That’s because God has restored you in grace, so you don’t look like what you’ve been through. If they knew what you had to endure, they would understand why you shout the way you do. If they knew all the traps the enemy set for you that you had to navigate, they would understand why you have difficulty sitting down during praise and worship. If they knew how many times you almost gave up, but God held on to you, maybe they would understand why your praise is so passionate. Being a witness isn’t just about what you say. Some people do know what you’ve been through. So, showing up is a testimony of God’s sustaining power in your life. Your presence is evidence that you can live through your challenges even when it seems like God is silent.

    Notes 1. James DeLoach, Associate Pastor of the Second Baptist Church of Houston, quoted in When God Was Taken Captive, Willard Aldrich (Multnomah, 1989), 24. 2. John 12:13 NIV. 3. Genesis 1:1-3a NIV. 4. Exodus 10:21-23 NIV. 5. Todd Rose, Collective Illusions, (Hachette Book Group, 2022), 35-36. 6. https://www.thenivbible.com/blog/how-to-practice-solitude/ 7. Psalm 46 NIV.

  • The Cross in the Palestinian Context

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 42

    The Cross in the Palestinian Context

    Mitri Raheb

    Chicago, Illinois

    In November 2002, the Church of Sweden approached me, asking if we would have one or two paintings of Christ from a Palestinian perspective. They were preparing an international exhibition for a Swedish audience, titled “The Christ of the World,” showing different paintings of Christ done by African, Asian, Latin American , and other international artists. The exhibition was to have its grand opening in June 2003 at the Cathedral of Uppsala before touring different cities, galleries, and churches in Sweden. The exhibition aimed at presenting the beautiful and colorful world of the Christian church to the Swedes and to say that the Church is neither ethnic nor nationalistic, but rather crosses borders! At the same time, the exhibition was meant to offer a tool to Swedish parishes to work on their own image of Christ. Knowing that one of the missions of our university is to work on a contextual Palestinian Christian art, they approached us hoping that we could help them find and identify two such paintings. When I received this request, I was so excited. This fits perfectly into our mission. But at the same time, Bethlehem had been under a 24-hour curfew for weeks and no one knew when the curfew would be permanently lifted. For those unfamiliar, a 24-hour curfew means house imprisonment. No one is allowed to leave his or her home, neither do children go to school, nor workers go to work, and people cannot even go shopping except for a few hours a week. I immediately called our art coordinator in her home to see what she thought we could do. After some discussions, she suggested that instead of us just choosing one or two paintings, we should rather organize a competition between all interested Palestinian artists and then choose the best out of them. This suggestion was indeed intriguing, but the question was, How could we organize such a competition under curfew? Then we thought, actually, a curfew indeed might be the right time to do this. There were all these Palestinian artists under curfew and house imprisonment. They had time. So why not challenge them to use all their creativity and imagination ? This way they could overcome their depression and imprisonment, and we would not only have one, but many diverse and good paintings of Christ in the Palestinian context. In a way, organizing the competition under such circumstances was an act of creative resistance. On February 6th, all paintings were to be exhibited at our Gallery. The gallery was badly damaged during the April invasion 2002. Yet, with the help of a few organizations and churches, we were able to rebuild them even under the most difficult of circumstances. The exhibition “Christ in the Palestinian Context” was to be the first shown at the reopened gallery. When the opening of the exhibition was advertised,


    Page 43

    the announcement said “4 p.m. on February 6th, if curfew is lifted on that day.” By chance or by divine intervention, the curfew was lifted on that day for a few hours and the opening of the exhibition took place as scheduled. Regardless of the curfew regime, the gallery hosted sixteen Palestinian artists coming from different places all over the West Bank: Nablus, Ramallah, Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Hebron. Some of the artists were well known, while others were still young, beginner artists. What gathered them together was “Christ in the Palestinian Context,” the topic of the exhibition . Each artist searched deeply in the personality and life of Jesus Christ and expressed a part of it in relation to his/her own surroundings. After reviewing all the paintings, I could not believe my eyes. Of all artists participating , sixty percent who submitted paintings were Muslims. For me, this was not the most astonishing factor, since over half of those who attend our programs are usually Muslims. Rather, I was amazed for a different reason. It was interesting to see that so many Muslim artists dared to paint a biblical figure, something that is actually forbidden in traditional Islamic theology and spirituality. More amazing was that all of the Muslim artists, except one, submitted paintings of the crucified Christ. Only one of the Christian artists had the cross as the theme of their painting. I could not stop thinking of the fact that the overwhelming majority of the Muslim painters chose Christ on the cross to represent the context they are living in. We know that in the teachings of Islam, Christ was not crucified. For Christ to be crucified means really nothing else than for God to be on the losing end, and that is impossible in Islam. God is greater than being a loser. Nevertheless, why did these Muslim artists paint Christ, the crucified? I started asking myself, what is this power that lies in the cross that gives so much inspiration to Palestinian artists, both Christians and Muslims? What is the message in the cross that they feel is important for the Palestinian people to hear? What is it that they want to communicate through this image? Why are artists and famous Palestinian Muslim and Christian poets so captured by the cross? The answer is simple: When they thought of their suffering and what is the most meaningful message for them in that circumstance, they could not but think of Christ, the crucified. The cross was for them the best symbol to tell the story of our people. In a God sharing their bitter destiny, they find strength, comfort, and power. The message captured them. It captured their minds and imagination. This story might seem very strange to western Christians who were trained to understand the cross through the lens of substitutionary atonement: Jesus died to pay for our sin; He suffered as a substitute in the place of and on behalf of our fallen humanity; His death made it possible for those who believe in him to be saved. Some have even gone so far as to declare that the bleeding Christ on the cross was the only sacrifice to still God’s wrath, thus achieving retributive justice. No doubt, there are several biblical verses that might be understood supporting an atonement theology. Jesus himself describes his death a “ransom for many” (Mark 10:45; Matt 20:28); Paul uses the term, “sacrifice of atonement” (Rom 3:25); First John writes that God


    Page 44

    sent his son “to be the atoning sacrifice for our sins” (1 John 4:10); and Isaiah 53:4-6 was interpreted by the first church in such a way:

    “Surely he took up our pain and bore our suffering, yet we considered him punished by God, stricken by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

    This Isaiah chapter was the text that the Ethiopian eunuch was reading on the way from Jerusalem to Gaza. When meeting Philip, he asked for a hermeneutical key to reading this text: “Tell me, please, who is the prophet talking about, himself or someone else?” (Acts 8: 34). The early church saw in this chapter a prophecy about Jesus and his death on the cross. But what if Isaiah was not talking about himself nor about Christ, but about the people of Palestine; not about one individual, irrespective who that individual is, but rather about a whole people? A major problem in western theology is that it has individualized and spiritualized scripture. Salvation was understood as something for the individual (for me) and for one’s soul. Western theology has been obsessed with sin. It invented the idea of the original sin and was busy developing codes of conduct to fight sins. German theologians in the 19th century (like Wellhausen) started reading the “servant songs” in Deutero-Isaiah as originally describing the collective “Israel” or the people in Southern Palestine. This text was written after the Babylonian invasion of southern Palestine. The Babylonians devastated the land, destroyed Jerusalem, detained the young people, and sent many of them into exile. After the 587 B. C. catastrophe, the people of southern Palestine were indeed “despised and rejected by mankind.” Their “suffering and pain” (Isaiah 53:3) was unbearable. Such suffering and oppression was a recurring experience of the people of Palestine , irrespective of their religion, ethnicity, or political alignment. This has less to do with the religion of the people and more with the geopolitical location of Palestine. Palestine is a land on a crossroad of three continents. Palestine is a land on the cross. Palestine is a land at the periphery. The prophet Ezekiel understood this well when he described Jerusalem as “in the centers of the nations, with countries all around her” (Ezekiel 5, 5). Indeed, the small strip of land between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River called Palestine became the place where the different magnetic fields


    Page 45

    of the surrounding regional powers would collide. Geo-politically, Palestine is a land on the margins. Situated between different empires, the fertile plains of Palestine often became the most suitable battlefield to keep wars and their tragedies away from the heartland of those empires. Many of the regional wars between empires took place on Palestinian soil. It is no coincidence that Armageddon was envisioned as taking place in the most fertile and largest plain of Palestine. This wasn’t a revealed vision of the end times, but it corresponded to the political reality of the region. Wars constitute reality in Palestine. I know this not merely from history books, but from my own experience. Due to geo-political positioning between powers, Palestine became over and over again an occupied land; occupied by the ancient and modern empires: by Egyptians , Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Crusaders, Ottomans , British, and the Israelis. Sadly, it seems as if Palestine and occupation are synonymous, like Palestine and the cross are synonymous. Not only is Palestine on the cross, but so also, Palestine’s inhabitants are on the cross. The people of Palestine have been occupied, crushed, and oppressed by one empire after the other. It is a distinct and unique challenge to be placed in a buffer— and often—war zone. It is tough to see one’s country a battlefield; to see it divided and torn apart. It is enervating to feel that one’s country and people are occupied not by an equal but by an empire, albeit by proxy. It is not easy to live in Palestine and survive physically and even more, psychologically and emotionally. But this is the context in which the people of Palestine have repeatedly found themselves. This is the context in which the Bible was written. And it is the context Palestinians face today. Throughout history, the people of Palestine have been “marked by the cross.” Palestine and the cross became synonymous. When looking for an identity code for Palestine, nothing is more powerful than the cross. What happened at the times of the prophet Isaiah in 587 B.C. is little compared with what is happening in Gaza today. Israel’s ultimate goal in its assault on Gaza is to make life in the Gaza Strip unlivable. How else can we explain the targeting of Infrastructure (65% of road networks damaged), residential buildings (60% damaged ), commercial facilities (80% damaged), hospitals (90% out of service)? With the destruction of schools (88% damaged) and universities (100% of the universities destroyed, including Dar al-Kalima Campus in Gaza), Israel is committing a scholasticide . With the destruction of most of the major cultural institutions, museums, ancient archeological sites, and Gaza’s cultural heritage sites (206), and places of worship (556 mosques and three churches), Israel is committing a culturicide. Consider the number of Palestinians murdered in Gaza (50,000), missing (10,000), injured (100,000), and displaced (2 million making 80% of the population ). In addition to depriving people of adequate medical assistance, access to adequate shelter, clothing, and hygiene and sanitation, thousands of patients are suffer-


    Page 46

    ing and dying from kidney failure, heart disease, and cancer, dying for lack of access to health care. Thousands are getting polio, hepatitis, and other infections out of lack of vaccines, clean water, and hygiene. Israel is committing a humanicide. In addition to all of this, Israel has been using starvation as a weapon by depriving people of access to adequate food and water and blocking supplies from entering Gaza. In terms of weapons, Israel has dropped close to 100,000 tons of explosives on the Gaza strips, including 2000-pound dumb bombs, equivalent to several nuclear bombs. The assault on Gaza resulted in serious bodily and mental harm that would take decades to heal. All the above policies and practices with its excessive and unproportional use of force amount according to the International Court of Justice to a genocide. Israel’s aim is to make life in Gaza a hell, so that those surviving the genocide will have no choice but to seek refuge somewhere else, thus ethnic cleansing Gaza. This is the cross that Palestine is living on right now. The suffering of the people is unbearable. The assault of Israel on Gaza is not only against Hamas, but against the entire Palestinian population there, a whole population is despised! They are experiencing the state terror of the empire. They have to be the atonement for Europe’s sin against the Jewish people.They have to be the testing ground for the empire’s last AI-operated military inventions. The entire people in Gaza are being “led like a lamb to the slaughter.” Western theologies were obsessed with the sin of the individual rather than the systemic sin. It is the combination of state terror of the Roman Empire and religious establishment of that era that brought Jesus on the cross. The servant who was “cut off from the land of the living” becomes a symbol of the “necropolitics” of all times. In the words of Achille Mbembe, what we experience in Gaza is necropolitics where “weapons are deployed in the interest of maximum destructions of persons and the creation of death-worlds, new and unique forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to conditions of life conferring upon them the status of living dead.” Over the last thirty-five years in ministry, I have come to realize that there is something very deep, something very existential in the cross that connects it to the struggle of our Palestinian people. There is a kind of a correlation that is so profound and intense. Throughout these years and as a Palestinian, I was and am still living under Israeli occupation, feeling the systemic humiliation, segregation, and oppression . Throughout these years, I have been a Pastor who had to climb the pulpit Sunday after Sunday to preach texts from the scripture. I struggled to make sense of what we go through as Palestinians and to give sense to those ancient texts to a small Palestinian Christian community. And, along the way, I started understanding why the climax of the New Testament could not have been any other than Jesus, and him crucified (I Cor. 2: 2). It is


    Page 47

    the suffering and crucified Christ that can best speak to us as an occupied nation in our suffering. It is He, the Palestinian Jew, that was crushed on the cross by the Roman empire, who can best tell our story to the world. It is the cross that can open our eyes to the systemic necropolitics of our time. Jesus died “for the people” so that “the whole nation” is not destroyed (John 11:50). The cross is thus the clearest judgment against the necropolitics of our times. Jesus died “for the people,” for every people, so that they might live and flourish. Every people deserve to have life and life abundant. It is the cross that is followed by resurrection that gives us the strength to resist those necropowers of our time, thus proclaiming an alternative life-giving vision for our world.

  • Sermon: ‘Beyond Babel’

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 23

    Sermon: “Beyond Babel”

    Nii Addo Abrahams

    Madison, Wisconsin

    Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as they migrated from the east, they came upon a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.” And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.” The Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which mortals had built. And the Lord said, “Look, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down, and confuse their language there, so that they will not understand one another’s speech.” So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore it was called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth. Genesis 11:1-9

    Once upon a time, there was a flood. A. This flood, according to the author of Genesis, destroyed “everything on dry land in whose nostrils was the breath of life” (Gen. 7:22). Everyone and everything died—except for one little family, tucked away safely in an ark, and a few non-human creatures they managed to bring along with them. a. When the waters subsided and the survivors left the ark, the earth did not look the same as it did before. If you’ve ever seen before and after pictures of an area that has experienced flooding, you know floodwaters can drastically change a landscape. b. Familiar landmarks were erased. Trusted sites for planting crops and feeding animals could no longer be found. The world which this family once knew no longer existed. c. So as this family slowly grew and spread across the ruined landscape , they were also searching; searching for a place to call home.

    And then, it happened. B. As they made their way through the land of Shinar, they stumbled across a valley they had never seen before.


    Page 24

    a. The soil in the valley was rich, nourished by two great rivers: the Tigris and the Euphrates. It was filled with resources they could use to build homes and craft tools. The valley itself offered natural protection from the elements. b. Suddenly, there was no need to keep searching. Everything they could ever want was right in front of them. It was a chance at a new beginning. c. So they settled there. Their settlement became a village, then a town, and then, finally, a city. And at the center of that city, they set themselves to the task of building something no one had ever built before: a tower, with its top in the heavens.

    Why build such a tower? C. If you’ve heard this story before, you may have heard that it was an act of rebellion against God; an attempt to encroach upon God’s domain in the heavens and eventually overthrow God. Maybe you’ve heard that the tower of Babel was built as a monument to human greatness. a. While that may be possible, I suspect something else was going on. b. If you have the patience to comb through the genealogy of Noah ’s descendants in Genesis 10, you’ll pick up on an interesting tidbit of information. The first king of Babel was a man named Nimrod. Nimrod, son of Cush, son of Ham, son of … Noah. Babel comes just three generations after the flood. c. And while that might seem like quite a gap, consider how, for example, our own family stories—even those from generations past—shape the way we see the world; what we love, what we hate, what we fear. In fact, recent studies in epigenetics are revealing that the physiological impacts of trauma might literally be passed down biologically from generation to generation.1 d. The memory of the flood is fresh for the people of Babel. They are carrying it in their bodies.

    Now, in the wake of the flood, God did promise that no such destruction would come again. And God also reiterated the instructions God had given Adam and Eve in the garden—to go forth, multiply, and fill the earth. D. These instructions were meant for their good. a. God’s plan was always to fill the earth with different and diverse peoples. God’s plan was always for humanity to have different cultures, languages, beliefs, skin colors, sexualities, abilities, and more.


    Page 25

    b. But I imagine that to the people of Babel, these instructions did not sound like good news. I imagine that they sounded like they were being forced to abandon the one thing that they had been able to rely on in the wake of the flood—each other. c. So perhaps these wanderers are not proud. Perhaps they are not rebels. Perhaps they are simply afraid. d. And driven by that fear, the people of Babel decide that rather than trusting God, they will trust in the work of their own hands. They try to build something that will be impervious to the forces of chaos swirling around them. One language, one city, one family, forever.

    All of a sudden, this myth starts to seem a little more real. E. After all, we know something of what it means to live in a chaotic world. a. The list is all too familiar at this point: pandemic, political turmoil , endless war, climate change. Not to mention the chaos that doesn’t make the news; the kind that happens in our families, our homes, our bodies, our souls. b. In a world as unstable and unpredictable as ours, what we want— more than anything—is Babel. We are desperate for certainty and stability. We want to build things that bring the world under our control; towers with their tops in the heavens. c. Throughout our nation’s history, we have seen this impulse play out to horrible and destructive ends. Systems of heteropatriarchy and white supremacy and racial capitalism form the bedrock of this country, each of them built for the sake of bringing the world under the control of a privileged few. d. We are watching people try to build Babel right now, as a wave of new laws and policies criminalize teaching children the truth about our nation’s history and deny trans folks access to gender-affirming healthcare. Unfortunately, these racist and queer-phobic dogwhistles are effective tools for politicians who are interested in maintaining power and control.

    But Babel is not just something that exists *out there.* It is not just something that “those people” are building. F. I have a running joke with some of my close friends from college that my plan for the future is to buy all of the houses on a cul-de-sac so we can be together forever. (In reality, the dream is actually to buy one house, like on Full House, but I’ll compromise.)


    Page 26

    a. But the truth in that joke is that I’m terrified of the unknown. I dream of that cul-de-sac because it means I’ll never have to wonder where I’m going to live, who my friends will be, how my kids will grow up, where I will die. b. And while I have not yet bought up all the houses on a cul-desac (and likely never will, because interest rates are insane and I make pastor money), when I look into my soul, I know that the impulse to build Babel—to seize control of my story, to trust myself rather than God—lives inside of me. c. For me, Babel looks like chasing expertise in everything so I am never surprised by anything. (And in case anyone out there is into the Enneagram, I am a 5, so that tracks.) d. For you, Babel might look like a carefully curated circle of friends who look and think and talk like you. It might look like doing everything you can to avoid vulnerability in your relationships . e. It might look like impulsive spending after every paycheck or a meticulously managed retirement account. f. It might look like unhealthy eating habits, or refusing to go to therapy, or saying “Yes” to every opportunity that comes our way because we are afraid there will never be another.

    Babel comes in so many tantalizing forms. And it is great at giving us what we want—control—but it never gives us what we truly need. G. What we need is abundant life. a. What we need is a life animated by the transformative and creative Spirit of God. What we need is a life beyond Babel, where we are led by God’s Spirit into wonder and mystery and—yes—a little bit of chaos. b. This is why when Pastor Jessica asked if I would preach here on Pentecost Sunday, I jumped at the chance. I love to tell the story of Babel alongside the story of the day of Pentecost from the book of Acts, because Pentecost is all about the chaos. c. I should say here that these two stories mirror each other in several ways. i. Both stories are catalyzed by a world-changing, paradigm -shifting event; in Genesis, it’s the flood, and in Acts, it’s the resurrection. ii. Both stories see groups of people grappling with whether to trust God’s promises. Both stories end with people scattering and speaking in multiple languages.


    Page 27

    iii. It’s no accident that the lectionary pairs these stories together . Some scholars even think the author of Acts has the story of Babel in mind as they are shaping their account of the day of Pentecost.

    But the real reason I love telling these two stories together is because it helps us see what is possible when we are willing to give up control. H. Let me say it again: The day of Pentecost is all about chaos. a. I think we miss how chaotic it was because it’s in the Bible, and the Bible is boring, right? But Pentecost was completely out of control! b. 120 people in a house. Already a recipe for disaster. Then, a mighty wind starts rushing through, and fire appears above everyone ’s heads. I don’t know if you know this, but fire and wind are generally not a good combination. c. Then people start speaking in languages they’ve never learned before. Now we have rushing wind, tongues of fire, and chaotic shouting in other languages. If this was a movie, we would think they were trying to summon a demon. Pure and utter chaos! d. But God is a God who knows how to bring beauty out of chaos. From the very beginning of creation, God has been working in, through, and with chaos. Chaos is no obstacle for God! e. And look at what God makes out of the chaos on Pentecost. Three thousand people joined the Jesus movement that day. The church was born. We are here as heirs of the legacy of this day; a day when God’s people were willing to trust what God was doing, even when things got a bit out of their control.

    When God saw what the people of Babel had built, God saw it for what it truly was: a shrine to the little-g god of control. I. And so God scattered them, sending them out with new tongues to spread out across the world. a. In other words, God turned God’s people toward new life by turning them toward the thing they were most afraid of: uncertainty . b. I wonder if today, God wants to turn us in the same direction. Because where we see uncertainty, God sees opportunities for new life. c. And we do not have to wait for God to descend from on high or for wind and tongues of fire. The Spirit of God is within each of us. And that means that no matter what kind of Babel we have


    Page 28

    built, God is closer than our very breath, waiting for us to trust in her. Right now, God is reaching out God’s hand, inviting us to leave Babel behind. d. Beyond Babel lies a horizon of promise that is offered to us by grace and is guaranteed through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ. It’s a promise that is summed up by that well-worn encouragement that it is God who goes before us and God will never leave us nor forsake us (Deut. 31:6-8; Heb. 13:5). It’s a promise that is—as Paul says in Ephesians—“exceedingly and abundantly more than all we can ask or imagine” (Eph 3:20). I want that promise. Don’t you? e. Friends, I may not know what Babel you have built. And I may not know what it will take for you to leave it. But I do know this: God knows the way out.

    Will you follow?

    Amen.

    Note 1 New avenues in epigenetic research about race: Online activism around reparations for slavery in the United States – Élodie Grossi, 2020.

  • Sermon: “Time to Let Go”

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 26

    Sermon: “Time to Let Go”

    J.C. Austin

    Severna Park, Maryland

    But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb. As she wept, she bent over to look into the tomb…

    – John 20:1-18

    Easter takes awhile to get to where it’s going. We generally forget that; we forget that Easter begins while things are still dark, with Mary in the garden near the tomb, weeping, because she has lost Jesus. Twice, actually; she has lost him once to death, and once to wherever his body has disappeared to. And in some ways, I suspect the second was even more upsetting than the first. It’s bad enough to watch the Roman state punish Jesus with crucifixion for being a threat, but the anxiety of simply not knowing what has happened to him when she found the tomb empty on Sunday morning was probably even worse. You know that recurring nightmare that many parents have about losing track of your child in a crowd? That actually happened to me once. My son Liam was about five years old and we were living in New York City at the time. We were shopping in a place called Chelsea Market, a renovated industrial site in downtown Manhattan with lots of shops, food stalls, and so on. It’s always very crowded, and as we were making our way through the bustling corridor between shops, I glanced down next to me and he wasn’t there. I pivoted to see if he was behind me: there was just another shopper scowling at me for having stopped on a dime as she then brushed past me. “Liam?” I said, pivoting in the other direction, striving not to panic. Nothing . Realizing that he was definitely not near me, it was time to throw caution to the wind: “Liam?!?” I shouted; “Liam, where are you???” I yelled, ignoring the startling looks of people around me who either couldn’t figure out why I was acting that way or knew exactly why I was acting that way. I strode backwards quickly against the stream of shoppers like an icebreaker ship in the Arctic. “Liam?!?!?” I shouted again, and finally I heard him: “Daddy?? Daddy!!” I pushed through a few people and there he was, not far from the window of the last store that we had shopped at, less than ten yards from where I had realized that he wasn’t with me. I ran to him and scooped him up in my arms and held him tight for a long time. After a good while of clinging to each other, I asked him if he was ready for me to put him down. He nodded. “But I’d like to hold your hand the whole time until we get out of here, ok?” I answered, “I want to make sure I never lose you again.” And even though he was a very independent kid, he agreed. I can’t imagine a more natural thing in the world than holding on tightly to someone you love that you had lost but has now returned to you. In every movie or story


    Page 27

    or real-life experience, when someone is reunited with someone they love who has been missing or presumed dead or even just escaped a life-threatening situation, they cling to one another in joy and relief and thanksgiving, often laughing and crying at the same time as they do because of all the different kinds of emotions that they are experiencing simultaneously. And above all of that, they are filled with gratitude that the nightmare that they had been living is over, and that they could finally return to something like normal life, something like whatever they had before, that they intend to hold onto more tightly than ever. All of that makes Jesus’s reaction to Mary Magdalene when she finally recognizes him, telling her not to hold onto him, puzzling. Mary has lost Jesus. When almost everyone one else stayed at a distance or ran away after his arrest, Mary stayed close; when Jesus was being crucified, only Mary Magdalene, one disciple, and Jesus’s mother and aunt remained with him. And here, on Easter morning, Mary comes to Jesus’s tomb before the sun has even come up. But when she arrives, she finds something unexpected: the large stone sealing the tomb had been rolled away. Mary then runs to Peter and “the disciple whom Jesus loved”—in other words, the two most prominent disciples of Jesus other than Mary herself. This is not a joyful errand; Mary does not conclude from the open tomb that Jesus is alive, but rather that someone broke into his tomb and removed his body: “they have taken the Lord out of the tomb,” she tells them, “and we do not know where they have laid him.” Peter and the other disciple run to the tomb to see what Mary is reporting for themselves. They confirm that the tomb is empty, and then they return to their homes, resigned to yet one more loss. But not Mary. Mary doesn’t go home; she stays right where she is, weeping in the garden where Jesus was supposed to be buried. Because if you didn’t go home in resignation, that is what you would probably do, too: stay in the last place that someone you loved had been, weeping over them being lost. That grief is honored by the three persons whom she encounters in the garden, despite them already knowing that Jesus has been raised from the dead. First, she encounters two angels, who immediately ask her, “Why are you weeping?” They don’t ask that in the sense of, “why are you weeping, because you shouldn’t be.” They ask it in the sense of acknowledging her grief as real. And then they don’t try to talk her out of it or explain it away; they let her express her grief and listen with respect and sympathy. So, after receiving that gift from the angels, Mary explains that she is weeping because someone has taken Jesus away and she doesn’t know where. Then she turns and sees Jesus without recognizing him, who echoes the angels in asking why she’s weeping and honoring her grief. Jesus doesn’t pretend like bad things haven ’t happened, or that they don’t matter because everything is ending “happily ever after” because he’s alive again. He gives Mary the opportunity to voice what she is feeling and experiencing, and only then does he call her by name and she realizes who he is and what has happened. It seems like a small thing to trigger such an astonishing recognition: simply saying her name. But calling someone by name is one of the most powerful things


    Page 28

    we can do. You can hear someone calling your name through all kinds of interfering noise, so strong is the response to it. As a child, when you hear your parents call your name loudly and sharply, you can hear it from far away and know that you are in trouble. And when I lost Liam in that market, my immediate response was to call his name over and over again, louder and louder, and to listen for him as the only person in the entire world who calls me “Daddy.” That is how we found one another again: through calling each other’s name, recognizing and finding each other and holding on tight to one another, afraid to let go again. It’s only natural that Mary would have done the same thing. After all, she did not lose Jesus for three minutes in a crowd; she lost him for three days to death itself, and then thought she had lost him again to some tomb robber. She must have done so, because Jesus responds, “Do not hold on to me.” That might sound cold with the wrong tone of voice; an older translation used to simply say, “Don’t touch me,” which sounds incredibly insensitive under the circumstances. But that’s not what Jesus is saying. The Greek word there for “hold on” means to cling, fasten, or grasp; it has the sense of holding something or someone in place, not simply touching them.1 That is still quite understandable on Mary’s part: now that Jesus has shockingly, miraculously returned from the dead, and she wants to hold him there with her, hold on to what she has; the last thing she wants to do is let him go and risk losing him again. Letting go is always a big risk; who knows what will happen next? There’s a wonderful scene about this in the animated film, Finding Nemo, probably my favorite film that Pixar has ever made. The film is set among the creatures of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, and it actually begins with a tragedy: two clownfish have just laid their eggs when a barracuda appears and attacks, knocking the father, named Marlin, unconscious, who awakens to find his wife and all the eggs missing, except one, which he names Nemo. When that one egg hatches, Marlin becomes an extremely over-protective father, constantly terrified of losing Nemo to even the smallest risk. The child clownfish, as you might expect, resents this behavior and breaks the rules one day to swim well away from the reef to explore a speedboat that has anchored nearby, and ends up being captured as a pet by a scuba diver. Marlin, horrified, tries to follow, but the boat of course speeds Nemo away. Thus begins an odyssey of Marlin pursuing clues about Nemo across the ocean with Dory, a well-meaning but addled fish that agrees to help him, through many dangers and adventures to find Nemo, whom they have learned has been taken to Sydney, Australia. At one point, Marlin and Dory get accidentally swallowed by a large whale while it’s feeding. Trapped in its mouth, there seems to be no escape. As time passes, Marlin begins to despair, but Dory claims to be able to “speak whale,” and starts trying to ask their unintended host what’s happening. The whale responds with loud unintelligible noises and then suddenly the water in its mouth starts to drain. Dory claims the whale is saying to move to the back of its throat, and Marlin concludes that it is simply trying to eat them. As the water drains, the two fish teeter on the precipice of the whale’s throat, with Marlin desperately clinging to the whale with


    Page 29

    one fin and Dory with the other, who dangles suspended in the air. The whale says something, and Dory looks at Marlin. “He says it’s time to let go,” she yells; “everything ’s going to be alright!” Marlin stares back at her in terror. “How do you know? How do you know something bad isn’t going to happen?” Dory considers that for a moment. “I don’t!” she finally replies. Marlin looks at her, and then down below her, and then at her again, and for the first time in his life, agrees to let go. They plunge down into the whale … only to be blown up out of its spout to freedom, right outside of Sydney Harbor, exactly where they need to be. They are alive, hope is revived, and the story is far from over. It is that hope and that promise that Jesus is giving to Mary in this moment: he is alive, hope is revived, and the story is far from over. The good news of Easter isn’t that things can finally go back to normal, and that we can keep it that way if we hold onto it tightly enough. The good news of Easter is that what was normal is being remade and redefined into something truly good. Easter is not a happily-ever-after ending; it is a joy-filled and hope-full new beginning. Here in the garden with Mary, Jesus is just getting started. That is why he tells her not to hold on to him; it is time to let go, he says, time to move forward into the promise of abundant life that Jesus came for all of us to have, an abundance that cannot be diminished or curtailed by any power or circumstance on this earth, not even death itself. Jesus has yet more to do, and his followers have more to do with him. That is why he sends Mary forward as the first apostle: the apostle to the apostles, as some Christian traditions call her, because it is she who bears the good news to those who become apostles, and the word apostle simply means, “one who is sent.” And you cannot be sent elsewhere if you are holding on to what you have. But how do we know? How do we know something bad isn’t going to happen? Well … we don’t. The promise of Easter is not that something bad will never happen; no, it is much, much better than that. The promise of Easter is that no matter what happens, there is nothing, nothing in heaven or on earth, that can separate us from God’s love, that can push God out of this world, that can keep the ultimate good— that God is always with us and for us—from happening. Christ’s resurrection does not mean that bad things no longer happen; it means they no longer get the last word. Easter is about Christ coming down into the midst of the world in all its beauty and brokenness, receiving the worst of it through rejection and death, and coming out victorious on the other side. The simple truth is that something bad is happening in the world all the time. But the greater truth is that the seeds of resurrection are sprouting up all around us, which we can see and cultivate and harvest if we let go of trying to hold on to what we have, and embrace what God is giving to us even now: new life, and hope, and steadfast love; more than we need; more than we can hold; more than we can imagine; more than anything can stop or change. Because Christ is risen; he is risen indeed!


    Page 30

    Note 1. Cf. the entry for “απτω” in Liddell and Scott, et. al, A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edition with a Revised Supplement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

  • Sermon: ‘Redistribution: A Righteous Response’

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 2

    Sermon: “Redistribution: A Righteous Response”

    Joseph F. Scrivner

    Tuscaloosa, Alabama

    Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other apostles, “Brothers, what should we do?” Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven , and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you, for your children, and for all who are far away, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to him.” And he testified with many other arguments and exhorted them, saying, “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation.” So those who welcomed his message were baptized, and that day about three thousand persons were added. They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. Awe came upon everyone because many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. And day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved. Acts 2:37-47

    In 1974, the R&B group named The O’Jays gave us the soulful hit, “For the Love of Money.” This song artfully adapts 1 Timothy 6:10 in a rhythmic warning about the pursuit of money. It rightfully observes, “For the love of money, people will lie, Lord, they will cheat. For the love of money, people don’t care who they hurt or beat.” Then it ends with an appropriate challenge: “People! Don’t let money, don’t let money change you!” Hearing that song’s challenge afresh for Pentecost, I wonder if we as Christians in the United States have allowed money to change how we read and hear the words in Acts 2. Our lectionary reading for Pentecost is Acts 2:1-21, yet I wonder if the lectionary contributes to our avoidance of money in that chapter by stopping at verse 21? What if we read the entire chapter? Would we allow the last paragraph to challenge us? When we read in verses 44-45 that the new believers had all things in common because of monetary redistribution, do we quickly dismiss it as a distinctive miracle in the early church, like the tongues of fire in the previous verses? Now, to be sure, there are unique aspects in Acts 2. These first believers are in a specific short-term setting created by their travel to Jerusalem for Pentecost. Still, we should not move too quickly past the fact that monetary redistribution was a


    Page 3

    critical component of the believers’ righteous response on that historic day. In fact, this description of economic exchange as a spiritually inspired expression of faith is simply one iteration of a larger biblical theme. The Bible teaches us that God requires monetary redistribution. We see this in the prophets, when they proclaim that worship without redistribution was worthless. Isaiah 58, for example, condemns religious ritual accompanied by economic oppression: the people’s fast days are exercises in self-absorption and economic exploitation. He exclaims, “Look, you serve your own interest on your fast day and oppress all your workers” (58:3). Like Isaiah, Amos conveys God’s command to cease worship until justice is achieved: “Take away from me the noise of your songs; I will not listen to the melody of your harps. But let justice roll down like water and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream” (5:23-24). Jesus also demands redistribution. In Matthew 25, Jesus specifically identifies himself with those requiring assistance, “Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did it to me” (25:40). In Luke 4, Jesus announces that the good news is for the poor, the captives, the blind, and the oppressed (4:18-19). By employing terms for the economically disadvantaged , Jesus proclaims an economic reversal, echoing his mother’s words from Luke 1, where Mary declares that God “has filled the hungry with good things and sent the rich away empty” (1:53). In Luke 19, Jesus meets a rich tax collector named Zacchaeus. As Jesus prepares to visit his home, Zacchaeus offers half of his wealth for the poor and fourfold restitution to anyone he has defrauded. Apparently, without Jesus even mentioning it, this repentant believer understands monetary redistribution as an indispensable aspect of his faith. In Mark 10, Jesus again requires redistribution, as he directs a rich man to sell his possessions and give to the poor (10:17-22). In response to his disciples’ bewilderment , Jesus elaborates, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God” (10:25). Despite later attempts to alter Jesus’s meaning, he tells us plainly what he intends, “For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible” (10:27). These examples show us that Jesus repeatedly calls for monetary redistribution. Nevertheless, one might still be tempted to say that this emphasis was unique to Jesus’s ministry and not necessarily something that extends to the believer in Christ’s church. Yet, in 2 Corinthians 8, when the apostle Paul asked believers for money to assist the poor, he, too, invokes redistribution. In fact, he is quite explicit. Paul contends that those who have resources should share with those who do not so that there may be equality (8:13-14). He supports this point with a citation from Exodus 16, “The one who had much did not have too much, and the one who had little did not have too little” (8:15).


    Page 4

    Journal for Preachers

    James’s letter is another example of believers being warned about the unjust results of inadequate redistribution. After he warns against sinful favoritism to rich oppressors (2:1-13), James gives a fiery denunciation of the rich who have kept back workers’ wages by fraud. He says that their riches have “rotted,” their clothes are “moth-eaten,” their “gold and silver have rusted,” and they have nourished their hearts “in a day of slaughter” (5:1-6). In Revelation 18, the Roman Empire’s riches are poetically paralleled with sexual immorality to persuasively present them as sinfully secured (18:3, 9). Accordingly, the empire’s wealth stands under divine judgment; it will be instantly snatched away. Kings, merchants, and sailors will then mourn the empire’s economic evisceration. As the author describes this destruction, he utters a command of escape for believers, “Come out of her, my people, so that you do not take part in her sins” (18:4). The persistent presence of monetary redistribution in the Scriptures is undeniable . We see it proclaimed by the prophets. We see it taught by Jesus. We see it emphasized by the apostles. In addition, the biblical authors often contrast wealth and poverty in terms of oppression, justice, and neglect. Isaiah 58 calls out oppression. Amos 5 calls for justice . The least of these in Matthew 25 are neglected. Jesus says in Luke 4 that he is anointed to preach good news to the poor and oppressed. James 2 and 5 refer to the rich as oppressors. Revelation condemns imperial wealth as ill-gotten gain. Surely, these motifs in Scripture require our re-examination of how we read and hear the description of Pentecost in Acts 2. If we truly endeavor to follow the Holy Spirit’s leading, we must not sidestep the message conveyed by monetary redistribution on that holy day. We must repent of our tendency to favor the rich over the poor. We must stand corrected by James 2 when we read Acts 2. Once we honestly acknowledge the importance of monetary redistribution in God’s word, we must also confess the complications involved in applying it in our modern world. How should it be implemented in our congregations? Is it a call for redistribution from one church to another in our denominations? Is it a principle that should be expanded to public policy positions? Is it a guide for how we view taxes in our society? I expect no consensus on these questions, but we should certainly concur that the biblical witness requires that they be asked. Indeed, asking these questions is itself a spiritual exercise. It helps us resist the temptation to be unquestionably overwhelmed by the crass materialism surrounding us. This is all the more important when we remember that the greatest threat to the Christian witness has been unexamined enculturation. Tragically, we know of too many examples of the powerful requiring more of the vulnerable than they do of themselves. We have seen this when believers read Jesus’s demand for self-denial in Mark 8. Instead of slaveholders or segregationists or sexists seeing themselves in Jesus’s call to take up the cross, they applied it to those under their control.


    Page 5

    It is a sure sign of sinful interpretation when the powerful, who could change circumstances , employ the Bible to encourage the vulnerable to endure their oppression in those circumstances. Sadly, we see it again when leaders rationalize our nation’s unmatched combination of wealth and poverty. Repeatedly, the poor are blamed for their conditions and the rich are presented as paragons of virtue. You would think that the Bible’s passages about wealth and justice have been simply deleted. We proceed as if they do not exist. Let us repent of our comfort with self-satisfying rationalizations. Let us re-read all of Acts 2 with fresh eyes. Let us ask one another what it means to obey Paul’s command, “Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of the mind, so that you may discern what is the will of God—what is good and acceptable and perfect” (Romans 12:2). Let us ask that God will stir us by the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. Let us pray with the words of this simple hymn.

    Spirit of the Living God, fall afresh on me. Spirit of the Living God, fall afresh on me. Break me, melt me, mold me, fill me. Spirit of the Living God, Fall afresh on me.

  • Sermon: “Search Party”

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 2

    Sermon: “Search Party”

    Lucinda Perera Isaacs

    West Chester, Ohio

    From that time on, Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and undergo great suffering at the hands of the elders and chief priests and scribes and be killed and on the third day be raised. And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying, “God forbid it, Lord! This must never happen to you.” But he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me, for you are setting your mind not on divine things but on human things.” Then Jesus told his disciples, “If any wish to come after me, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit them if they gain the whole world but forfeit their life? Or what will they give in return for their life? For the Son of Man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay everyone for what has been done. Truly I tell you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” – Matthew 16:21-28

    There was a group of tourists traveling by bus through Iceland. They made a pit stop near Eldgja Canyon National Park. One of the women from the group went inside to change her clothes and freshen up a bit. When she returned to the bus someone told her that a passenger had gone missing . She joined the nearly fifty-person search party for this lost passenger. They looked everywhere and canvassed the landscape. Still, there was no sign of the missing person. The search became more and more intense and frenzied. At 3:00 a.m., just as the Coast Guard was about to join the search, one of the other passengers realized that the woman they were searching for was with them all along. She had just changed her clothes and freshened up. The woman had unwittingly joined her own search party.

    * * *

    Losing yourself is not usually as drastic as joining your own search and rescue party. However, Jesus invites us to lose ourselves. He says, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it.” This is distinct from the first time Jesus called people to follow him: “Follow me and become fishers of people.” Jesus then ministered in Galilee. He preached that the kingdom of God was near. He cured people of diseases and took away stigma. He fed


    Page 3

    thousands. Finally, the disciples got him to admit his identity as Messiah, which must have brought a deep sense of relief to them. The Messiah was going to restore a sense of freedom and peace. And, oh, they would’ve loved to be a part of that. Maybe, they will find themselves important and heroic. Jesus, though, responded by talking about suffering, death, and rising again. This was the first time that Jesus predicted his own death. When Peter tried to stop the conversation, Jesus said, “Lose yourself.”

    * * *

    Once there was a person in New Jersey who wanted to find himself. He was dissatisfied that he didn’t have better opportunities in life to live out his faith. This was in the early 1960s, and he knew a lot about Will Campbell. Will was one of the four people who escorted the Little Rock Nine into Central High School in 1957. He was the only white person present for the founding of the Southern Leadership Christian Conference. Clearly, the man thought, Will could put him to use if he came down south and joined his cause. This man really wanted to find himself. He wanted to make a meaningful life and impact the world. He could be part of a significant social movement to bring about freedom and peace. He thought the best thing to do was to make a phone call and ask how he could help.

    “Where are you now?” Campbell responded to his offer. “I’m at a payphone in Newark,” the man replied. “Oh, interesting,” he said. “Is it one of those glass booths?” “Yes, it is,” said the puzzled man. “Are there any people out there, or are the streets deserted?” “There are lots of people.” “Well, son,” Campbell said, “that’s your ministry. Go to it.”

    Will Campbell’s words were an invitation for the man to lose himself and give up preconceived notions of what it means to live justly and faithfully. This allows him to serve others in his own community and with his own life.

    * * *

    Figuring out what it means to lose yourself can be overwhelming. It is certainly complicated by how this scripture has been used to cause harm. Tragically, people in abusive relationships have been told to “stay” and “bear their cross.” LGBTQ+ folks have been told to “deny themselves” or “repress” who they are. Again, these interpretations are harmful. Feminist theologians have, thankfully, pointed out that pride, despite what the earlier theologians suggested, may not be the root of all sin. For those systemically removed from selfhood because of their identity or social status, what separates them


    Page 4

    from wholeness with God is not pride. Rather, those who have experienced self-loss actually must learn to love themselves and assert their personhood. When Jesus speaks of losing ourselves, he is not speaking of this loss of human dignity. We are all going to hear these words “if any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me” differently—and that is okay. We stand in different phone booths on different streets with different people walking by. We see different needs in the world, and we bring different gifts.

    * * *

    What does it mean to lose yourself? A couple of years ago, students at the University of Chicago heard some contrarian advice at their commencement from commentator David Brooks. The advice pushed against the typical implications that students should “find themselves first and then go off and live their quest.” I’m sure you have heard some version of that speech at some point in your life. Here is what the students heard that day instead: “Most successful young people don’t look inside and then plan a life. They look outside and find a problem, which summons their life. A relative suffers from Alzheimer’s and a young woman feels called to help cure that disease. A young man works under a miserable boss and must develop management skills so his department can function. Another young woman finds herself confronted by an opportunity she never thought of in a job category she never imagined. This wasn’t in her plans, but this is where she can make her contribution. Most people don’t form a self and then lead a life. They are called by a problem, and the self is constructed gradually by their calling … The purpose in life is not to find yourself. It’s to lose yourself.”1

    * * *

    This is true for congregations, too. I am often impressed at how well congregations have been able to identify needs in the world and try to meet them. People here see need and are encouraged to respond with conviction. In this ministry, people are invited to explore their passion—justice work, earth care, radical hospitality, and life-giving worship and music. It is really hard to keep up with everything going on! But the only thing that can hold all of that passion, conviction, and curiosity together is a faith that empowers us to give ourselves away for the life of the world. It’s losing yourself. Many congregations right now are in a pattern of holding everything really tightly . It’s hard to hear this unwelcome call to lose ourselves. Our desire to find ourselves —to hold on to idealized pasts—takes all the oxygen out of the room. It’s the quickest way to lose vitality. But Jesus says those “who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it.” Congregations have become anxious about the future and often grasp things too tightly. This makes it hard to give ourselves away for the life of the world. Instead,


    Page 5

    try losing yourself. Try doing something as a congregation that entrusts yourself to God alone—even at the risk of losing it all.

    * * *

    This invitation to lose ourselves “for Jesus’s sake” is challenging. This is more than losing one’s self for a selfless cause. Rather it is an invitation to relinquish self-centered ambitions, goals, and lifestyles for the way demonstrated by Jesus. Perhaps, it is an invitation to let go of what we hold most uncritically. If we hold ourselves too tightly, it is really hard to give ourselves to the world for Jesus’s sake. Losing ourselves is trusting that when we give ourselves away, we will somehow find more than we ever expected. Losing ourselves is trusting that the life that we give away will always outweigh our fear of the worst. Losing ourselves is trusting that when we give ourselves away, we will come to find new life.

    * * *

    Presbyterian minister and writer Fred Buechner once tried capturing Jesus’s sentiment in his own words: “The life you clutch, hoard, guard, and play safe with is in the end a life worth little to anybody, including yourself, and only a life given away for love’s sake is a life worth living.”2 I also like to apply writing advice from Annie Dillard to faith: “One of the things I know about writing [or, faith, I’d suggest] is this: spend it all, shoot it, play it, lose it, all, right away, every time. Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now.” (Ironically, I almost saved this quote for another sermon!)3

    * * *

    We have all lost ourselves in the way Jesus describes at some point in our life. Maybe, it was an opportunity to serve others. Maybe, it was teaching someone else to play an instrument. Maybe it was parenting—or tutoring—or mentoring—or coaching—or the Peace Corps—or justice work. Whatever it may have been—in that moment where you lose yourself—then you realize that you had never been more yourself. Your anxieties—they dissipate. Your insecurities—they vanish. Your gifts—they flourish. Your idealized notions of who you should be fall apart. The expectations that everyone else has always had for you no longer hold water. You are free to love as you have never loved before. You take a risk that comes more intuitively than you ever expected. Is that what it is like to follow Jesus? Is it that you get so caught up in a life in service to others, that you lose yourself? You get so swept up in sharing God’s redeeming love, that all of your guards are down. Then, suddenly, without any warning , you discover that you are a part of what God is doing in the world. God is using


    Page 6

    us for things we can never imagine on our own. And in that moment, that you are deeply—unequivocally—joyfully—found.

    You are found. Notes

    1. Brooks, David. “It’s Not About You,” New York Times, May 30, 2011. 2. Buechner, Frederick. Wishful Thinking. New York: Harper Collins, 1993 3. Dillard, Annie, The Writing Life. London, Picador, 1990.

  • Move Out / Move In: The cycle of death and resurrection in a college community

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 41

    Move Out / Move In:

    The cycle of death and resurrection

    in a college community

    Trip Porch

    Columbus, Ohio

    I never thought the sight of a dumpster would make me well up with emotion. And yet, each year, it happens. I sit under the stained glass of our large stone cathedral of a church, a monument to the unchanging nature of God, and I see the dumpsters arrive. With them comes a restless procession of beds, desks, and memories crammed into vans and rental trucks. Young faces once brimming with curiosity and the weariness of finals are now hollowed by farewells. The air reeks of sweat, fried takeout, and change. This is what every August looks like here, as the community of college students surrounding our church undergoes its annual changing of the guard. Leases are ending, and the vast majority of our neighbors are moving out. The off-campus student population we’ve come to know over the past year shifts, and with them, the houses they’ve occupied are emptied. Hence the dumpsters—a convenient spot the city provides in order to at least attempt a proper disposal of the sofas and other large furniture (long past their expiration dates) vacating the homes in our neighborhood. Every year, these dumpsters symbolize a sort of death for me. When they appear, it’s a clear indication that the past year is fully and completely over—that those students are gone and what once was won’t be coming back. But their appearance is not some grim reaper; these dumpsters also remind me of something else: that these homes are being emptied in order to soon be filled. They are a reminder that our community is preparing to welcome a whole new population of students who will arrive in just a few short weeks. Yes, it might seem like a strange Easter meditation, but every year these metal containers line the streets like tombstones. Out with the old: broken futons, discarded textbooks, shredded flyers for last semester’s parties. What remains behind is what cannot fit, what is no longer wanted. Amid it all, our church property stands as a refuge in this impermanence, lovingly cared for with a church lawn that includes a hammock garden and painted pews repurposed as garden benches—an offering of love. Yet, it, too, bears witness to the flux. Whatever we build is only briefly held by these young lives. Alongside the sorrow of goodbye, though, is a stubborn hope. It’s the same hope that courses through the Easter story: the hope of what comes next. This is the constant context of ministry in a college setting. Every year brings renewed energy, enthusiasm, and new life as students arrive, but it lives right next


    Page 42

    Journal for Preachers

    to the grief of remembering those you only got to know for a short while. Death and resurrection exist side by side. It feels unique to our context, but it’s really the truth of the world, isn’t it? In Eastertide, we treat resurrection as if it is a state of being we transition into with Jesus once and for all, moving fully out of death and into new life. But here, resurrection feels more like a dance—a seasonal back-and-forth movement between letting go and opening up. Our congregation is small, eclectic, and stubbornly welcoming. Over the years, we’ve forged bonds with students who wandered in, some drawn by music, others by curiosity, and a few by sheer hunger. Some sang in the choir, others joined class discussions, some even helped lead our youth group. Many came just to find solace and community in meals shared in our fellowship hall. For a time, they become woven into our lives. We are their home away from home, the hands that offer shelter, and the voices that lift prayers over their fears and accomplishments. And then the cycle turns again. The university rhythm is relentless, forcing us to hold tightly and then release. There’s a unique grief in loving what will not stay. We hear Jesus weeping at Lazarus’s tomb, knowing all the while that resurrection is near, and yet his tears fall for his friend. To be in ministry here is to hold the weight of goodbyes and keep our arms open anyway. But every September, a miracle happens. The hammocks fill again with fresh faces—students who have never heard our organ or walked through our doors. They bring their own questions, hurts, and need to belong. Slowly, carefully, new relationships form. It’s like planting seeds without any guarantee of harvest, but trusting anyway. Our work as preachers and as a faith community has taught me that resurrection is not a one-and-done event. Easter keeps coming back, demanding that we reimagine hope when the streets seem empty and grief threatens to steal our breath. I’d be remiss not to acknowledge the particularities of this place. The university district is not only transient; it’s unruly. Greek life thrives around us, sometimes so close you’d think our hymns and their house-party bass beats were collaborating. On more than one Ash Wednesday, I’ve stood in the streets offering ashes while next door, beer pong balls hit the pavement. It’s surreal. It’s sacred. And it’s full of potential. These students need resurrection stories, even if they don’t realize it. They need community that can bear their grief and help them hold on to hope at the same time. They need a place where they can sing with generations past, cry without judgment, and eat casseroles and cookies made by grandmas who’ve adopted them as their own. They need us to be the kind of Christians who endure their absence and greet their return. Ultimately, Our resurrection story is not only about loss alone or renewal but about trust. Trust that what we sow—whether through worship or unseen acts of hospitality—doesn’t fade when the faces change. When I think of all the sermons


    Page 43

    Easter 2025

    preached and meals provided, I’m reminded that even as faces come and go, as the seasons ebb and flow, God holds a thread here and is active beneath the surface. In the cycles of grief and hope, our church, like the disciples at the tomb, is learning to hold space for the mystery of what comes next. It’s what makes each new Easter feel like the first: the hope that, against all odds, we will love, serve, and be surprised again. So in this season of death and resurrection, may we sow even when the ground feels rocky. May we sit in grief and lean on the persistent rhythm of resurrection . And if you find yourself in our neighborhood, know there’s a hammock waiting for you, too.

  • A Prayer at the Edges of Morning

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 35

    “A Prayer at the Edges of Morning”

    Julia Watkins

    Davidson, North Carolina

    We have ridden waves of spectacular promise,

    spreading our cloaks,

    singing your praise,

    shouting for salvation.

    We have assimilated along paths that didn’t push back,

    denying any acquaintance,

    calling for crucifixion,

    gawking at death.

    Mesmerized by progress projected against a backdrop

    of desperate longing and all we might have gained,

    we fell straight in step

    with what we wanted

    the movement to be.

    Now it is dark,

    the edges of morning

    barely breaking

    against a horizon

    punctuated by a

    heavy tomb.

    Our ears still ringing with the viral din

    of sanctuaries

    as power brokers,

    as social clubs,

    as status symbols,

    we seek the stillness

    of a garden before dawn,

    where a woman’s voice,

    once barely distinguishable

    in the crowd,

    now echoes alone

    with confusion and grief,

    wonder and hope.


    Page 36

    Journal for Preachers

    So as the sun begins its westward arc, meet us in the cool clearing of all we have lost and all we fear we will, and grant us the courage to linger with what we cannot fathom, no matter how we try,

    that when love intercepts us at the graveside and looks us straight in the eye, we would recognize and remember how clear the calling by name, how urgent the living anew.

  • Tethered to an Appalachian Curse: A Surprise Calling

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 50

    Of Memoirs, Memories, and Missing Pieces

    Paul K Hooker, reviewer

    Braselton, Georgia

    David Brown Howell, Tethered to an Appalachian Curse: A Surprise Calling (Eu­ gene, Oregon: Resource Publications, 2021) 181 pp.

    It happened, I think, when I was five years old. Maybe six. It was a middle Tennessee summer, maybe June or July, hot enough to be in shorts and tee shirts. My family was at some now-forgotten camp and conference center composed of open-air wood-frame cabins connected by dirt paths beneath oaks and pines. I don’t remember how it started, only that I was being chased by an older, bigger boy, heavi­ er and stronger and faster than 1, bent on avenging some offense I can’t remember. Maybe I was just the new kid. I ran into the cabin where we were staying, desperate to escape the beatdown I was sure was coming. The only refuge I could find was a closet—or perhaps it was a wardrobe—^where I hid in hopes of saving myself. I curled into a fetal ball, face close to the laces of my dusty Keds sneakers. But my tormenter found me, despite my efforts at silence and stillness. He ripped open the door of my ersatz sanctum and glared at me. I can still remember his Butch-waxed crew-cut, the tangy smell of his sweat. I remember his left hand grabbing my arm and pulling me out and his right fist punching me—hard—in the stomach. Then he turned and ran out of the cabin. Or did any of this happen at all? Years later, as an adult, I told this story to my fa­ ther. It’s a dream, he said; it never took place. He corrected elements of my so-called memory that conflicted with realities he recalled. And he told me what I had never known: that during the weeks and months prior to my putative beating, my mother had been severely depressed and had threatened to kill herself, my sister, and me. He had taken us along to this camp meeting to ensure that she did nothing of the sort. It was the trauma du jour of our familial life, he said, and my “dream” was the way I coped with it. Maybe, maybe not. I don’t know, and everyone I could ask about this is dead. What I do know is, memory or dream, I have all my life feared the punch in the gut—spiritually, intellectually, financially, as well as physically. David Brown Howell’s memoir. Tethered to an Appalachian Curse: A Surprise Calling, begins with a spiritual punch in the gut. He tells the story of his parents. Jack and Lena, seated on the rough pews of the Bom Again Church in the tiny Appala­ chian hamlet of Boonford, NC, and listening to the fiery oratory of Pastor Leroy. As Pastor Leroy’s sermon rises to its emotional climax in the appeal to come forward and be saved, Lena rises and heads toward the altar. Jack, a hard man accustomed to hard thoughts and harder ways, grabs her and drags her back down the aisle and out of the church. Watching Jack steal his convert, leather-lunged Pastor Leroy delivers himself of a curse: “All the Howells are going to Hell!” There are more Howells


    Page 51

    Lent 2024

    consigned to perdition in that moment than might be obvious: Lena is pregnant with the son she and Jack will name David Brown Howell. Howell’s memoir is the chronicle of his lifelong effort to live under, live with, and ultimately live down Pastor Leroy’s howled invective as his parent fled that Pen­ tecostal altar. Three quarters of the story involve reminiscences—all narrated in first person, present-tense breathlessness—of the pranks and perils that punctuate How­ ell’s upbringing in Boonford, his academic successes in grade school, and his wan­ dering and ultimate self-discovery in college. These stories carry a sort of whimsical air about them, entertaining, sometime thrilling, occasionally embarrassing. More often than not they end with a near-moral, delivered as though by an Appalachian Aesop, reminding the reader that, once again, Howell has escaped a quick and dirty consignment to the netherworld. At the book’s three-quarter mark, after the author’s graduation from college and entry into the working world in Southside ‘Virginia, the tone and diction of the nar­ rative change. Gone is the whimsy, the sense that the author has escaped the inferno by the skin of his teeth. In its place is an adult awareness of the realities of life in the rural South of the 1970s: grinding poverty, economic disparity, ecological collapse, and a racism so deep in the bone no spiritual cleansing will ever wash it away. Howell begins to sense a call through his ministry in a small Southern Baptist congregation, and at the same time to sense that the ministry to which he is called is not a fit for that Baptist congregation. He finds his way to Presbyterianism and the PC(USA). The emerging young adult we meet in these pages begins slowly but steadily to foreshad­ ow the David Brown Howell known to most of liberal Protestantism from the 1990s onward: founding editor of Lectionary Homiletics, convener for more than three decades of the largest homiletics gathering in the world, the Festival of Homiletics, wise psychotherapist and pastoral counselor, seminary faculty member, confidant to some of the most widely read and widely heard preachers of our times. Gone is the mountain boy living under an “Appalachian curse”; in his place is a wise, urbane, thoughtful leader in the field of homiletics and practical theology. As the accolades that cover the opening leaves of the book attest, the brightest and best of those fields find Howell’s stories “engaging; fine,’ 99 66Jinspiring,” and “a rollicking ride.” 99 46.

    At the risk of seeming unappreciative of Howell’s theological journey (I am not), I am left with a question: where is the connective tissue that gets us from the raw-throated threats of eternal damnation and a mountain boy trying to outwit them to a long and faithful ministry under the aegis of a theology founded on grace? How exactly does one accomplish such a transformation? Does Howell internalize and transform the curse, or combat against and overthrow it? How, and when? That, I think, is what is missing in this book. Good memoir writing requires a lot of things, but among them is the sense that there is a central struggle that the author must come to terms with over the arc of the narrative. A memoir is more than a catalogue of episodes, a “this-happened-then-thathappened ” collection of events. A good memoir is the biography of its author’s soul.


    Page 52

    Journal for Preachers

    David Brown Howell is an engaging raconteur. He knows how to tell a story. All the more fascinating to me, then, that he doesn’t deliver on this key task of memoir-writing. His stories about his life in Boonford are tales of close scrapes and narrow escapes, ar­ ranged in chronological but episodic fashion, and capped off with a sort of “see there— beat you again, Leroy” conclusion. Missing is what those scrapes and escapes teach him about the curse and his life both within and beyond it. When he becomes an adult, we see him coming to terms with the vicissitudes of parish leadership, but hardly a word about how Pastor Leroy’s Damoclean curse still hangs over him—if in fact it does—or what it costs him to evade it. Throughout the chapters describing Howell’s stellar career in both psychotherapy and homiletics, the curse makes no appearance and apparently has no bearing whatsoever. Only at the beginning of the last chapter are we told, in an almost off-hand way, that “After a theology class in seminary, I no longer take Pastor ‘Grim Condemner’ Leroy seriously.” A single, matter of fact sentence disposes of this

    95 curse which has dominated his identity and to which he has all his life been “tethered. We are not even permitted to know what words and ideas in that course were so power­ fully liberating. In the end, we know that Howell defeats the curse. We don’t know how he does it, or what it cost him to do so. We—or at least I—don’t know his soul. Which brings me back to that five (six?) year-old boy hiding in the closet. In some respects, he is the image that would hang over any memoir of mine, the way Pastor Leroy’s curse hangs over Howell’s. All the occasions and encounters I have run from in fear of confrontations that would undo me, all the gut punches I have re­ ceived from bullies both figurative and literal that left me with belly- and heartaches, all the closets of mental self-protection I have sought refuge in only to be rousted and routed, even all the times I have dried my tears and steadied my heart and gone back out in the sunlight where both bullies and buddies were waiting—all this would have been part of that story, in much the same way as Howell’s escapes and escapades are part of his. But in addition, what I hope I would do is ruminate on what the weal and woe of my experience has cost me, as well as what it has taught me about fear and self-confidence. If I were writing that memoir, I would want to leave a trail that others could follow, one that limns the soul’s path from hiding to hope. That’s what I wish Howell’s memoir had done. David Brown Howell’s Tethered to An Appalachian Curse has a powerful and evocative core image. It has a long series of entertaining and well-told episodes from a life few who don’t hail from the hollers of Appalachia can imagine. It begins in curse and ends in grace. It is missing, however, the ruminations that illumine the meaning of both curse and grace. It is missing what he learned from the experience of living with that curse and accepting that grace. Those learnings would light the way, not only for Howell but also for others of us who live under the curses of racial, sexual, gender, economic, and societal prejudice. The path out of the curse and to­ ward the grace needs signs to mark the way, like blazes on the trunks of trees beside a trail through an Appalachian forest. I would like to have followed those blazes. I would like to have read that book.

  • The Great Dechurching: Who’s Leaving, Why Are They Going, and What Will It Take to Bring Them Back?

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 50

    Book Review of The Great Dechurching

    Katie Nakamura Rengers

    Birmingham, Alabama

    The Great Dechurching: Who s Leaving, Why Are They Going, and What Will it Take to Bring Them Back? by Jim Davis, Michael Graham, and Ryan R Burge. (Zondervan , 2023.)

    Some months ago, I had lunch with “Stuart,” whom I hadn’t seen at church in over six months. “I don’t want you guys to think this has anything to do with the church,” he tried to reassure me. “You guys are fine, you’re great. This is about us. It’s just so hard with work and kids and school during the week, then every Saturday is taken up with dance and art class, and by Sunday we have this heaping pile of laundry and dishes to do so we can be ready to start everything over again on Mon­ day morning.” Sound familiar, anyone? It was a handful of conversations like this that compelled me to pre-order a copy of The Great Dechurching by Jim Davis, Michael Graham, and Ryan Burge—a book I’d seen referenced in sources from the Neve York Times to The Atlantic to The Christian Post. The book opens:

    In the United States, we are currently experiencing the largest and fastest religious shift in the history of our country, as tens of millions of formerly regular Christian worshipers nationwide have decided they no longer desire to attend church at all.

    According to Davis, Graham, and Burge, my parishioners might belong to the “casually dechurched” category: people whose weekly rhythms have changed due to the birth of children, Covid, work, a move, etc. They are distinct from people who no longer attend church because of some wounding that has pushed them away from church and/or Christian faith altogether. Rather, as the societal pressure to attend church (and even to identify as Christian) ebbs, it is becoming easier for people to prioritize other activities and relationships at times that, in days gone by, might have been reserved for communal practices of faith. The Great Dechurching stands out from other books I have read recently on the changing dynamics of American religion. The authors partnered with reputable social scientists to collect more expansive, reliable, and analyzable data than can be gleaned simply through personal anecdotes (such as mine about Stuart). However, they also present profiles of the dechurched, telling stories of what is happening in the lives and hearts of people who have stopped participating in a faith community. In this way, the book gives both a sense of having responsibly collected real and


    Page 51

    Easter 2024

    relevant data across denominations and of caring deeply about what these trends mean for those of us who are trying to pastor through the “largest and fastest reli­ gious shift in the history of our country.” The authors talk about what might be at stake long term due to mass dechurching, including the loss of churches as places of goodwill in our neighborhoods and the worrisome rise of a secular political Right. What you will not find in The Great Dechurching is a litany of best practices for making your church more attractive to consumers. There is no advice on making church more “seeker-friendly,” improving the music, installing better signage, or hiring a more dynamic youth pastor. Rather, Davis, Graham, and Burge emphasize there is a far deeper need for relationship and personal invitation:

    “If there is one single application from our research that you walk away v/ith, please let it be this: invite your dechurched friends back to a healthy church with you. But unlike a simple nudge to go back to the gym, we would do well to open the doors of our homes and chairs at our table. We aren ’t just telling them they should go back to church; we are inviting them into our lives, which includes church.” (p. 123)

    A significant challenge for this idea of hospitality, however, is that the data re­ veals a clear correlation between socio-economic class and dechurching. Poorer Americans are leaving organized religion behind at the highest rates. The authors postulate that American institutions in general, including churches, tend to work best for people who successfully follow a particular life sequence. The authors share their strong opinion that churches must look critically at how we show hospitality, share friendship, and offer real belonging to people who are single or of lower income and/ or education levels. In their last chapter, Davis, Graham, and Burge attempt to help church-going Christians understand the change around them through a spiritual lens. Amid the reli­ gious shift underway, one of the most poignant experiences for American Christians will be the loss of (or at least decrease in) the levels of power and influence they have enjoyed over the last century. The authors describe this as a kind of “Exile,” and lift up the self-knowledge, discipleship, and generosity that such a period in the life of the American church might bring. Of course, others are describing this same moment more disparagingly, often in terms of “decolonizing” an American church that has often done great harm by favoring the wealthy and privileged. But I do appreciate the addition of these authors’ more gentle approach, which is to name the pastoring and “discipling people through the loss of power” that must happen—even along­ side prophetic critique of the church’s complicity in colonialism and other types of oppression. I read The Great Dechurching alongside a book group of clergy friends, most who serve in The Episcopal Church. The book was written by evangelicals and is mostly about evangelicals (though some of the research did look at dechurched


    Page 52

    Journal for Preachers

    mainline Christians and Roman Catholics), but its message of struggle and hope— when adjusted for different theological traditions—feels descriptive of what the vast majority of Christian institutions are facing in terms of declining membership and participation. The most challenging questions raised by this book in my study group were: What does it mean to “bring them back [to church]? ” And, should we even be trying to bring them back? Perhaps intentionally, Davis, Graham, and Burge do not spend much time defining what it means to be “churched.” For example, is regularly attend­ ing a Sunday worship service the most important practice of being “churched?” Is someone who does not (or cannot) attend Sunday worship, yet maintains other faith practices, necessarily outside of the church? Also, while the authors mention the reality of “dechurched casualties” (people who have been irreparably wounded by or disillusioned with church), this book does not focus on that experience. They enter the conversation with the assumption that the church is inherently a worthwhile thing to be part of. Most members of our book group were much more critical. They expressed a lack of confidence that what many of our institutions currently offer (Eurocentric traditions, systematically racist struc­ tures, communities that aren’t as welcoming as they purport to be) are really worth coming back to. I found The Great Dechurching to be, ultimately, a hopeful book. It is helpful to know that the patterns we are seeing are part of a much larger phenomenon—not solely due to our particular congregation’s inadequacies and failures. Yet God is at work, in the hearts of people who are saying “no” to the church as it currently is, and in the pastoral leadership of those who are called to guide God’s people through this time of uncertainty and into something new. The Great Dechurching gives me more compassion, and more hope, for both.