Author: Sara Palmer

  • Protagonist Corner: An Old Preacher’s Easter Prayer for His Young Colleagues

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 47

    Protagonist Corner

    An Old Preacher’s Easter Prayer for His Young Colleagues

    James S. Lowry

    Hendersonville, North Carolina

    Note: The last of my “Old Preacher Prayers” to be included in the pages of this journal was from a collection of my private devotional prayers that were not written to be read by anyone other than me. This one, like the other, is published at the request of the editor. Unlike the previous one, however, the present offering is written specifi cally as intercessory for my young colleagues in ministry. Easter blessings, friends known and unknown. Thank you for your faithful ministry and bold proclamation. JSL

    God who sprinkles the night sky with stars, numbers each one, and calls it by name; God who selects a handful of stars and sets planets around them to spin; God who on one such planet teaches song birds to sing, blows breath into human beings, calls preachers to preach, and, by your Word living and spoken, teaches them to teach us how to love and be loving. Word of God, who from before creation was seated at the right hand of God, who once in time while on the road to destiny taught and healed, spoke, and fed, and who on Calvary’s slope died to live so that we might live… live to sing for you alleluia once again; Word of God, who sits now in Spirit and Truth beside me just here in a cane bottom chair listening to this old preacher’s prayer,

    (You smell like a refugee, you know, too long without a shower walking long on a stony road; or is that the odor of an alien looking for a home?):

    Easter’s coming, Word of God, and I’ve come to pray for my young colleagues, women and men called by you, fellow travelers, pilgrims, along the way.


    Page 48

    Journal for Preachers At my age almost all of them are young, very young indeed, or so they surely seem to me. Some of my young friends are all full of spit and vinegar, confi dent in what they believe, ready in joyful confi dence to declare Easter’s hope and truth. Others are plagued with secret doubts that by seasons come and go when the church must hold the faith in trust for them.

    Most of them are somewhere between.

    Give them every one and give them all strong grace and clearing thoughts as they pour again over the stories of your rising, savored and passed from generations past, parsing every nuance and verb to gather the truth of Easter’s hope . to be proclaimed in accents bold to your waiting people longing for truth… your yearning people and theirs hungering and thirsting for righteousness.

    The world just now, as always and ever before, needs to hear the Easter story: Refugees are clamoring at fences and borders; White supremacists are spewing their fear and venom. Masses of people are believing lies and half truths. Governments are teetering and governments are falling. Children from gunshots in the streets are dying. The good earth by place is awash or afi re, parched or melting. Our leaders are, by case, too vocal or too silent while my young colleagues just now are wondering what on earth this Easter they should be saying.

    So help the young preachers to know for sure you are as surely with them as you are at my elbow now…


    Page 49

    there as here to cheer them on and in the end to say to them again, “Good job, well done, fellow travelers, servants, and friends.”

    My fi rst thought, Word of God Most Holy, is to suggest you take a shower before Easter morn; but my second thought is better by far. Perhaps it’ll be a good thing if you attend Easter worship just as you are. Among the lilies your people will whisper, “ Is that an alien I smell… an alien from Main Street or some foreign land or a refugee or someone else named as the least of these?”

    “Yes,” the young preachers will say. “What you smell among the lilies today is an alien who has at last found a home… found a home right here… right here sitting on the pew next to you…

    at home at last… at last and at least on this glad Easter day alive and well as you can see.”

    Then with a gentle elbow nudge, Holy Son of God, prod the young preachers one and all to say,

    “Let the church stand and sing, Christ the Lord is risen today. Alleluia!”

    Amen.

  • What Kind of Historian: A Tribute to Erskine Clarke

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 9

    of Historian: A Tribute to Erskine

    William Yoo

    Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia

    In the preface of Dyvelling Place: A Plantation Epic, Erskine Clarke explains what he believes is necessary to write a good history book. I paid close attention when I first read these words several years ago and begin my tribute sharing his wisdom: “Any history, of course, involves not only intense research and analysis but also an act of imagination as the ‘facts’ of research are arranged and interpreted in the mind of the historian.” In addition to finding the relevant primary sources and strenu­ ously poring over hundreds, if not thousands, of diaries, letters, and other documents, Clarke finds that it is important for historians to ask penetrating questions when seeking to engage the past and understand the actions, beliefs, and motivations of the persons and communities we choose to chronicle and interpret. Even when historians successfully compile the documents we need, there is a distance between the past worlds represented in the written records before us and the present day in which we historians reside. In Dwelling Place, one of Clarke’s questions revolves around how the lives of both white enslavers and enslaved Black persons were “linked and inter­ woven by the power of slavery and by the responses of particular men and women to that power.’” Clarke has powerfully demonstrated throughout his long and illustrious career what happens when a historian asks hard questions and answers them with clarity, depth, nuance, and vigor. What kind of historian is Erskine Clarke? I surmise that no one tribute alone can fully capture Clarke’s brilliance and his scholarly contributions in the field of Amer­ ican religious history. But allow me to offer three insights that illumine Clarke’s significance as a historian. Firstly, I believe Clarke is a historian who has engaged serious subjects and weighty matters. Clarke has unflinchingly delved into the his­ tories of slavery, segregation, and racial discrimination. In doing so, Clarke invites his readers into a past marked by complexity and abounding in contradictions. For example, Clarke limns sophisticated narratives of southern white Presbyterians from the nineteenth century, including pastors such as Charles Colcock Jones and mission­ ary couples such as Leighton and Jane Wilson, that illustrate their deep commitments to Christian ministry and their affection for both the white and Black persons they encountered in their lives as well as their support of evil and racist systems that en­ slaved, oppressed, and brutalized millions of Africans and African Americans. Secondly, Clarke is a historian who knows how to write compelling stories. Here is a secret that is widespread within the theological academy: a substantial number of professors do not write well. A person with a PhD has a distinguished record of com­ prehension in a given field and especially knows a lot about the scholarship related to one’s dissertation, but the degree does not require one to be a skilled writer. (Trust

    Advent 2022


    Page 10

    me, there are scores of dissertations that prove my point.) But Clarke is the rare historian who is as gifted with his prose as with his research. Clarke presents richly textured narratives and stunning reconstructions of the past such that his readers can feel the yearnings for freedom within Lizzy Jones, an enslaved Black woman, and witness how enslaved families endeavored to maintain their dignity and sustain hope in a world filled with terrible racial trauma, sexual violence, and family separation. Clarke is the kind of historian who writes books that elicit intricate discussion of his work in scholarly guilds and evoke the full gamut of human emotions in his readers. Finally, Clarke is a Christian historian. This is simultaneously an obvious and complicated statement. Perhaps my observation is most clearly and plainly seen at two levels. Clarke is a Christian historian because he has devoted his scholarly career to examining the many forms and theologies of Christianity as expressed and prac­ ticed in white and Black communities. Clarke is also a Christian historian because his own faith commitments have inspired his pursuit of grace and truth. Clarke writes honest histories that do not obscure the sinful realities and painful contradictions of the Christian past. Rather, Clarke is the kind of historian who takes the call to discipleship seriously and confronts the failures of white Christians in slavery and segregation. At the end of To Count Our Days: A History of Columbia Theological Seminary, Clarke asks whether the seminary’s history, ‘‘with all its revelations about the human capacity for self-deception and about faith struggling to be faithful,” can be a “great resource for Columbia’s engagement in the Missio Dei in the twenty-first century.”^ This is a challenging question that defies an easy, ready-made solution. And at least one answer raises a host of other vexing questions for faithful Christians. What if some readers of Clarke’s history of the seminary ultimately discern that Co­ lumbia’s past is an impediment to be dismantled and nothing more? It is certainly a testament to Clarke’s scholarship that every Christian reader of his work encounters stories of compromise, courage, despair, and hope. Erskine Clarke is a marvelous historian, but a more precise description of Clarke is that he deserves acclaim as one of the finest historians today, if not ever. If my tribute has failed to convince you, all you need to do is read one of his books.

    Notes

    ’ Erskine Clarke, Dyvelling Place: A Plantation Epic (New Haven and London: Yale Uni­ versity Press, 2005), x-xi.

    2 Erskine Clarke, To Count Our Days: A History of Columbia Theological Seminary (Co­ lumbia: The University of South Carolina Press, 2019), 292.

    Journal for Preachers

  • When the Music Starts Again

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 36

    When the Music Starts Again

    Walter Brueggemann

    Traverse City, Michigan

    Any family or communal festive occasion can become a “sign” or a marker. It could be a graduation, a birthday, a funeral, or a reunion. But let us consider a wedding …a wedding as a “sign” or a marker of social, historical signifi cance. This is how it was for the ancient prophet Jeremiah as he watched his beloved Jerusalem sink into misery. He must have thought, “Let us consider a wedding as a signifi cant social, historical marker and sign.” As he thought that, he noticed that weddings in the city had stopped. There were no more weddings in Jerusalem! He took the cessation of weddings to be, on the one hand, a sign of God’s active sovereignty, and on the other hand, a measure of the dislocation that the city must face in time to come. The book of Jeremiah has the prophet comment on the matter of weddings three times (though it could be that the three citations are editorial reiteration). At the end of his “temple sermon” (Jeremiah 7) in which he anticipates the gruesome sight of many dead bodies piled up (7:32-33), Jeremiah concludes: “And I will bring an end to the sound of mirth and gladness, the voice of the bride and bridegroom in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; for the land shall become a waste” (v. 34). There will be no singing, no dancing, no laughter, no celebration. All weddings will be ended, a sign that the city will end in “waste.” In that “sermon,” it is anticipated that the end of weddings comes about, according to the prophet, because of a systemic violation of Torah, a contradiction of the purpose of God: “Will you steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, make offerings to Baal, and go after other gods that you have not known, and then come and stand before me in this house” (vv. 9-10)? The shame of such violation is compounded by the fact that after such systemic violation , the perpetrators come piously to the temple and imagine that they are “safe and secure from all alarms,” hiding like a “den of robbers” (vv. 10-11). The point is a second time articulated in Jeremiah 16. In that prose passage, the prophet anticipates a wholesale devastation of the city. God declares: “Do not enter the house of mourning, or go to lament or bemoan them; for I have taken away my peace from this people, says the Lord, my steadfast love and mercy. Both great and small shall die in this land” (vv. 5-6). The city cannot and will not prosper without the divine gift of peace, steadfast love, and mercy. After a devastating portrayal of massive death, the cessation of weddings is a measure of the trouble to come: “I am going to ban from this place, in your days and before your eyes, the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride” (v. 9). In response to this verdict, the prophet has his people wonder why such trouble has come upon their city: “They will say to you, ‘Why has the Lord pronounced all this great evil against us? What is our iniquity? What is the sin that we have committed against the Lord our God’” (v. 10)? And the prophetic response is: “It is because your ancestors have forsaken me, says the Lord, and have gone after other gods and have served and worshipped them, and have forsaken me and have not kept my law; and because you have behaved worse


    Page 37

    than your ancestors, for here you are, every one of you, following your stubborn evil will, refusing to listen to me” (vv. 11-12). The theme is reiterated a third time in Jeremiah 25. In this version the point is made more specifi c with reference to the coming of the Babylonian army of Nebuchadnezzar who will utterly destroy the city and reduce it to shame and humiliation. The prohibition of weddings is linked to a climactic assertion of ruin and waste at the hand of the Babylonians:

    I am going to send all of the tribes of the north, says the Lord, even King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, my servant, and I will bring them against this land and its inhabitants, and against all the nations around; I will utterly destroy them, and make them an object of horror and hissing, and an everlasting disgrace. And I will banish from them the sound of mirth and the sound of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, the sound of the millstones and the light of the lamp. This whole land shall become a ruin and a waste, and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years (vv. 9-11).

    It will be evident that this prophetic tirade does not hesitate or blink at the direct linkage between historical eventuality and divine governance. In all three usages, the cause of cessation of weddings is divine agency: “I will bring an end” (7:34); “I am going to banish” (16:9); “I will banish” (25:10). I call attention to this because this is a direct linkage that most of us would not make and almost none of us would want to make. We do not readily imagine God’s governance to be so direct, nor do we consider that the God of covenant would so willfully cause the suffering and death of God’s own people. (The reader may notice that in my little book, Virus as Summons to Faith, I have given careful nuance to this diffi cult matter.) It is nonetheless important for us to notice (and perhaps fl inch) that the prophetic tradition has no such caution in making that direct claim for governance. This lack of reticence on the part of the tradition may give us some nerve and courage to imagine what it is like to live in a world where the purposes of God cannot be mocked with impunity. In the end God will not be mocked, not by our wealth, not by our wisdom, and not by our power. The weddings stopped. The music was silenced. The laughter ceased. Historical circumstance was too sobering. Social reality was too devastating. The songs stuck in our throats. Our feet were unmoving on the fl oor. Maybe there were weddings, but no glad sounds. Or maybe not at all, because lived reality had sunk deeply into an unmanageable pause. Such poetic extremity as these verses of Jeremiah might give us an angle of vision on our social “shut down” amid the pandemic. Among us it is as though the celebration has stopped, that singing has silenced and the dancing is paralyzed. Weddings have been delayed, family reunions postponed, churches vacated, schools hit and miss on-line and in person, and cinemas are darkened, sports events are without fans. Social life, social interaction, and social possibility all have come to a halt (except for some daring super-spreaders!). The pandemic is reason enough as an explanation for the silencing shut down. We do not need to look further for an explanation. The prophetic tradition, daring otherwise, pushes back further to the sovereignty of God who occupies active verbs like “banish” and “bring to an end.” We would not


    Page 38

    push that far for an explanation; the silencing, nonetheless, is a stunning reminder of how unmistakably penultimate we are in managing the mysterious givens of our common life. Such an awareness of our penultimacy at least lets us resonate with the texts of Jeremiah. As we study the rising numbers of cases and deaths daily among us, we can draw close to the imagery of Jeremiah 7:32-33, of corpses piled up for bird food; in our case, refrigerated trucks are outside hospitals with many beloved bodies therein. As we stay safe in self-quarantine, we can weave into the urgency of Jeremiah 16:7-8 with no “cup of consolation” to drink and the avoidance of “the house of feasting.” As we notice that our number of cases and deaths is even worse than that of Brazil, we can expect that the United States is something of an object of “horror and hissing” among the nations (see 25:9). And if Donald Trump would have his way, he would readily cast “China” in the role of Babylon who will “lay waste the whole land” (25:9-11). Of course this is all an over-reading of Jeremiah. It nonetheless gives us pause as we read the old text that we claim to be “revelatory.” What is “revealed” is that in and through the pandemic via this poetry is the truth that the world operates on a scale, at a pace, and in a texture other than one of our choosing. It is the singular work of poets, ancient and contemporary, to summon us into this mystery that is beyond our explanation or management. We begin with the obvious: the cessation of weddings. From that we work deeply into the mystery of our helplessness and our extensive efforts to “stay safe.” After these three instances of silenced weddings in Jeremiah, it may surprise and amaze us in a most welcome way that the prophet offers, eventually, a fourth usage of the imagery of a wedding in Jeremiah 33. That usage occurs in a chapter that is fi lled with the restorative promises of God. In verses 1-9, we are offered a sweeping promise of recovery, healing, prosperity, security, and cleansing: “I am going to bring it recovery and healing; I will heal them and reveal to them abundance of prosperity and security. I will restore the fortunes of Judah and the fortunes of Israel, and rebuild them as they were at fi rst. I will cleanse them from all their guilt of their sin against me, and I will forgive all the guilt of their sin and rebellion against me” (vv. 6-7). In verses 12-13 we get a vision of a restored environment with viable agriculture in every part of the land: “In the towns of the hill country, of the Shephelah, and of the Negev, in the land of Benjamin, the places around Jerusalem, and in the towns of Judah, fl ocks shall again pass under the hand of the one who counts them, says the Lord” (v. 13). In verses 14-22 it is promised that the Davidic line will be continued and restored, as certain as is God’s covenant with day and night: “If any of you could break my covenant with the day and my covenant with the night, so that day and night would not come at their appointed time, only then could my covenant with my servant David be broken, so that he would not have a son to reign on his throne “(vv. 20-1). The chapter concludes with reassurance about God’s most elemental promise, the one made to the offspring of Abraham: “Only if I had not established my covenant with day and night and the ordinances of heaven and earth, would I reject the offspring of Jacob and my servant David and not choose any of his descendants as rulers over the offspring of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For I will restore their fortunes, and will have mercy on them “(vv. 25-26). This chapter mentions every possible dimension of God’s commitment to Israel. It affi rms that God is the keeper of every such promise. And right in the midst of this overwhelming collage of promises is our theme:


    Page 39

    “There shall once more be heard the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, the voices of those who sing, as they bring thank offerings to the house of the Lord” (33:11). Weddings will begin again! Life will be resumed in all its joy. Churches will be opened. Sports will be on offer. Cinemas will be available. Social life and social possibility are at hand! In response to this renewal and restoration grounded in God’s goodness, Israel will bring thank offerings. These offerings consist in generous material returns to the God of all goodness. And like all good thank offerings, these offerings are accompanied by words of acknowledgement, explaining why the generous gratitude of Israel: “Give thanks to the Lord of hosts, for the Lord is good, for his steadfast love endures forever “(v. 11). For a time God’s steadfast love had been absent in Israel (see 16:5). But not now! In the liturgic tradition of Israel, thank offerings are a glad recognition that God is good. Beyond that, God’s abiding tenacious fi delity has persisted in and through the trouble, that is, in and through the pandemic. And then, as if to seal the deal, the text in verse 11 adds the great tag-word of rehabilitation: “Restore the fortunes.” The promise is for return to something like normal, the measure of which is the singing, dancing, and laughter of wedding joy that every time is bet upon the future. It is no wonder that Jesus, in the wake of Jeremiah, appeals to the same imagery of wedding, bride, and bridegroom for the arrival of God’s new future (Matthew 25:1-13). These four uses of the imagery of a wedding in Jeremiah—three negative and one positive—provide a screen through which to reread and reimagine our own pandemic with its shut-down and its awaited reopening. Beyond that, the imagery takes up this most treasured social practice of a wedding and lets it be a vehicle for articulation of God’s steadfast love. The silence and restoration of wedding singing and dancing bespeak a regular feature of Israel’s covenant faith, a faith practiced in exile and homecoming, a faith that in Christian parlance is refl ected in the shut-down of Good Friday and the opening of new life on Easter. Judaism, and we Christians in its wake, can gladly attest: “Weeping may linger for the night, but joy comes in the morning “(Psalm 30:5). The fi rst two lines of this verse are awkward for us, because we do not readily speak of God’s anger. But the Psalmist will give it voice: “For his anger is for a moment; his favor is for a lifetime” (Psalm 30:5). The accent is on God’s favor…for a lifetime, a very long time! There is, however, no denying the intense alienation from us that God knows. This is very hard to voice; we nonetheless observe it enacted in our empty social calendars.

  • Zoom Fatigue?: Not in Ministry!

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 53

    Zoom Fatigue? Not in Ministry!

    Damon P. Williams

    Providence Missionary Baptist Church, Atlanta, Georgia

    Imagine if Jeremiah was forced to do ministry during a coronavirus pandemic. How would he lament to an unfaithful generation that was already Zoom fatigued from school/work? Further, how would he lament a generation of some seniors that were initially skeptical, even fearful, of Zoom and many other digital technologies. Oh how Jeremiah would have complained that God was his adversary by providing him such diffi cult circumstances to minister in. In Bible study or committee meetings, every time someone attempted to speak but was on mute, I can see Jeremiah throwing his hands in the air proclaiming, “My soul is bereft of peace; I have forgotten what happiness is” (Lamentations 3:17 NRSV). During worship recordings or streamings, each time the computers failed, cameras didn’t work, or mics weren’t working, he would cry out to others about God, “He has made my teeth grind on gravel, and made me cower in ashes” (Lamentations 3:16 NRSV) as he waited for the technology to be fixed. As more and more members, particularly entrepreneurs, experienced financial hardship from lack of customers, or furloughs or laid offs and the finance committee told Jeremiah of the downward giving trend from “this time last year,” pre-COVID, he would declare, “Gone is my glory, and all that I had hoped for from the LORD (Lamentations 3:18). The great hope that was before the church at the beginning of 2020 before the March 2020 shutdown of this country and the world took a serious hit when our operations moved online. Some ministries were well-equipped to make the transition; others had to expend significant resources to get caught up, and still others simply ceased to connect in meaningful ways. The majority of us have to admit that we were not ready to move our operations online. We lamented, like Jeremiah, how we were not prepared to replace in-person worship with weekly, meaningful worship experiences . The church rushed to get online, just as other business entities rushed to get online, and we quickly realized that many of our members were fatigued from being in front of a screen during the week, which is why they hungered for the in-person connection that the sanctuary provided them. They thirsted for the experience of the holy in the church building with their fellow church members with little care whether devices were charged, internet connections were strong enough, sound was loud enough, and the myriad of other issues that arise in online ministry. What a yeoman’s task the ministers accomplished last spring! They designed new ways to meet their congregations virtually, while serving as tech support to ensure their seniors had the technology, while seeking to engage the youth, while still teaching hope in the midst of uncertainty and despair. The minister’s job did not get easier when the world went online. Quite the contrary, it got decidedly harder. However, just as Joseph forgave his Brothers, so too did the ministers forgive COVID-19 because we found in time that we could minister to and through COVID-19, proclaiming to the pandemic on behalf of our churches, “Even though you intended to do harm to me, God intended it for good, in order to preserve a numerous people, as he is doing today” (Genesis 50:20 NRSV).


    Page 54

    Equity Issue for Seniors Consider fi rst the equity issue that got resolved when we all went online. Barriers to entry exist in church, particularly with in-person worship experiences. Surely, we pray such barriers to entry don’t exist, and we do all that we can to minimize or eradicate them, but unintentionally they are there. Many of our sick and shut in simply cannot get to the building. During the week, when we have evening programs or Bible study or worship services, many who have families must weigh the cost of getting off work, getting the kids together, getting over to the church, and then getting back home late before they must get up the next day and do it all over again. For many of those families, simply going home after work was a more convenient routine and a necessary fact of life for their own sanity. Many of our seniors do not like to drive in the dark and thus miss evening worship experiences. The explicit or implicit dress code of the church becomes a barrier to entry for some. All of these barriers crumble like the walls of Jericho when we move to an online environment. Many churches, including my own, worked diligently to ensure seniors had internet connections and computing devices. (Side note: You’ll be surprised how many persons in your congregation have extra desktops and laptops they are not using and will joyfully donate to a senior member of the church so they can have access). In addition to getting everyone connected, many churches found that streaming on multiple platforms offered maximum coverage to their members. Our church services were streamed on our website, our app, our social media pages, and via television streaming devices such as AppleTV, Amazon FireStick, and Roku. This increased availability gave the computer and TV user alike equity with respect to access. Whether it was Sunday morning worship, Wednesday evening Bible study, or a ministry/committee meeting, all could participate. Surely, some were more adept at the technology than others, but the length of the pandemic gave suffi cient time to practice such that by the time of Advent 2020, truly hope, peace, and joy had been restored. Everyone didn’t love it, but we understood that for this new normal, it was a necessity and the people adapted. We found more effi cient ways of conducting business, we identifi ed creative ways to serve communion virtually, and we progressed forward.

    Keeping Members Viable and Connected Our seniors stayed connected during times of increased isolation and vulnerability. What joy comes to the entire congregation when we log on to a Zoom videoconference call for Bible study and one of our 80+ year old seniors proudly unmutes herself and declares, “I logged on by myself this evening!” Wednesday Bible study expanded from one hour of studying God’s Word to a two hour “event.” The fellowship hour began an hour before Bible study where members, mostly seniors, would log on and connect. These are the same connections and conversations that would normally occur in the hallways and parking lot of the church, but the environment simply changed from church space to cyber space. Following the fellowship for thirty minutes, we then have prayer meeting for thirty minutes. This time of corporate prayer offers a centering to everyone who is in different locations, but now united in prayer. Finally, we transition into Bible study. Just as persons enter the space of Bible study at separate times depending on when they arrive to the church, so too now do persons enter the videoconference when their schedules will allow. However, the blessing is that now more members are present! Some are in the kitchen preparing their evening dinner,


    Page 55

    others are around the table eating, still others are in their dens/offi ces with their Bibles open and notes prepared, and others are lounging on their couches. As ministers, it does not matter to us how they got into the videoconferences; what matters is that they are there! For two hours on a Wednesday night, the depression of loneliness is suspended. The feeling of nothing to do and nowhere to go is lifted. The comfort and familiarity of church family and church faces provide stability and certainty in an uncertain world. The Pastor’s presence week in and week out, just as it does in the sanctuary, reminds the people of faith that God’s presence is with us and shall never leave us or forsake us (Hebrews 13:5).

    Use of Still Images and Videos Prior to COVID, the minister used mainly her voice to teach and preach the gospel . However, being online in the midst of this pandemic has offered many new ways to present the gospel and tell the stories of our faith. Many of us have engaged still images and videos to show maps giving a sense of where certain biblical narratives are located. We all recall when our churches fi rst put in screens and we tried to show such images. Some of our seniors and others with restricted eye sight mentioned that they simply could not see the details we were putting on the screen. COVID-19 has brought that large screen in the sanctuary to the small screen of a laptop or desktop computer right in their living room! The detail that many could not see prior to COVID , they are able to access now. Further still, some ministries do not have screens and digital technology in their sanctuaries, but with everyone at home on devices, they now can engage digital media in ways that were not even considered before. For my church, I cannot begin to describe how the use of historical art pieces during the teaching moment has brought a vividness in describing events that we did not have before. The use of still images digitally also raises a deeper, yet important discussion of historical accuracy where we can debate not only the accuracy of the art, but what we believe did and did not occur in certain narratives. Members who had only ever studied the Bible from the written word are now studying, considering, and thinking about God’s Word from the interpretation of the artists. We have long since known that this deepens the richness of our understanding when we expand the modes and means by which we interpret the scriptures. The challenge of being online has also brought forth the excitement of video engagement in both Bible study and worship. As a preacher/teacher, I feel liberated to not have to paraphrase or quote someone else’s ideas, but I can use their video so many can hear the original author’s thoughts from the original author’s voice. In the public domain of video sharing, there is a joyfully overwhelming amount of content (theological, biblical, and some practical) on any idea that is to be presented in the sermon and/or Bible study. The diversity of voices that can now be brought forth in the teaching moment is only paralleled by the impact such exposure to video sharing has on the spiritual growth of the church. The consistent modes that we were used to presenting and sharing the gospel in, prior to COVID-19, have now been expanded to endless opportunities to connect with members and guests in exactly the way they needed. My members have shared with me how much more engagement they fi nd with Bible study now that we are online. They comment on how easy it had become to just


    Page 56

    come to the church and listen. Now they are engaging consistently and deeply with the images, videos, and discussions that we are having. We are not tired of Zoom, but rather just getting started! As a teacher of scripture, I was pulled out of my comfort zone of active engagement during our studies within the church. I had gotten used to the location I taught from, where my members would sit while I was teaching, and how they were used to (and appreciated) receiving the material. All of us have been dislocated by this pandemic, but we are not experiencing the Zoom fatigue that is described in the popular media by those who must videoconference for work. Not only are we grateful for the connection, but I look forward to the weekly challenge of expanding the style and method of my teaching.

    Expanded Social Networks Members within the congregation fi nd a challenge as well. Although we never desire cliques in the church, we all acknowledge that a natural byproduct of the repetitive nature in which we meet is that cliques might form. Members generally sit in the same places so cliques form by chairs/pew. Members get involved in the small groups, ministries, and activities that are life giving to them, so cliques form by affi nity. However, the pandemic has changed where we sit and what we get involved in. I have personally watched relationships and connections form online that may never have formed before due to sheer proximity. Members are fi nding that they work in similar fi elds, know the same set of friends, visit the same locations in Atlanta, and even live nearer to one another simply by being connected online. Previous connections that were not made because we tend to exist within our own bubbles and own networks have now been expanded. The bonds of fruitful relationships and new connections will certainly be a blessing to the church. New ministry ideas and greater collaborations within the church occur when diverse people get together and brainstorm ways to bless the ministry without the shackles of “what we’ve always done” binding their creativity. The church’s ability to expand our reach, help larger groups of people, and share the gospel with others is helped, not hindered by these expanded social networks. New collaborations within our church have already offered to the leadership new Bible study series topics, a fundamental change in the way we approach youth ministry , and have begun the discussions of how we make in-person church engaging so that people will want to come back while simultaneously engaging an online/cyber audience that is unable to come back in person due to their circumstances.

    Increased focus on the gospel New collaborations in ministry also lead to new attitudes towards worship and biblical study. Prior to COVID, many of us can admit that ministry/worship, in some ways, had become perfunctory. The limitations of the sanctuary and the church building stifl ed our creativity of how we would focus on the gospel because we had developed tried and true methods for operating within the building. All who have ever served in ministry can admit that the practices and processes for operations within the building had been developed without the idea of continuous improvement in mind. We did not design the pulpit and the furniture therein with the idea of moving everything around every three months. The fi xed pews in most of our sanctuaries were not designed with the idea of the sanctuary being fl exible space to be used for


    Page 57

    more than just worship on Sunday. The hymns chosen, songs selected, and sermons prepared were all done in the view of a certain liturgical rhythm that COVID-19 disrupted. And thankfully so! Surely the liturgical calendar continued and certain seasons of the church have come and gone, but from Easter to Advent in 2020, how could the minister preach in an empty sanctuary and not take time to address why the sanctuary was empty? How could we not consider that our members were in their homes with all the trappings of attention stealers that are present in the residence? In the sanctuary, for all intents and purposes, we have a captive audience, so we can proceed business as usual, but online we must be more engaging than the dozens of other options a member has or else we will lose them. Without the limitations of our normal processes, we thought critically about the gospel, how to share it, and how to present it. We shortened our sermons, recognizing that holding a person’s attention in front of a screen is different than holding their attention sitting in the sanctuary. The time previously afforded to us after the ushers had closed the doors and a member was essentially “trapped” until the benediction was now gone. Members could log on and log off and we would be none the wiser. In response we dove deep into God’s Word, focusing solely on the gospel and its presentation, as we knew this was the truth that we must proclaim to the world in the time and space that was allotted to us online. In ministry, Zoom fatigue does not yet exist because we have far too many opportunities ahead of us for how we can now faithfully fulfi ll the great commission in ways never considered before. Zoom has pierced a digital veil. Now all churches, not just some, can bring the gospel into conversations that were being held online that for far too long had been shamefully shunned out of the church building. Pundits have said that the shrinking of the church will be exacerbated by COVID -19, but the hope that is in my heart joyfully disagrees. Zoom has brought the effi cient frontier of online ministry to a broader landscape of churches. We will see not a shrinking, but an expansion, of faith and faithful discussions in the larger “church” called cyberspace. Our defi nition of the sanctuary will change, and our understanding of Bible study will grow. Nothing has stopped the movement of Christianity for some two thousand years, and surely, we knew that this corona virus pandemic would be no different. The unexpected joy we received from the unintended consequences of the pandemic has now reshaped ministry for the better. Indeed we are grateful for the equity of leveled access for all to our services, the power of keeping our seniors viable and connected, the use of still images and videos to offer more vivid presentations of what we normally would simply say verbally, the building of new social networks within the church, and the increased focus on the gospel over the perfunctory distractions that occur within the sanctuary. Truly the Lord has blessed us.

  • Preaching the Advent Texts

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 3

    Preaching the Advent Texts

    Katherine Grieb

    Virginia Theological Seminary, Alexandria, Virginia

    I start from the assumption that all preaching, like all theology and all biblical interpretation, is both textual and contextual. Every time we open the Bible, in a stance of expectant listening for the Word of God speaking to us from within it, we should not be surprised to fi nd that the Bible had changed. It is almost as if God had rolled out a new set of Advent lessons for the Church, custom made for our present circumstance. We will see things and hear things we had never noticed before. Of course, they were always there, ready and waiting for us to fi nd them, but we weren’t ready to receive them yet, so they were invisible and inaudible to us, as if they weren’t there before. Now, when we so desperately need them, they shine bright and clear, like icicles in the moonlight; they sound forth like a full symphony orchestra. In order to understand better the interaction of text and context that makes these old words so new for us, we preachers might adopt a fourfold strategy of reading: reading the season; reading the situation; reading the people; and reading the biblical texts.

    Reading the Season What has changed? Isn’t Advent always the same with its emphasis on the Coming of Jesus Christ? The Latin word Adventus means arrival or coming. In Advent, we prepare our hearts for the mystery of the incarnation (or enfl eshment) of the Word, the Son of God become human, God with us, one of us and yet not exactly one with us, because fully God as well as fully human. The Church has traditionally taught that we wait for the Advent of Christ, not in a passive way (as if we were killing time waiting in a long line for it to fi nally be our turn for something) but in an active, expectant, hopeful stance (on tiptoe, curious, eager, watchful, as if expecting a friend or loved one to enter the door at any moment). During the four weeks of Advent which precede the feast of Christmas, the celebration of the incarnation, the Church waits expectantly in three different ways, or, better, for three different aspects of the coming of Christ: in history, in mystery, and in majesty. The lessons chosen for Advent reinforce this threefold coming: we look to the past, to the history of Jesus of Nazareth who was sent by God and came to dwell with us and to redeem us; we look to the present, to those mystical times when we are encountered by the risen Christ in moments of prayer, in the power of the preached word, in the sacraments of the Church; and we look to the future, when Jesus Christ will return in majesty to judge the living and the dead, as confessed in the ecumenical creeds of the churches. All of this is standard doctrine or church teaching about Advent, so why does it feel so different this year? Perhaps we need to focus more precisely on the quality of our waiting and the several kinds of preparation to which God may be calling church members this Advent.

    Reading the Situation A friend and I were trading ideas about words or phrases that should be banned, at least temporarily, from all public speech. You already know them: “This has been


    Page 4

    a year like no other,” “unprecedented,” “of course, that was before COVID,” “then COVID made that impossible,” etc. We were hardly serious: people need to be able to talk about the way it was before the COVID pandemic and how different our lives are at present, and how we can’t wait until this situation changes, and what we think the odds are about how soon this could or could not happen. Yet we might notice that even our language is tired! The truth that is slowly dawning on us is that we have no idea how long this pandemic is going to last, how many more variants there might be and how dangerous and how contagious they could be, how long our politically divided nation will interpret almost everything in a hyper-politicized way, how the health policies and medical possibilities of nations around the world will affect their lives and ours, and many other things that are highly relevant to our present situation and our well-being about which we have no idea. If knowledge is power, our inability to know things that affect us directly and personally is a form of powerlessness. Moreover, as we keep hearing, the COVID pandemic has exposed and magnifi ed the fault lines of injustice, especially racial injustice, that many in our nation have spent considerable time and energy hiding from ourselves, so that it would not be necessary to change them. Apparently, there are things we really want to know and things we really don’t want to know. In August a year ago, I wrote for the Journal for Preachersan article about preaching in Advent 2020, in which, with no special gifts for telling the future, I predicted some things that I thought would be self-evident: the COVID virus still going strong, travel somewhat safer and also making things harder, school systems struggling to keep up with the latest infection and death numbers and to make decisions, constant change on all fronts trying to second guess the results of the pandemic, unemployment and loss of housing, especially for tenants, more “natural” disasters, increased tension about race and racial injustice, a deeply-divided nation, and emotional exhaustion. Unfortunately, I would have to venture the same predictions this year for Advent–with the addition of long obituary sections in the newspapers and many families facing Thanksgiving and Christmas this year with an empty chair at the table where a loved one had been only a year ago. The fatigue level is even higher now, because, for a while, the statistical numbers seemed to be improving and people became hopeful that we were nearing the end of this long ordeal; federal guidelines became more liberal; but now the numbers changed again and Sisyphus-like, we are starting over, having lost so much ground and so many lives.

    Reading the People Not surprisingly, the people of God, like most of the rest of the world, are struggling with the length and breadth and depth of this pandemic. Some of us, with tendencies towards addiction or depression are struggling even more. Parents and teachers are feeling an additional weight trying to protect the next generations and sometimes not realizing their own needs for self-care to avoid burn-out. Community leaders become targets for pent-up frustration. Hospital systems (doctors, nurses, fi rst responders, cleaners) are not only losing staff to the pandemic and so working short-staffed, but they are also staring at death and dying people so much that they should probably be cycled out for more restful positions. But replacements are lacking, so they go on. Increased stress probably leads to more road and home accidents, so fi refi ghters and


    Page 5

    police are also stretched thin. I’m seeing more road rage and more anger in general, which means that people are afraid and stressed and unable to cope with their situations , but that means that everyone else’s stress increases, too. It is hard right now. The world can feel too hard to go on. All the signs that it has felt like that (suicides, homicides, violent crimes) witness to the hopelessness that many people are feeling. The preacher needs to touch these wounds lightly and carefully, but never talking about them at all would not be a good strategy for pastoral care. There are also incredible bursts of creativity, generosity, and a sense of wonder at the beauty of the created world that are not only helping people to survive, but also fi lling them with joy, even in the midst of great diffi culties and complex challenges. Artists and performers are fi nding ways to use technology to overcome the diffi culties of gathering safely. Musicians, dancers, actors, painters have all found ways to inspire the rest of us. Generous giving is not just the result of an improving stock market: people of all income levels are fi nding ways to help one another, to rescue animals, to plant trees and gardens. Not being able to travel has apparently released a lot of unused energy that has gone into writing, singing, composing, and dreaming of new and wonderful projects for the common good. There is a great deal of human resilience and resistance that refuses to give up hope and dares to try something never before imagined. There is much to celebrate here, and preachers have the power of naming: naming both the realities that are making life hard and also naming strategies for overcoming those realities in places where it seemed impossible. Every time one of these stories of resistance and resilience is told, it may move some other person to bold dreams and courageous action. This is not quite “the power of positive thinking” of an earlier generation, but it is a witness to the power of blessing what is good and true and beautiful. Whatever is praised from the pulpit is remembered, appreciated, and often imitated.

    Reading the Biblical Texts I suggested above that the traditional language of Advent about waiting for the Coming of Jesus Christ and preparing the way for that arrival in our hearts and minds might have special power this year–as counter-intuitive as that is in our situation of waiting for this pandemic to be over, or at least managed, and feeling like we have already prepared and prepared and prepared during the time we couldn’t act! Moreover , I began this essay with the assumption that the “same old biblical texts” might contain some treasures not discernible to our old eyes and ears. As we mature in our faith, we tend to ask deeper theological questions than we did as children. I would argue that the people of God have grown in the last year or so: partly because we have had more time to think and pray than we have in times past and partly because we have been besieged with questions to think and pray about. As always, God is there before us, anticipating our questions and welcoming them. This is the God who loves to listen to the desires of our hearts, who instructs us to ask, seek, knock, and promises to meet us in the scriptures. As Martin Luther put it, it is as if God were saying to us “If you want to fi nd me, you know where to look: I will be present in the bread and wine of the Eucharist and in the waters of Baptism; and you will hear my voice speaking to you through the words of the Bible lessons for the day.” One of the privileges of preparing a sermon is that the congregation has deputized us (and trusted us) to explore the lessons for the day, searching for the


    Page 6

    Word of God in the words of the biblical texts. Part of the excitement of the preacher is like the child who has gone searching for treasure on the beach and returns running to the rest of the family, saying “Look what I found! Isn’t this wonderful?” At once, the discarded shell, long ignored, is seen to contain rainbow colors or a tiny creature inside.

    The First Sunday of Advent: “Come, Thou Long Expected Jesus” (a hymn by Charles Wesley) All three aspects of the Coming of Jesus Christ are present in the lessons for First Advent, the beginning of the Christian new year. Like our Jewish brothers and sisters, Christians begin the new year in a sober, refl ective fashion, not like the ancient Roman Kalends (from which we get the word calendar) which involved way too much drinking . The Collect of the Day notes that “Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility” and “shall come again in his glorious majesty to judge both the living and the dead” and prays for present “grace to cast away the works of darkness and put on the armor of light” (Romans 13:12). What kind of preparation for Christ’s coming is implied in the concept of putting on an armor of light? What kind of protection is that? In 1 Thessalonians 3:9-13, Paul prays that God will “strengthen your hearts in holiness that you may be blameless… at the coming of our Lord Jesus with all his saints.” It is clear from these words that the waiting which Paul has in mind is an active heart housecleaning, so that the saints on earth are fi t to entertain the saints who have gone before. Jeremiah 33:14-16 speaks of the attributes of the One who is coming: justice and righteousness. Psalm 25:7 echoes that idea: “Gracious and upright is the Lord,” and verse 9 suggests another kind of preparation: “the paths of the Lord are love and faithfulness.” The Gospel for First Advent focuses primarily on the Return or Second Coming of Jesus Christ. The preacher may well want to linger here because there is often great confusion about how literally to understand apocalyptic language which is a kind of poetry. Luke 21:25ff speaks of signs in the sun, moon, and stars, the roaring of the sea, the powers of heaven being shaken, and people fainting from fear. Language taken from Daniel 7:14 describes “the Son of man coming in a cloud” which is not a cause for fear but a cause for rejoicing, “because your redemption is drawing near.” Some people in the ancient world thought that the end times would be like a woman giving birth (apocalyptic birth pangs) as the new order of God’s righteousness was born. The time of labor would come upon people suddenly and unexpectedly, as labor pains sometimes do. So Luke’s Jesus warns his disciples to “be alert at all times” and to “be on guard that your hearts are not weighed down.” What could weigh our hearts down? Dissipation and drunkenness, to be sure, but “the worries of this life” as well. The quality of our waiting for the Coming of Jesus Christ is at issue here: we are expecting redemption, so we are invited to be light of heart as we wait for God’s justice in the return of Christ.

    The Second Sunday of Advent: “Born to Set Thy People Free” (Charles Wesley) The next three Sundays all deal with John the Baptizer, especially the next two. In the Orthodox tradition, John is called “the Forerunner” (in the ancient world, the person who ran ahead of the king and warned the people to get ready to receive him). The Collect describes God as merciful: “You sent your messengers the prophets to preach repentance and prepare the way of our salvation.” Malachi 3:1-4 gives us the


    Page 7

    words Malachi heard from God: “I am sending my messenger to prepare the way before me.” Then God describes God’s own coming: “The Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple.” That would seem to be wonderful news until the question God asks: “But who can endure the day of his coming, and who can stand when he appears?” (God will be like the refi ner’s fi re that burns away impurities from gold and silver so that they are pure.) The father of John the Baptizer is Zechariah, and his song (Luke 1:68-79) directly addresses his infant son, the cousin of Jesus, born just months before him: “You, my child, shall be called the prophet of the Most High, for you will go before the Lord to prepare his way.” That way, the way of the Lord Jesus, is a way of freedom: “the forgiveness of sins” in the dawning light of God’s compassion “to shine on those who dwell in darkness and the shadow of death” (Could any biblical text be more relevant than that one?) and “to guide our feet into the way of peace.” What powerful language of salvation and redemption! All of this prepares our way for the Gospel (Luke 3:1-6) where the adult John r r is introduced in the words of Isaiah 40. John is “the voice of one crying out in the wilderness: prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.” John will baptize Jesus in the Jordan River, and when John is shut up in Herod’s prison, Jesus will carry on his ministry of preaching repentance from sin and will add to that the ministry of setting people free from Satan’s power. Before all that is said, we see a close up shot of Luke’s care as a historian to locate John both in secular history (the Roman emperor Tiberius; the governor of Judea Pontius Pilate; three sons of Herod the Great: Antipas, Philip, and Lysanias) and also in Temple history: the high priests Annas and Caiaphas. That was when the word of God came to John in the wilderness.

    The Third Sunday of Advent: “From Our Fears and Sins Release Us” (Charles Wesley) The Collect prays that God will come among us with great power: “Because we are sorely hindered by our sins,”…“speedily help and deliver us.” Deliverance is the theme that runs through Zephaniah 3:14-20 as well. “The Lord has taken away the judgments against you.” “The King of Israel, the Lord, is in your midst; you shall fear disaster no more.” Instead, God “will rejoice over you with gladness” and “will renew you in his love.” Paul, writing to the Philippians (4:4-7) invites them (and by implication us) to “Rejoice in the Lord always.” He explains, “The Lord is near. Do not worry about anything, but in everything by prayer … let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.” Once again, we are prompted to think about how we wait and how we prepare for the Coming of Christ in Advent. The Gospel lesson almost takes us there, as we hear what John the Baptizer says about himself and about the coming of Jesus: “I baptize you with water; but one who is more powerful than I is coming; I am not worthy to untie the thong of his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fi re.” The prophecy of John is fulfi lled in Luke’s second book, the Acts of the Apostles, when, at Pentecost, Jesus pours out the Holy Spirit upon the Church in tongues of fi re, from his place at the right hand of God. The fi rst part of the Gospel shows John at his fi ercest: “Bear fruits worthy of repentance.”… “Even now the axe is lying at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fi re.” But when the


    Page 8

    crowds ask him what they should do to prepare (and we listen in eagerly), he gives them practical advice about sharing possessions and food with the needy and warns about greed, corruption, extortion, and coveting. This is practical ethical advice. John shows us the way to justice and to equity.

    The Fourth Sunday of Advent: “Let Us Find Our Rest in Thee” (Charles Wesley) The last Sunday focuses on our daily life and on the present action of God more than on what we need to do to prepare for the Coming of Jesus Christ. The Collect refl ects the shift: “Purify our conscience”…“by your daily visitation, that your Son Jesus Christ, at his coming, may fi nd in us a mansion prepared for himself.” The word mansion in our day may produce thoughts of a huge house (megamansion), but it used to mean only a place to rest. Our hunch that size is not the issue here is confi rmed by the prophet Micah (5:2) who hears God speak to the town of Bethlehem: “You, O Bethlehem of Ephrathah, who are one of the little clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to rule in Israel, whose origin is from of old, from ancient days.” The One who is to come “will feed his fl ock… and they live secure, for now he shall be great to the ends of the earth; and he shall be the One of peace.” Psalm 80 picks up the theme of God as the Shepherd of Israel, and the refrain (v.3 and v.7) prays: “Restore us, O God of hosts; show the light of your countenance, and we shall be saved.” Hebrews 10:5-10 hints at the purpose of the incarnation by quoting Psalm 40: God prepared a body for the Son, so that he would be both priest and sacrifi ce, perfectly fulfi lling the will of God and effecting our sanctifi cation. But the preacher will probably head for the Gospel lesson which recounts the meeting of Mary and Elizabeth (and John the Baptizer jumping for joy in her womb). Mary takes the initiative, travels to the hill country, enters the house of Zechariah, and greets Elizabeth. At the sound of her voice, unborn John reacts, and Elizabeth, fi lled with the Holy Spirit, says the fi rst “hail, Mary.” Mary’s response is the famous Magnifi cat in which she praises God for mercy and justice for the poor and powerless . Mary is herself pregnant with Jesus by the power of the Holy Spirit. One of the wonderful things about Luke’s Gospel is the beginning of his account of the annunciation to Mary by the angel Gabriel which happens “in the sixth month” (1:26). The sixth month of what? Why, of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, of course!

  • A Film and Its Message of Suffering and Hope in a Pandemic

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 62

    A Film and Its Message of Suffering and Hope

    in a Pandemic

    Thomas A. Summers

    Columbia, South Carolina

    Hope is being able to see that there is light despite all of the darkness. Desmond Tutu

    In its cinematic portrayal of a fi ctional pandemic, the ten-year-old Contagion delivers a déjéjé à vu experience to us veterans of the real COVID-19 menace. It’s as if we are taken back in time to the yet uncertain journey that we currently are traveling. William Faulkner once put it this way: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”1 As a Lenten Season reminds us of the suffering of Jesus and our own soul searching, an exploration of this particular movie can offer a vital resource for ministry during pandemic times. The fi lm’s screenwriter held a long-time interest in how viruses are transmitted. With Contagion, he wanted to develop a medical thriller that “felt like what could really happen.”2 Apparently an avalanche of viewers ten years after the inception of the fi lm felt that Burns achieved what he was seeking. Contagion was listed as the number two catalog on Warner Brothers in March, 2020, compared to its number 270 rank the previous December, 2019.3 A major factor that contributed to the fi lm’s conveying a stark realism and actuality was the thorough consultation received by the screenwriter and director from experts in the fi eld of epidemiology. For example, the nation’s own Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) provided invaluable time. These accurate insights about critical pandemic matters are put into the fabric of the fi lm. The fi lm’s brilliance was not harmed either by its all-star cast of such acting notables as Gwyneth Paltrow, Matt Damon, Jude Law, Kate Winslet, Laurence Fishburne, and Marion Cottillard. If there is one encompassing issue that is seen in Contagion, it is that we humans are so interconnected with one another. The lightening-fast spread of a pandemic illustrates how we are so deeply and extensively linked. At the outset of the movie, this hidden speed is demonstrated. Beth Emhoff (Gwyneth Paltrow) is spending her last night in Hong Kong before returning to Minneapolis. She is enjoying the revelry with a celebrating crowd in a bar that includes casino games and a restaurant. Assuredly the most critical moment in the fi lm occurs when she shakes hands with an apronwearing chef. Little did each know that earlier he had handled some faulty pork that had been infected by a bat. From then and until her death several days later, there was left behind the hidden imprint of a new life-destroying MEV-1 virus radiating itself out to the whole world. These overall ties with each other were described by Martin Luther King, Jr. in the following manner: “All life is interrelated. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied into a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”4


    Page 63

    It is through such an interwoven network that major themes emerge from the movie. This human connectedness provides the grounding out of which they grew. Following is a retrospective look at some of them. A most critical issue is that of the transmissible assault that a deadly virus can make on the individualperson’s usual resources as connections are sought with others. For example, the human touch is considered to be one of the most nurturing aspects in human relations. Cindy Lamonthe attests to this need: “A hug from a close friend isn’t only comforting; it also produces hormones in the brain like serotonin, dopamine, and oxytocin—all of which help boost the immune system and ward off illness. But it does more than just make you feel good; it can accurately communicate emotions like gratitude, love, and sympathy.”5 The writers of the New Testament include versions of how important Jesus’s touch was to persons in their search for health. Many of the sufferers felt that if they only could touch the hem of his garment, that even there healing would be found (Matthew 9:21). But paradoxically—rather than knowing the closeness of a human touch—social distancing becomes a necessity in preventing the dangers of a viral spread in a pandemic. A similar vulnerability is evident in being near space where breath is being expelled by another person. Should you not be wearing a mask, there could be exposure to potential droplets of the virus lingering in the air. Also objects that have received a touch by an infected person provide a risk should someone else later touch the same object—a glass, hymnal, dollar bill, or any “fomite” (an object touched by an infected person). Today’s exile of quarantined distance from such perils has resonance with the experience of the psalmist: “How can we sing the Lord’s song while in a foreign land?” (Psalm 137:4). However, if evil can be interpreted through the lens of human intent, society may long discuss the blameworthy results from the huge gatherings of persons in this pandemic era. These “super spreaders” include such places as political rallies, houses of worship, beaches, and other locales where the necessary practice of social distancing and the wearing of masks was avoided. Another theme seen in this fi lm is the matter of governance. The movie’s emphasis on the process of governing wisely was focused on the presumed Executive Branch’s allowing the designated experts in the fi elds of epidemiology, public health, and medical research to lead the way forward. Contagion’s constant utilization of these scientifi c resources such as those in the nation’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was the empowering factor in the fi ctional pandemic’s fade within four and a half months. In sharp contrast, the current COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. yet continues. By the middle of September 2020, the number of deaths due to the virus increased to 200,000 persons. This fi gure exceeded more than any other country in the world. (This article was completed in early October, 2020.) Very disturbingly, the U.S. President failed to demonstrate the kind of early governing leadership needed in response to the coronavirus as it erupted throughout the nation and world. His was a constant media presence that inferred his taking the leading role in commenting about the pandemic. Also he showed publicly in his governance a propensity to dispel science by downgrading the seriousness of this particular virus. He downplayed the wearing of masks as recommended. Later, tapes


    Page 64

    revealed that he indeed did know its grave consequences but that he did not want “to create panic in the nation.” In early October 2020, he himself became infl icted with the COVID-19. The failure seen in this kind of governmental leadership is summarized in the following statement: “The tragedy is that if science and common sense solutions were united in a national, coordinated response, the U.S. would have avoided many thousands more deaths this (past) summer.”6 I would prefer the joining of another issue to those profound values of “science and common sense.” And that would be the addition of “moral wisdom.” Such a combination is a reminder to the governing parties that policies (e.g, face masks) need to be developed for the care and safety of all persons. Without it, you are left to the whims and lack of knowledge expressed by a governing leader. An obvious matter that emerges in the fi lm is that of the historical relationship between individual rights and the common good. This sometimes strained issue between the person and some sense of moral order for all persons aptly illustrates King’s earlier perspective; that is, we all are embedded “in an inescapable network of mutuality.” As of September 2020, the ongoing damage yet done to the U.S. by the COVID19 crisis showed, in an up-and-down fashion, the national fragility of these two poles. Very notably, the effects of the earlier Memorial Day and July Fourth celebrations brought great harm to the nation’s journey toward recovery. For instance, the aftermath of the Memorial Day weekend eventually saw the 7-day average rise to an astonishing 83% increase in the number of COVID-19 cases.7 Prior to the weekend, the national mood tended to contain elements of hopefulness due to the gradual receding of viral transmissions. But without much attention to social distancing, extremely large crowds fl ooded into dangerous venues like beaches and other hot spots. Cautionary restraints had been thrown into the winds of self-centered energy. Contagion’s emphasis between individual rights and the welfare of the larger society was focused in a slightly different way. It portrayed what can happen when a pandemic plays a major role in the rapid disintegration of society. As an example, a scene showed a grocery store being overrun and looted by hunger-driven persons. Another representation in the fi lm depicted a break-in that occurred at the home of the CDC director (Laurence Fishburne). This frightening event followed the news that a vaccine had been fast-tracked for approval. A spreading pandemic reaches deep into the human soul and brings right before our eyes the tension between our individual claims and the larger society. Eleanor Roosevelt once commented about this tightrope on which we tread: “Freedom makes a requirement of every human being. With freedom comes responsibility.”8 As a pandemic crashes into our lives, this social trauma provides fertile ground on which the distortion of untruths and conspiracy theories soon appear. These kinds of interpretations invariably defy consensus and cannot be proven using the historical or scientifi c method. Yet, they feed into the frightened thoughts of persons already bewildered by a pandemic. Abraham Maslow, a noted psychologist, indicates that one of the earliest and most basic human needs in our personality development is the need for safety. This implies such primary wants as avoiding pain, being free of chaos, and the possession of shelter.9An untruth—false as it is—gives the susceptible person a safe narrative or


    Page 65

    reason for why one is feeling so threatened. As COVID-19 quickly made its way into the U.S., two writers observed the relationship between a quarantined nation and the infl uence of emerging untruths and conspiracy theories. They listed the fi ve top ones receiving major attention: the virus as a bioweapon, use of the pandemic by Bill Gates to install human trackers, the blame of 5G cell towers for the virus, and the ushering in of a new “World Order.”10 The most permeating and often seen character in Contagion is Alan Krumwiede (Jude Law). He is a journalist and a blogging conspiracy theorist. In taking advantage of the nation’s panic, his videotaped cable program attracts twelve million listeners. His overall activity has accumulated for him over four and a half million dollars. The movie leaves you with the impression that the screenwriter and director had a strong priority in spotlighting this dangerous role. That is, Krumwiede’s constant drumbeat of deceptive information can undermine science and epidemiology in the unifi ed attempt to combat a pandemic. As the fi lm’s version of the viral outbreak begins in the U.S., he is seen discussing his notion that the worldwide mercury poisoning of fi sh is the likely reason behind this oncoming dilemma. Later, an accusation is made by him that a conspiracy scheme has been developed between the government and drug companies in a clandestine profi t-making venture. He further blames the CDC and WHO of collusion with drug companies. Due to his sponsorship of a homeopathic remedy in Forsythia, the demand for it becomes so strained that a public riot occurs. Contagion’s strong emphasis on the danger of spreading untruths has much resonance with the message of the New Testament. Especially in times of peril, the words of Jesus often call for vigilance: “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed…” (Luke 12:15). Greed invariably arrives in many ways. Krumweide packages his greediness with a reckless sense of needing power over others and also profi t-making. As we take precautions against power-driven fabrications during a pandemic, these words give us courage: “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32). Reliance on scientifi c information accompanied by the strength of one’s own spiritual quest and moral wisdom can be safeguards against the likes of a Krumwiede. Another critical theme that is seen from a pandemic’s path of wreckage is that of social marginalization. Sometimes the onslaught of a pandemic is thought of as a “great equalizer.” But the social devastation created by such a plague offers anything but parity. A pandemic tears the scab from a society’s exterior and shines a spotlight on the disproportions that already existed there on the excluding margins. These include the homeless, communities of color, incarcerated persons, those having little accessibility to proper healthcare, and other vulnerable groups. An early April 2020 study indicated that African American persons in Chicago comprised 30% of the city’s population, yet they totaled 52% of the city’s COVID19 infections.11 Another example of extreme social vulnerability is that of elderly persons living in nursing homes. They total 42% of all the COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. These sometimes silent deaths are occurring in locations that house 0.62% of the U.S. population.12 In late spring 2020, my wife and I received a phone call from two of the adult children whose mother earlier had died. We had known her and the family for 50 years as special friends in our neighborhood. She was 85 years old, and her health steadily


    Page 66

    declined before she was placed in a nursing home. Later she became affl icted with COVID-19. Thereafter the children were not able to enter the room for an embrace or to hold her hand. The only contact that they were allowed was to stand, agonizingly so, outside of the building. In that location they could look through a window and see their mother slowly ebb away. Practicing social distance and wearing masks, my wife and I met with our friends. Without being able to hug them, we listened to their grief. Our foursome shared nurturing stories and memories about this beloved woman. The accompanying tears became like ointments of care. These small waters built a bridge on which our common pain traveled. Ours had a grief-bearing commonality with countless families, friends, ministers, grief counselors, and so many others. Contagion explores this theme of the social margins through a dramatic episode of kidnapping. After a week of the viral outbreak, Dr. Leonora Orentes (Marion Cottillard ), a WHO staff member, is sent to Hong Kong. Her main objective was to engage in some contact tracing. Her assessment concluded that the fi rst viral transmissions for the whole pandemic had originated there in a casino restaurant. A businesswoman from Minneapolis had become identifi ed as being the “Patient Zero” via a review of the security cameras. Soon this WHO representative was kidnapped by persons related to a nearby poverty-stricken locale. Many of the villagers had become quickly infected with the spreading virus. One of the residents in the village happened to have been a waiter at the casino. Dr. Orentes was held for ransom at the village until the new vaccine could be delivered. There is human agony already existing on the social margins. And there is unbelievable magnifi cation as a death-producing pandemic appears and rampages through lives. Shakespeare’s words refl ect such an invasion: “When sorrows come, they come not in single spies, but in battalions.”13 As a pandemic endures for these many months, we sometimes lose our grip on hope and begin wondering if the scourge of this pestilence will ever end. There is much about which to be despondent during these times of angst. There is the despair of losing friends and loved ones to a viral death. The COVID-19 era has scattered widely its harmful effects on commerce, healthcare, educational systems, and nearly every aspect of our lives. Recent reports indicate that military suicide has risen as much as 20% during the 2020 year.14 Yet amid our times of feeling low in spirit, there are inspiring moments that cross our daily paths; for example, the heroism seen in those front-line healthcare workers who courageously risk their own lives in caring for victims of COVID-19. Their service to others can fi ll our own hearts with thanks and hope. The fi lm depicts the courageous qualities of Dr. Ernin Mears (Kate Winslet) of the CDC. At the beginning of the pandemic in the U.S., she is sent to Minneapolis to give consultation to public healthcare offi cials there. Very soon, she is overwhelmed by the virus herself and dies in a makeshift holding area for dying persons. The sensitive reinterpreting of some unclear theological issues can have value in creating more hopefulness in pandemic times. For example, apocalyptic thinking often occurs in response to tragedies like pandemics and major fl oods. The word apocalypse is derived from the “revealing” of the end-of-time days in Revelation—the last book of the New Testament. Its underlying belief is that such a mammoth disaster is caused


    Page 67

    by unrighteous people and God’s judgment. Hence, overly frightened persons might be feeling that today’s worldwide pandemic is a sign that the conclusion of all time is not far off. In his evaluation of apocalypse, Brian Blount suggests that in New Testament days there certainly were issues of hopelessness and unrighteousness. But Jesus came into the world and revealed a sense of hope and care for all persons. Therefore, we today become revealing carriers of that hope for the wholeness of community by our replicating his ministry. Hence, Blount suggests that kind of action is “revelatory apocalyptic,” not an “end of times apocalyptic.”15 The theme of hope is powerfully portrayed near the conclusion of the fi lm. The script displays that its accompanying MEV-1 virus has been brought under control. After more than four months of uncertainty and despair in the U.S., a vaccine is beginning to be distributed. In his Minneapolis home, Mitch Emhoff (Matt Damon) is upstairs getting dressed in his suit. Earlier that day, he had presented a new dress to his high school daughter. He asked her to wear it for a special occasion that evening in the living room. Before going downstairs to meet with his daughter, Mitch looks at a picture of his wife Beth (Gwyneth Paltrow) and begins to cry. She had made the business trip to Hong Kong four months before and had become the initial conveyer of the worldwide virus before her death. As he meets with his high school daughter, she becomes so surprised and happy with how he had developed the room into a temporary prom setting. Suddenly the doorbell rings, and standing there is her boyfriend Andrew in his tuxedo. He is wearing his new plastic bracelet that indicates he has received the much-prized vaccine. Mitch takes a formal picture of the smiling couple before they dance the night away in their new prom atmosphere. Emerging from a suffering world, there is indeed hope for the future and its new generations as pictured by Contagion! May the Lenten Season of 2021 be a profound aid in helping us, our nation, and the broader world discover that gift too.

    Notes 1 William Faulkner, “Quotes,” goodreads, accessed August 5, 2020, https://www.goodreads.com/ quotes/12124-the-past-is-never-present-it-is-not-even-past/. 2 Edward Douglas, “CS: Contagion Writer Scott Z. Burns,” ComingSoon.net, September 6, 2011, accessed August 15, 2020, www.en.wikipedia.org/. 3 Travis Clark, “Pandemic movie ‘Contagion’ is surging in popularity due to the coronavirus and has hit the No.7 spot on iTunes,” Business Weekly, March 6, 2011. 4 Martin Luther King, Jr., The Triumph of Conscience (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1968), 69. 5 Lamonthe, Cindy, “Let’s Touch: Why Physical Connection between Human Beings Matter,” The Guardian, January 3, 2003, 1. 6 Alex Fitzgerald and Elijah Wolfson, “The American Nightmare,” Time, vol. 196, no. 11-12, September 10, 2020, 24-27. 7 Ibid. 8 Eleanor Roosevelt, “Quotes,” goodreads, accessed September 5, 2020, https://www.goodreads.com/ quotes/230160-freedom-makes-a-huge-requirement-of-every-human-being/. 9 Beth Housekemp, “Maslow, Abraham (1908-70),” Dictionary of Pastoral Care and Counseling, ed. Rodney J. Hunter (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1990), 691. 10 Steven Greenstreet and Suzy Weiss, “Coronoavirus conspiracy theories don’t stop at Bill Gates and 5G,” New York Post, htpps://nypost.com/2020/04/24/the-top-5-coronavirus-conspiracy-theories-billgates -5G-more/.


    Page 68

    11 UIC Jane Addams College of Social Work Website, Affi rmations, Spring 2020, accessed September 14, 2020. 12 Psychiatry Research (Science Direct), “An invisible human rights crisis: The marginalization of older adults during the Covid-19 pandemic—An advocacy review,” vol. 292, October 2020, 11369. 13 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act IV, Scene V. 14 Associated Press, “Military suicides up as much as 20% in COVID era,” The State, 3A, September 28, 2020. 15 Sally Sherer, “Scripture in a Time of Pandemic: Where to Find Hope,” Presbyterian Foundation News, April 21, 2020, article based on presentation by Dr. Brian Blount, https://www.presbyterianfoundation. org/scripture-in-a-time-of-pandemic-where-to-fi nd-hope/.

  • Tread Marks and Roses: Glimpses of Resurrection

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 2

    Tread Marks and Roses: Glimpses of Resurrection

    Thomas G. Long

    Cambridge, Maryland

    “You know, I like Christianity, but I would not like it without the resurrection. Show me your resurrection.” Zen Master to a Trappist Monk1

    “We do not gather at Easter to celebrate a doctrine, the doctrine of the Resurrection. We come here to rejoice in the presence of one we love, in Jesus who was lost to us and has been found….Jesus was one of us who was born and died as we do, who left us desolate in his death as all our friends do or will do….God has mysteriously and wonderfully changed that,…by a miracle of new creation, Jesus, our human friend, is with us bodily again….”2 So says the Catholic theologian Herbert McCabe in a remarkable Easter sermon. On Easter, McCabe reminds us, we are not simply encouraged to work through the intellectual puzzles of the claims of resurrection nor merely to remember what an inspiring person and wise teacher Jesus was. We are, instead, to join the company of the women on Easter morning, running back astonished from the empty tomb, who encounter the living presence of Jesus and who in awe grasp his feet in worship. When McCabe says “Jesus, our human friend, is with us bodily again…,” he doesn’t mean, of course, that we should expect to see a robed and sandaled Jesus in the produce area at Kroger or the Nazarene passing us on the interstate in a Honda Civic. But he does mean to undermine all spiritualized notions of Christ’s resurrection . The resurrection is not some ethereal light of inspiration, some uplifting ideal that keeps us motivated. No, for McCabe, the resurrection takes root in history and experience and is palpable; Christ is present and at work in our lives in places that we can see and taste and smell and hear and touch. As the feminist theologian Elizabeth A. Johnson writes in Friends of God and Prophets,

    As the narratives of the Easter appearances make clear, henceforth [Jesus] is present through the power of the Spirit in word and sacrament, dwelling wherever two or three gather in his name, encountered as a stranger explaining the Scriptures as he walks along the road, recognized in the breaking of the bread, present where human wounds are touched and healed and, in a special way, served where the hungry receive bread, the thirsty drink, and the naked clothing.3

    In the spring of 2020, just as theologian Douglas Otatti was reviewing the page proofs for his new and innovative systematic theology, A Theology for the Twenty-fi rst Century, the nation swiftly entered the fi rst wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic was in so many ways unexpected and so sweeping in its rapid transformation of our society and our lives. A scholar crafting a theology for our century could hardly ignore what appeared to be a century-changing moment, but his book was


    Page 3

    already fi nished and ready for press. So Otatti penned an addendum to the “Preface” of his book in which he acknowledged the intrusion of the pandemic and said that it could be viewed theologically from the perspectives of both judgment and grace. The pandemic was judgment, he said, not in the sense of divine thunderbolts of wrath but as an exposure of the “deleterious consequences of our skewed devotions to partial interests and communities, our constricted fi elds of vision and attention, and the destructive actions and practices they support.”4 But, Otatti also said, we can look into the experience of the pandemic “for traces of grace and the kingdom.” And where are those? Otatti makes an “incomplete and anecdotal list” of these traces of kingdom grace, glimpses of the resurrection as it were, among them, hospital workers laboring in long and dangerous shifts, a preschool superintendent going to bat for her teachers to receive at least half pay even though the school was closed, and supermarket and pharmacy employees risking their lives to make sure that people can get the food and medicines they need.5 We might add to Otatti’s list: a daughter lovingly kissing the Facetime image of her father on her phone screen, saying goodbye, and praying with him as he dies alone in the ICU; a COVID nurse at her dinner break, seated by her computer screen with a cup of grape juice and a morsel of bread, participating in an online Eucharist; police offi cers kneeling alongside protesters at demonstrations following the deaths of George Floyd, Rayshard Brooks, and Breonna Taylor. Those of us who preach on Easter are not charged with elucidating the resurrection or even with making an apologetic defense of Easter faith to an agnostic culture. Indeed, we are not there to explain anything. We are there to proclaim with the women breathlessly returning from the cemetery, “The tomb is empty! He is not there. He is risen and alive! Jesus is loose in the world!” The Easter sermon does not move from doctrine to life, but the other way–from the announcement of the risen Christ at work in life to “Aha! So that’s what this is about. That is what our risen Lord is doing among us this day!”

    Losing Sight of the Resurrection In the fi rst congregation at Corinth, they loved their worship. People were speaking in tongues, being transported into ecstasy, fi nding deep communion and healing, understanding profound mysteries, giving themselves up to God and others, and more. The Lord’s Day at Corinth rocked. What irritated them, though, was the burden of believing the resurrection from the dead. “We have the passion and the fervor,” they said, “but of what use is it to believe in the resurrection?” Why not cut to the chase–an unfettered, experiential faith without the encrustation of resurrection? “Hogwash,” said Paul. “Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say there is no resurrection of the dead?” he carped. “If there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been in vain…. For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised. If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile….But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the fi rst fruits of those who have died”(from 1 Cor. 15:12-20). That may at fi rst appear to be logical reasoning–if this, then that–but it’s not. If it is logical reasoning, it’s faulty and circular. But what Paul is actually doing is appealing to their experience. “So, you trust the energy that ripples through your community, your worship, your life together?” says Paul. “Well, who do you think is the source


    Page 4

    of that energy? And if the Christ we preached to you is alive in your experience, and you know that’s true, then the preaching of Christ that stimulated your experience is true, and if that’s true, then Christ has been raised and there is a resurrection of the dead.” “Show me your resurrection,” the Zen master challenged the Trappist monk. Look at the love, look at the prophesy, look at the sacrifi ces, look at the washing of the feet and the care of the widow, look at the boldness of the saints, look at the awe and wonder. Glimpses of resurrection.

    Regaining Sight of the Resurrection But where do we look to see the risen Christ at work in our world? Each Gospel serves as its own guide to point to those places. Mark—Mark, for example, ends in what seems an abrupt halt; at least most scholars think so. The women at the tomb are given by the angelic young man two commands: not to be afraid and to go tell the disciples that the risen Christ will see them in Galilee. But the women fl ee in terror, saying nothing (Mark 16:6-8). That’s it. But then it dawns on the reader: we are now disciples, and we should return to Galilee to see the risen Jesus. In other words, go back to chapter one of Mark’s Gospel, back to Galilee, and read it all over again. Some say that the original text of Mark has no post-resurrection appearances, but that’s not so. Read a second time; the whole Gospel is composed of post-resurrection appearances. Where is the risen Christ? Precisely where he was the fi rst time. Back at work, preaching, teaching, calling, healing, cleansing, feeding, challenging oppression, and casting out demons. We should look for the risen Christ, then, especially in places where people suffer, where there is defeat, pain, and loss. There is Christ, standing at the bedside of those on ventilators, standing at graveside with those who grieve. The philosopher George Yancy recently published in the New York Times a series of interviews with people of different faiths about what they believed about death and faith. One of these interviews was with Christian theologian Karen Teel. Now, Yancy does not himself believe in God, and he told Karen Teel that physicist Stephen Hawking called faith in a God who brings life out of death “a fairy tale for people afraid of the dark.” He asked her, how do you as a Christian respond to the charge that Christians are simply “afraid of the dark.” Teel told Yancy that she had recently cared for her mother as she gradually lost her battle with A.L.S., a disease that had also claimed Stephen Hawking’s life. The disease was relentless and cruel, she said. Her mother had been an accomplished pianist, but at the end, her body had deteriorated to the place where Teel had to help her with everything: eating, using the bathroom, controlling her wheelchair, even breathing. But as she journeyed with her mother toward death, she found that in her sorrow, her own faith had been renewed. “Before facing my mother’s death,” she said, “I never really knew that I believed that life continues, but in caring for my mother, I discovered that I know it, as I know the sun will come up in the morning, as I know I’ll get wet in the rain, as I know I love my own children. It isn’t about fear. It’s a gift and a mystery, this conviction that we come from love and we return to love.”6 Luke—Luke, the Emmaus Road story is the key: the risen Christ can be seen in the breaking of the bread, in the sharing of bread, of people feeding one another, in


    Page 5

    human relationships healed and nourished by hope. My wife Kim, a pastor and a seminary teacher of liturgics, once told in a sermon of this experience after church one Sunday:

    When my husband and I lived in Atlanta, we worshiped at a church that had bread machines running in the sanctuary on communion Sundays, so that we could smell the bread of life even before it was time to eat it together at Christ’s table. Often there was bread left over after worship, and on one blessed Sunday, I got to take a loaf of it home. This was the perfect loaf of bread—sweet, lightly browned, crusty on the outside, soft on the inside—and still warm. Someone put it in a bag for me, and I carried it to my car like it was a baby. I was so hungry, and this bread was going to be so good. I got to my car, and I might have buckled the loaf of bread into the front seat. Then I started to make my way home. I headed up Peachtree Street (because almost all the streets in Atlanta are called Peachtree Street), then took a right onto Ellis, the last turn before the highway. And that’s when it happened. I looked ahead, and sitting on the sidewalk about thirty feet apart from one another, were two men, one younger, one older. They had nothing, no sleeping bags, no pieces of cardboard, no backpacks. And I knew what was going to happen next. I was going to have to give up my sweet loaf of bread, for clearly, they needed it more than I did. Reluctantly, I eased over to the curb and came to a stop. I motioned to the younger man, and he leapt up and came over to the car. “Here,” I said, handing him the still-warm loaf. “This is for you and that gentleman to share.” He took the bread, said thank you, and quickly made his way to the other man. And then, like a priest, he leaned down, broke the bread, and gave half away. Take. Bless. Break. Give. Right before my very eyes, these two men acted out the Lord’s Supper all over again there on a gritty sidewalk in the middle of Atlanta. It looked like a miracle.7

    John—The Gospel of John ends with several followers of Jesus fi nding the risen Christ in their own ways: the Beloved Disciple, Mary Magdalene, the disciples minus Thomas, and then Thomas himself. But we notice that the sequence comes to its climax with Thomas exclaiming, “My Lord and my God!” What he says is not the resolution of a quadrilateral equation; it is instead a hymn of astonished and sudden belief: “My Lord and my God!” Thomas sings. So the Gospel that begins in song, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God…,” moves at the end toward an everlasting song of resurrection: “My Lord and my God….” Perhaps, then, we should look for glimpses of the resurrection, among other places, in fragments of church choirs singing anthems on Sunday morning into empty sanctuaries while streaming to self-isolating congregations, in Zoom choruses singing the “Hallelujah Chorus” even in a time of quarantine, and to all places where human song marks the recognition that Christ’s light “shines in the darkness and the darkness has not


    Page 6

    overcome it.” In 1966 a coal mine disaster struck the Welsh village of Aberfan, killing scores of people, many of them children taken down while at their village school. In an episode of the television series “The Crown,” based on this disaster, Queen Elizabeth is portrayed as too distant and emotionally reserved to respond to the crisis. She even refuses to attend the funeral, sending her husband Prince Philip instead. At the funeral, the camera pans across an almost unbearably tragic sight: the villagers gathered in the cemetery before an open grave holding a row of the coffi ns of their lost children, dozens of them, one placed next to the other. Phillip weeps as the villagers, in profound grief, begin to sing Charles Wesley’s hymn “Jesus Lover of My Soul”:

    Other refuge have I none, Hangs my helpless soul on Thee; Leave, oh, leave me not alone, Still support and comfort me. All my trust on Thee is stayed, All my help from Thee I bring; Cover my defenseless head With the shadow of Thy wing.

    When Philip goes back to Buckingham Palace, the queen asks him, “How was it?” “Eighty-one children were buried today,” he tells her. “The rage…in all the faces, behind all the eyes. They didn’t smash things up. They didn’t fi ght in the streets.” “What did they do?” the queen asks. “They sang. The whole community. The most astonishing thing I ever heard.”

    When hope and trust in God, even in the midst of terrible loss, rise up in people’s throats as prayer and song, perhaps we have glimpsed the risen Christ moving through our lives, giving comfort to the grief-stricken. Matthew—Finally, there is Matthew. There at the end of that magisterial Gospel, the risen Christ sends the disciples to all the nations to teach others what Jesus has taught them. And as they go, the risen Christ promises to be with them “to the end of the age.” Perhaps, then, the risen Christ can be glimpsed when those who love Jesus tenderly teach others, as they have been taught. In a land of hard, rocky, and thorny soil, perhaps we glimpse the risen Christ wherever people hear the gospel with their hearts, wherever the love and mercy of the gospel take root in good soil and grow. The little town in which I live, Cambridge, Maryland, has two “Main Streets.” One is called “Race Street” (after horse races that were once held there), and it runs through the primarily white business district. The other is “Pine Street,” and it runs through the heart of the African American community. The two streets run parallel to each other, only a block apart, but they may as well be in different countries. In the 1950s and 1960s, Pine Street was at least as vibrant in terms of business as was Race Street. There were grocery stores, funeral homes, fl orist shops, druggists, and an incredible collection of musical venues. Since Cambridge is a midway point on the highway between the clubs in Norfolk and the music scene in Harlem, it was


    Page 7

    a convenient stopover for the great black musicians of the 40s, 50s, and 60s. Duke Ellington, Sara Vaughan, Ella Fitzgerald, James Brown, and Little Richard, among many other stars, appeared on Pine Street. The street had two nicknames: “Black Wall Street,” because it was fl ourishing, and “Groove City,” because of its vibe. Then, in the long, hot summer of 1967, in the midst of civil disturbances across the nation and the stirrings of local racial unrest, Pine Street burned to the ground. A fi re was set (by whom, no one knows to this day) in the all-black elementary school. The all-white volunteer fi re department refused to answer the call, and the school and several blocks of businesses were destroyed. The white-run banks wouldn’t lend money to the black merchants to rebuild, and Pine Street remains today a shadow of its former glory. On the former “Black Wall Street,” unemployment is now very high, and in “Groove City,” many of the houses are in deep disrepair. Even now the despairing lament “it would only have taken one fi re truck” is heard among African Americans. They walk where they are going on Pine Street and rarely stray onto Race Street, which continues as a symbol of white racism and violence. But after the death of George Floyd, some artists in the African American community came up with an idea. They made a proposal to the City Council, which astoundingly gave its unanimous approval. So, several artists from Pine Street brought rollers, brushes, and buckets of paint over to Race Street, where they were joined by white artists and ordinary citizens, black and white, and they painted a a large lovely “Black Lives Matter” mural down the center of Race Street. That was in June. Several weeks later, in the dead of the night, a pickup truck stopped in the middle of a deserted Race Street and began burning rubber up-anddown the new painting, defacing the art with cruel tire marks. Cambridge woke up the next morning to fi nd the “Black Lives Matter” artwork despoiled. When the police investigated, they discovered that a security camera on one of the stores on Race Street had recorded the truck in action. It turned out to be a distinctive-looking pickup, and the driver was soon identifi ed—a 21-year-old white man, a local who, Trump-like, hated all this agitation by black people. The main artist was contacted by the City Council, told of the destruction, and invited to repair the painting. She thought it over and replied that she had a different idea, maybe a better one. She invited the young man who defaced the art to have a conversation with her. Shocked and embarrassed that his deed of hate done under the cover of night was now public knowledge, he reluctantly agreed to meet with her. She told him she wanted him to know what it was like growing up black in Cambridge, and she asked him what it was like growing up white in town. They talked, exchanged experiences, and got to know each other. The artist explained to the young man what the phrase “Black Lives Matter” means to black folk. At one point, the young man broke down and said, “I am so sorry. What can I do?” The following Sunday afternoon, the young man and his parents went to Race Street and stood on the sidewalk next to the painting. They were joined by the artist plus about forty other townfolk, black and white. The young man stepped forward and made a public apology for what he had done. Then he took a paintbrush and joined the artist in the middle of the street. Instead of painting over the damage, the artist had another vision. At the top of each tire tread, the artist and the young man painted the blooms of beautiful fl owers. The marks of the tires were now the stems of roses.


    Page 8

    No one believes this event has healed over the great racial divide that exists in our town nor has it made a huge dent in the racism that pervades our community. Even as the young man and the artist worked together to paint the fl owers, the mocking sounds of other young men gunning the engines of their pickups and burning rubber could be heard in the surrounding streets, and some African American parents at the Sunday event wondered out loud whether the next time their sons get in trouble with the law, the same zeal for reconciliation rather than punishment would prevail. But at least some in town had learned the words of mercy and righteousness that Jesus taught us, and what happened in the middle of Race Street is perhaps a glimpse of reconciliation, what the New Testament would call “a sign and a wonder” of the Easter reign of God. To look for such rays of resurrection light amid the gloom is surely part of what we call faith. To trust these glimpses more than the darkness as the sure harbinger of the fullness of Christ’s kingdom is surely part of what we mean by hope. To be drawn into the signs and wonders with our labors and our whole heart is surely part of what we mean by love.

    Notes 1 Carl Scovel, Never Far from Home: Stories from the Radio Pulpit (Boston: Skinner House Books, 2004), 124-125. 2 Herbert McCabe O.P., God Still Matters (New York: Continuum, 2002), 226, 228. 3 Elizabeth A. Johnson, Friends of God and Prophets: A Feminist Theological Reading of the Communion of Saints (New York: Continuum, 1998), 209-210. 4 Douglas F. Otatti, A Theology for the Twenty-fi rst Century (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2020), xxv. 5 Ibid., xxvi. 6 George Yancy, “I Believed That I Would See Her Again: A Christian Theologian Recounts How Her Mother’s Death Affi rmed Her Faith and Belief in the Afterlife,” The New York Times, May 20, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/20/opinion/christianity-death-afterlife.html. 7 Kimberly Bracken Long, “Loaves and Fishes,” a communion sermon, unpublished.

  • God’s Judgment (but Mostly Our Own) in Times of Crisis

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 17

    God’s Judgment (but Mostly Our Own) in Times of Crisis

    David S. Cunningham

    Hope College, Holland, Michigan

    How might we think about God’s judgment of the world in the midst of a severe and ongoing public health crisis? The biblical authors experienced (and wrote about) such events through the category of plague. This category continued to be part of the experience of the faithful through most of Christian history. Today, those of us who live in the industrialized West have much less experience with “plagues,” so we similarly fi nd ourselves with much less experience in thinking about them, and about how to respond to them. On all fronts—medically, politically, economically, culturally—we are just not quite sure what to make of what is happening to us at this moment. And theologically, as well: we are also not quite sure what God may be doing at this moment. In a special article written for Journal for Preachers in March 2020 titled “Reaping the Whirlwind,” Walter Brueggemann explored three interpretive options for what he called “a God-linked reality of the plague.” After his trademark detailed analysis of Old Testament texts, he summarized three perspectives on God’s role in a plague:

    • A transactional quid pro quo that issues in punishment for violators; • A purposeful mobilization of negative force in order to effect God’s own intent; and • A raw holiness that refuses and defies our best explanations.

    Then, just as the reader is trying to imagine how to work these points into a sermon , Brueggemann deftly pulls out the rug: “None of these interpretive options,” he writes, “is of much use or interest in the midst of the virus.” (“Whew,” we respond, “thank goodness. I don’t think my congregation would have appreciated a sermon on any of those three points.”) But this is not all that Brueggemann has to offer. Both in this article and in the small book on the subject that has since appeared (Virus as a Summons to Faith: Biblical Refl ections in a Time of Loss, Grief, and Uncertainty), he pushes his readers further. He allows that the current pandemic does not give us the leisure of lingering too long over these interpretive categories of biblical faith. But we are still drawn to wrestle with them, and we should allow ourselves to be so drawn. “In the midst of our immediate preoccupation with our felt jeopardy and our hope for relief,” he writes, “our imagination does indeed range beyond the immediate to larger, deeper wonderments.” He mentions the views of his friend Peter Block, who suggests that “the virus is God’s way of ending consumerism.” He goes on to suggest some of the things that, in the midst of an acute public health crisis, are being judged and found wanting: self-indulgence, Enlightenment rationality, globalist attempts to master the earth. Perhaps the object of divine judgment in this plague is not the pain felt by those who are affl icted by the virus, nor the compromised political structures that have failed adequately to respond to it, but rather our own hubris-fi lled effort to treat God’s good creation as a mere instrument for our passing pleasure. This interpretation would, indeed, lead us to think differently about all three of the Old Testament perspectives


    Page 18

    that Brueggemann makes salient in his essay. “In our imagined autonomy we have, in the global narrative, been on a spree of self-indulgence and self-actualization that has exercised little regard for the neighbor. And now we are required to wonder more deeply.” In this essay, I intend to take up Brueggemann’s charge to “wonder more deeply.” I want to begin by refl ecting further on the category of divine judgment, with special focus on a few New Testament texts. I will then return to our present moment—and to how we might think more deeply about it in light of the biblical witness.

    I “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged” (Matt. 7:1): everyone’s favorite verse to quote when being judged by others—and least favorite to have fl ung immediately back in one’s face when having recently rendered a marvelously just judgment . And, like so many of Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount, seemingly impossible to fulfi ll: take no thought for tomorrow, store up no treasures on earth, cut off your hand if it causes you to sin. Almost none of us follow these precepts to the letter—just as we go on judging. Indeed, this particular precept—against judgment —is probably among the most diligently ignored of all of Jesus’ sayings in the Sermon. In spite of its clarity, we go on making judgments—of all kinds—all day long. We seem relatively convinced that, on some level, this saying must not mean quite what it seems to say. So then, what do we think Jesus is doing here? Demanding a level of holiness that most people will never attain, and condemning us for our failures? (Matt. 5:20: “Unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.”) Or is he giving us something for which to struggle, knowing that our reach will exceed our grasp? (Matt. 6:33: “Strive fi rst for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.”) Is he perhaps knowingly setting an impossible standard, so that we will always remember that God can do infi nitely more than we can ask or imagine? (Matt. 19:25-26: “‘Then who can be saved?’…‘For mortals it is impossible, but for God all things are possible.’”) All of these approaches have been suggested, in many different forms, throughout the history of the interpretation of Matthew’s gospel. Indeed, one might well argue that some combination of these interpretive strategies was taken up by one of Jesus’ very fi rst interpreters. Throughout his epistles, Paul reminds his readers that all efforts to follow the law, no matter how zealous and thoroughgoing they may be, are ultimately in vain. We will never be fully justifi ed by following all the rules. Our salvation is brought about by God’s grace, to which we respond with faith. Our failures to abide by Jesus’ counsels of perfection are met not with God’s altogether just judgment, but with forgiveness. This does not mean, as Paul regularly emphasizes, that we should sin all the more so that grace might abound. (“By no means!”) Still, our sinfulness is not primarily defi ned as our failure to follow certain rules and regulations. This brings us back to the question that we asked above: what exactly is Jesus doing , in the Sermon on the Mount, when providing us with precepts that we will never follow in their entirety? Perhaps he is saying something like this: “Go ahead—try to be like God. It’s a worthy calling. But know that you will fail; and when you fail, you will learn exactly what it means to be a human being.” In other words, we will


    Page 19

    discover that we are, simultaneously, very much like God, and yet not at all like God. We will come to understand what it means to be created (as the author of Genesis insists that we are) in the image and likeness of God—which is to say, similar in many ways, but different as well. An image of something is, after all, not the same as the thing itself. As we go about trying not to worry about tomorrow, as we seek to avoid storing up treasure, as we do our best not to lay ourselves open to judgment, we experience a taste of the freedom and power of God. But in our failure to achieve these things, we also experience the limits and weaknesses that are inherent in being the image, and not the thing itself. As we strive for these things, we experience the freedom that allows us to do so; but we also discover that our freedom still has its limits. It is a fi nite freedom; it is not the infi nite freedom that belongs to God alone. And with respect to judgment in particular, wouldn’t it be nice if I were able to render judgments, to know that I’m always judging justly, and yet not be subject to the judgment of others? That’s what it’s like to be God. But I am not God, which means that I will sometimes (often?) judge wrongly and that others will judge me as well (and may sometimes be right in their judgments). Of course, this knowledge will not stop me from making judgments of all kinds—providing just one more reminder, as if one were needed, that I am, indeed, not God.

    II God does judge, of course. Walter Brueggemann’s survey of Old Testament texts provides ample evidence of that truth, as would a thoroughgoing survey of New Testament passages. But we who read these texts are rarely content to stop with the simple, straightforward, and relatively safe claim that “God judges.” Instead, we want to be able to say something about what God judges, how God judges, and most important of all, whom God judges. Having accepted and underscored God’s sovereignty in rendering judgment, we simply can’t resist violating that sovereignty by letting everyone know just who is being judged (or will be judged) by God. While we’re at it, we enjoy making pronouncements as to exactly which of their actions will be judged, and according to precisely what terms. “God alone will judge,” we solemnly and piously declare. But we don’t let “God alone” determine the warrants for these judgments, nor their targets and outcomes. We happily intervene in God’s work to inform everyone about the specifi cs. The circumstances here are parallel to Christian speculations about the ultimate judgment of God: the acceptance of a person into God’s complete presence in heaven, or the banishment of a person to the complete absence of God in hell. This is, of course, God’s judgment to render, and God’s alone; but that rarely deters us from speculating, or perhaps even declaring, that certain persons will burn in hell for their otherwise unpunished crimes, or that others will bask in the light of heaven as a reward for the sacrifi ces made in their lives. The temptation to make such claims is obvious. I freely admit that, having heard some morsel of news about someone who has done something truly barbaric and has not paid the price, I have often imagined the perpetrator in very fi ery surroundings, where there is much weeping and gnashing of teeth. But in each case that I so imagine my enemy’s fate, I wrongly appropriate the work of divine judgment to myself, taking it away from God. For God will decide that person’s fate, not I; and God may in fact decide it in ways which I would not approve . So much the worse for me; for the judgments of the Lord are, as the Psalmist


    Page 20

    reminds us, not subject to our approval. Rather, they are—in and of themselves—true and righteous altogether. Augustine writes that not only the world as a whole, but even the church itself, is a corpus permixtum: a mixed body, fi lled with people whose lives seem to overfl ow with goodness, and also with those who seem to lack goodness to an astonishing degree. And God will sort them out (has already sorted them out, in fact); some will enjoy the divine presence forever, and some will be separated from God for all eternity. These are the elements of Augustine’s teachings that we appreciate in those moments when trying to make sense of the unpunished crimes and the uncriticized failures of others. We like to quote these teachings, reminding people of the potential fate of the unjust. But we do not usually go on to point out that Augustine also made it very clear that we have no information whatsoever as to who will be judged as deserving of heaven and who will be abandoned to hell. And by “no information whatsoever,” he really means it: none. We probably can’t do much to prevent ourselves from speculating on exactly who is destined for which forms of judgment. We may even announce our convictions on the subject from time to time (and, when particularly incensed, do so to the face of those we consider destined to the nether regions). But it’s all just so much wasted breath: we do not know, and we have no criteria that we can use to render such a judgment. To return from Augustine and the fi nal judgment to the Bible and immediate judgment: as is often the case, we should let Jesus’s own words guide us. He certainly understood the human tendency to try to extract information about the outcome of God’s judgment on the basis of what we see happening in our world. But he reminded us of the dangers of doing so by offering the simplest possible image: that of sun and rain. God, we are told, “makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous” (Matt. 5:45). It would be diffi cult to imagine how Jesus could have made this point any clearer: we cannot determine the moral qualities of others, nor God’s judgment of their qualities, simply on the basis of what good or bad things befall them.

    III Most of my observations thus far apply in broad terms to all aspects of God’s judgment (and ours). What is it about our present circumstances that makes these questions particularly urgent? The fi rst answer, I think, is that any moment of crisis sharpens these kinds of questions for us. We are faced with diffi culties that are beyond our immediate understanding, so we naturally look for reasons. We imagine that God is acting in one of the ways that Brueggemann describes in his article: a quid pro quo, an act of force to bring about God’s will, or a demonstration of God’s ultimate unknowability. Alternatively, we point to particular persons or groups that are most seriously affected by the crisis and imagine that they are the real object of the judgment . We are faced with an invisible virus that is causing overwhelming death and destruction, so it is hardly surprising that we are looking for answers and leaning toward any explanation that might make even a small modicum of sense. In a crisis, all of our ordinary, everyday misunderstandings of divine judgment become larger, more pressing, more oppressive. And the same is true with respect to our other habitual theological errors. If we already tend toward works-righteousness (given the assumptions embedded in capitalism, meritocracy, and retributive justice),


    Page 21

    we will tend even more in that direction when faced with extreme diffi culties. If we are prone to idolatry (our worship of the nation, of technocracy, or even of our favorite sports teams), then we will become even more worshipful of these idols when faced with the pressure of wars, natural disasters, or pandemics. And if we are already likely to usurp God’s judgment as our own, we will automatically do more of the same in a crisis. This is why, in the face of the rise of National Socialism in Germany, the Swiss theologian Karl Barth urged Christians to “go on as though nothing had happened.” That comment was widely misunderstood as promoting a kind of quietism, a failure to respond to a great evil that was overtaking the world. But Barth was fully aware that Naziism needed to be condemned and opposed by Christians; indeed, he was instrumental in the drafting of the Barmen declaration and the formation of the Confessing Church. What Barth meant was that, in a time of extraordinary crisis, we need to hold fast to what we already know to be true, and not capitulate to the pressures of the moment. He knew that, because of these pressures, we will be tempted to fi nd solutions to our problems that are completely out of line with our most fundamental beliefs. We will use the present crisis as an excuse to do whatever we wanted to do anyway, without attention to the fact that those actions are wrong. I remember invoking Barth’s phrase when I was asked to preach shortly after the tragedy of September 11, 2001. In the days immediately following the attacks, a great many Christians across the country were calling for various forms of revenge upon the attackers, or rather—since the attackers themselves all died in the attacks—revenge upon those thought to be responsible for inspiring or promoting the attacks. This in turn led to some deplorable anti-Muslim words and actions from Christians who ought to have known better. This is what Barth meant by “going on as though nothing had happened”: not that we should fail to mourn and grieve for those who died, nor that we should ignore the tragedy. Rather, he was reminding us not to allow horrible events of the moment to cause us to abandon our most basic principles—to forget everything that Jesus ever said about loving enemies and not returning evil for evil.

    IV So, is the present global pandemic a sign of God’s judgment? Possibly. But it would be a mistake to take another step beyond this claim and to make statements about exactly what is being judged, or how, or which persons are being judged. We would, in so doing, be taking away God’s exclusive power to render defi nitive judgments , and appropriating it to ourselves. All too often, our claims about the specifi city of God’s judgments are really our own judgments in disguise. Certainly, we can speculate; we can use our imaginations, as Brueggemann suggests , and consider who or what might be being judged at this particular moment in human history. I certainly resonate with the speculations of his friend Peter Block, about God’s judgment of our self-indulgence and our conceit that we might master the earth. But others will claim, in ways that are persuasive to the audiences that they address, that what is really being judged is the idea that governments need to intervene to control diseases, or that people should not be allowed to immigrate, or that modern medicine will save us. Or, more perniciously, that true believers are immune from the virus, or that recovery is a clear sign of innate goodness, or that certain racial or


    Page 22

    ethnic groups somehow deserve the disproportionate impact that the disease has had on their communities. All of these notions—the ones that appeal to us, as well as the ones that appall us—are attempts on the part of human beings to render judgment. It does not matter that our judgments are cloaked in the claim that God is rendering d these judgments; in making that claim, we are transferring the power of judgment to ourselves. But do we not gain at least some guidance from the Bible about those things that God will judge most harshly? We do; but, as Brueggemann notes in his Old Testament survey, much of this guidance is fairly broad and vague. God’s judgment is rendered against “those who forsake the Lord” or those who defy God through their hubris. In the New Testament, matters are rarely more specifi c; judgment is proclaimed on those who refuse to listen (Matt. 10:14–15), who fail to repent (Matt. 11:20–24), or who utter careless words (Matt. 12:36). Sometimes, the judgment is quite mystifying; think of the workers in the vineyard, chastised for asking that payment for labor be proportional to the work performed (Matt. 20: 11–15). Or the sad fate of the wedding guest, who had responded to the apparently extravagant announcement that anyone could attend, only to be called out for not wearing the proper clothing. And not only called out—for “the king said to the attendants, ‘Bind him hand and foot, and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matt. 22:13). The diffi culty with all of this language is the diffi culty that we face in applying it to the specifi c circumstances that we face at the present moment. The proximate causes of God’s judgment are either very general (forsaking or defying God, failing to listen or to repent) or far too specifi c (as in many of the parables). In either case, these descriptions are all too easily “fi lled in” with whatever strikes the interpreter as particularly ripe for judgment. Who has “forsaken the Lord” and brought down judgment upon us in the shape of a pandemic? More pointedly, why has the United States borne a particularly high proportion of the cases and the deaths? Is it because the country is run by charlatans and scoundrels? So some would say. Is it because we allow abortion and countenance diverse gender identities and sexual orientations? So others would say. (“And of course, those people would be wrong,” I would say—but there I go again.) Is it because we have too strictly separated church and state? Or not separated them enough? Is it because we have failed to give alms to the poor, or because we have forgotten that the poor will always be with us? All of these claims about the warrants for God’s judgment can be supported with reasonable-sounding theological arguments and a surfeit of biblical quotations. And all of them represent attempts on our part to take the act of judgment away from God and to make it our own.

    V What, then, are we to say? Can we make no theological claims about the current pandemic? We can, I think, speak and write about what we are learning from the experience , including the theological insights that we have gained. We can pay attention to, and take advantage of, the many new ways that we are discovering to reach out to one another and to take care of one another. We can give careful consideration to the structures and systems that have contributed to our current misery and seek to ameliorate them. And, because we have often been denied the option of coming together


    Page 23

    in a common space for worship and word and sacrament, we have been reminded of the importance of doing so when we can. And at the same time, we have discovered that we can make use of the tools that are available to us in order to bridge the gap, at least temporarily, between the physical presence that we wish for and the virtual presence that we can achieve. All these are important insights, and they have deep theological implications. But none of them require us to make specifi c claims about God’s judgment: neither what, nor how, nor who is being judged. But there is at least one biblical passage to which we can turn in our intense desire to understand how certain human actions are judged by God. That passage does not, I should emphasize, have anything to say about the concrete shape that such judgment will take; it does not say that those who are weighed in the balance and found wanting will be struck down with the plague, nor that they will suffer any other specifi c form of earthly punishment. So this passage is not particularly useful in determining what or how or whom God is judging through the current pandemic. It is, however, useful in helping us think about how we are called to react and to respond. In the account of the last judgment (Matt. 25:31–46), the judge is described as rendering judgment on people according to their actions: those who have fed the hungry, clothed the naked, and cared for the sick will inherit the kingdom, and those who have failed to do so will not. This passage has always struck me as particularly clear and very diffi cult to misinterpret; still, given the degree to which it is routinely ignored by many Christians, it must not be clear to everyone. It is one of the very few biblical passages that describes specifi c actions—actions that require little or no “translation” across time, space, and culture—that will be judged in specifi c ways. And yet we spend much more of our time speculating on what kind of judgment is being rendered in cases for which we have no biblical evidence whatsoever. So, if we seek to learn something about divine judgment, let us at least learn this: the Bible does not provide us with defi nitive answers about who or what is being t judged in the midst of the current pandemic. It does not reveal precisely “what God is doing” to us, or in us, or through us, by means of this virus. But the Bible does have something to offer as to how we should respond to it—and as to how we will be judged for what we do, or fail to do, for those who are affected by it. “Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.”

  • The Thin Place in the Heart of God: All Saints Day 2021

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 27

    The Thin Place in the Heart of God

    All Saints Day 2021

    Valerie Bridgeman

    Methodist Theological School in Ohio, Delaware, Ohio

    In 1984, the movie Places in the Heart featured Sally Fields and Danny Glover. Fields plays a widow whose husband died suddenly and who was left to figure out how to make a living from the 40-acre farm they had.1 Glover’s character was a “hobo” who showed up on her steps for food and stayed to work the farm. In some sense, they become “family” in a community and time—central Texas in Depression era United States—when a white woman and her children and a black man in community together would have been in danger. Indeed, in the movie, though the plotline of the Klan was not developed, at least one scene hinted at the racial tension. While I thought of this movie as I reflected on the texts for and the meaning of All Saints’ Day, what I remembered about this movie was its ending. The last scene is in a church that we have not seen anywhere else in the movie. And the people are receiving and sharing communion among themselves. And the people are both living and dead. Read that again: at the communion, the last scene of this movie, the people receiving communion are both living and dead. Often when approaching All Saints’ Day, I think of this movie and of Dia de los Muertos, the Day of the Dead, which originated in Mexico, though it currently is celebrated through Latin America and its diaspora. According to the National Geographic site, “Dia de los Muertos draws on indigenous Aztec rituals and Catholicism, which is why it becomes connected with All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day (November 1 and 2).”2 The celebration is not one of mourning, but of dancing and food, singing and laughter. Participants are to remember that the dead are just beyond us and stay alive because we remember them. Some of this joining of what looks like Halloween and “evil,” particularly to more conservative Christians, has been rejected. I do not make this observation regarding conservative upbringings in a pejorative way. I grew up in such an environment, though I think my environs were more generous than I have heard from some of my friends. But we were told to be “careful” playing with the demonic (what my holiness father considered Halloween to be) and trying to communicate with the dead. All these years later, I remember some of those admonitions. And, even as we were allowed limited trick-or-treating in our small town, as I grew older in our holiness churches, more people insisted on holding All Hallows’ Eve gatherings in the church fellowship hall, playing bible games, and if children were allowed to dress up, they were asked to do so as a bible character. They often renamed the night, in an attempt to distance the church for the “worldly” celebration. I remember vividly discussions about how King Saul disobeyed God by engaging with a witch (!) who called up the dead prophet Samuel (1 Samuel 28:3–25) as a cautionary tale to warn us against “playing with the dead,” since it was akin to playing with demons. Such a story may sound odd to some, since for many mainline Christians Halloween has always been a day of fun and candy, and effectively divorced from the Catholic understanding of All Saints’ Day or the Mexican Day of the Dead, where dressing as a


    Page 28

    skeleton or some other other-worldly creature is a part of honoring those who have gone before. As I turn toward the revised lectionary texts for this year’s All Saints’ Day, I share with you just one more story. When I was 9, my mother’s father died from an aggressive form of cancer. I grew up in the era when children were not allowed to visit sick people in the hospital, and my grandfather—a 40-acre farmer owner who also was a janitor at a local hospital—landed in the hospital where we could not see him. Nearly 60 years later, I remember still the forlorn feeling of not being able to see him. And my mother and grandmother did not explain to any of us that he was terminal. I don’t know whether that was because they didn’t know or because they believed it was too much for children as young as we were. But the night my grandfather Paw Paw (Kempis Julius McKinney) died, I was in my bed in our small home in the country. And he “visited” me. I mean by this statement that I had an ethereal encounter with my grandfather. He was not in a body; he was see-through, and he talked with me. He told me not to be afraid. He said that he would be with me and that God loves me. I was not asleep. When my mother came home from the hospital, I ran to tell her that Paw Paw had come to visit me and told her what he had said. She grew pale, and she asked me to repeat it. This time, I told her what time the visitation occurred. When I was in my twenties, she told me that the time I had told her was the exact time he was pronounced dead at the hospital. But that night she had told me never to repeat the story again. I was confused and hurt, but it was not until I was in my 20s that I repeated the story, told my siblings, and talked through it with a counselor. I was in a faith crisis in those years and had begun to have dreams of my Gran Gran who was dead by then but did not come to me like Paw Paw. The dreams were vivid and full of information about how she made teas and for what ailments. At the time, I was in the bed for chronic bronchitis and barely able to breathe. I was praying constantly with every cough and fever and being visited every night. It was remembering those visitations that made me start taking All Saints’ Day seriously. I started meditating on Hebrews 12:1 and thinking that my grandparents are a part of the Great Cloud of Witnesses that surround us and cheer us on. I started reading African based spirituality and remembering how my dad, my holiness preacher dad, liked to tell ghost stories. He would tell us, “There are haints (his word for ghosts) out there. We don’t see them because of all these lights now, but they are there, and they will make themselves known if you want to know them.” I started remembering how my Gran Gran would put out food and a bowl of water when someone “crossed over” from this life into the next life so that their journey would be easier, and how she would cover the mirrors during a wake. I have since learned that this tradition of covering the mirrors so that the soul of the dead person does not get trapped crosses many ethnic traditions around the world.3 In Celtic spirituality, my encounters with my ancestors would have occurred at a thin place, a place on earth where crossing between earth and other realms (e.g., heaven, the underworld, where fairies lived, etc.) is easily accessed. What I have come to believe is that death, the portal to another life, is the thin place that reveals God’s heart for humanity. Perhaps when Wisdom of Solomon 3:1-4 observes that the “souls of the righteous are in the hand of God” (v.1),4 that it is only in the “eyes of the foolish they seemed to have died” (v.2), “they are at peace” (v.3), and “their hope is full of immortality” (v.4), we see a glimpse of that thin place. It is


    Page 29

    foolish to think that the dearly departed are departed at all. When African American Christians sometimes refuse to even use the phrase “they died” but rather “they passed on” or “they crossed over,” perhaps they have tuned into these notions reflected in this text. I am aware that we do not often preach from Wisdom of Solomon, but for this All Saints’ Day, perhaps we should consider this text and allow the stories of the dearly departed to arise. Perhaps we should have a full-on intertextual dialogue for the season and also consider allowing the hope of the resurrection to ascend, where those who have left this plane are free of the limitations of human bodily existence, though not free from human emotions. Indeed, the book of Revelation tells us that God will “wipe every tear from their eyes. Death will be no more; mourning and crying and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed away” (Rev. 21:4). As I use the term “intertextual ,” I would include the lives and stories of the people to contemplate the thin line of God’s grace where we remind ourselves of the assurance reflected in the 1983 statement written for the Presbyterian Church (USA): “in life and in death, we belong to God.”5 We might remind our listeners that the “we” in the statement of faith may mean only Christians who have trusted in God, but in the Isaiah text for this lectionary (Isa. 25:6-9), we learn that God provides a feast for “all peoples” (v.6) and that God swallows up death for “all peoples” and “all nations” over which a shroud is spread (v. 7). Just as in the Revelation text, God wipes away tears for everyone. Preachers might challenge those of us in confessional denominations to consider whether we believe the confessions we speak, like the one above that I mention or any of the ancestral confessions of the saints who have crossed the thin line of God’s grace and who now are in the great cloud of witnesses. Do we, in fact, believe in the communion of saints?6 Are we open to the daily scene of the saints being with us, those unlikely people at the table of communion, like in the movie Places in the Heart? Is it not good news to contemplate our ongoing relationship in the whole of God’s heart with people who have “crossed over,” but who feast at the communion table with us? In a world so burdened as it has been since early 2020 with a global pandemic, it is not magical thinking to imagine this grace, but rather a part of our faith. How do we frame the conversation so that we honor our tears (not asking people not to cry), especially since “Jesus wept” in the John text for this season (John 11:32-44)? How do we honor the grief and sorrows that attend the human experience and avoid suggesting that to cry is somehow faithless? Remember, when we preach that in John’s gospel, the people interpreted Jesus’ tears as he speaks to Lazarus’s sister Mary with these words: “See how he loved him!” (v. 36). I have a friend who reminds me every time someone dear to me dies that we grieve, not merely because we have lost someone we love, but because we have lost someone who loves us. While preachers have interpreted “Jesus wept” in theological term, e.g., Jesus was grieved because Mary and Martha (and the other disciples) did not believe in the resurrection or in his power, I prefer his grief, even as he was familiar with the thin place between the living and dead. Maybe the preacher could help people tap into that hopeful grief on All Saints’ Day, remembering such love with joy in the midst of grief. Perhaps it is a time to emphasize the thin place that uncovers the heart of God. There has been so much loss due to the global pandemic that I imagine people might be uncomfortable in the communion of grief. But if the preacher can tap into John’s story about Lazarus’s


    Page 30

    resurrection, it may help people face their grief, their uncertainties, and even their anger. We have not received our dead back, as Mary and Martha did in John’s account. We may have covered the mirrors or had a repast meal with a few people to tell the stories of our dead and to honor them—even if we had to do it over some distance platform like Zoom. If we did, these gatherings were among our encounters with the thin places where our longing meets God’s heart for humanity. And All Saints’ Day is a perfect time to tap into such preaching.

    Notes 1 For a review, more about the cast, and some clips of the movie, see the following site, https://www. imdb.com/title/tt0087921/, accessed July 28, 2021. 2 “Dia de los Muertos,” https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/dia-de-los-muertos/, accessed July 28, 2021. 3 Growing up in our family, it was a “given” that the mirrors would be covered, especially if the person died in the home or the wake was held in the home. I never knew why, and learning these practices in order to understand our relationship to and with those who have died continues to fascinate me. See these websites for more information. You might fi nd interesting Caitlin Doughty, From Here to Eternity: Traveling the World to Find a Good Death (New York: W.W. Norton & Company; Reprint Edition, 2018). These websites may also be of interest: Lucie Sarr, “African Traditional Religion and the Veneration of Ancestors,” LaCroix International, https://international.la-croix.com/news/culture/african-traditionalreligion -and-the-veneration-of-ancestors/12277, accessed July 28, 2021. See also, “Covering Mirrors in House of Mourning,” https://www.aish.com/atr/Covering-Mirrors-in-House-of-Mourning.html,accessed , July 28, 2021; Klaudia Krystyna, “Why Do Some Cultures Cover Mirrors After a Death? https://www. joincake.com/blog/covering-mirrors-after-death/, accessed July 28, 2021. 4 All scriptural excerpts are from the New Revised Standard Version used by the Revised Common Lectionary. 5 “The Brief Statement of Faith,” Presbyterian Mission Agency, https://web.archive.org/ web/20120728223725/http://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/101/brief-statement-faith/, accessed August 3, 2021. 6 In the fi nal stanza of the Apostles’ Creed, https://www.umc.org/en/content/apostles-creed-traditionalecumenical , accessed August 3, 2021.

  • For the Living of These Days: From the Front Lines of Ministry

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 39

    For the Living of These Days:

    From the Front Lines of Ministry

    Mark Ramsey, The Ministry Collaborative, Charlottesville, Virginia With Kristy Farber, Matt Fitzgerald, Sarah Hayden, Jennifer Maxell, Adam Mixon, and Sam Wells

    In her astonishing life, Pauli Murray, the twentieth-century American civil rights activist, lawyer, women’s rights activist, author, and Episcopal priest, published just one volume of poetry. In the midst of “Dark Testament: Verse 8,” she writes,

    Hope is a song in a weary throat. Give me a song of hope And a world where I can sing it.

    Almost a year into our experiences with the global pandemic, every reader of these pages is well acquainted with a deep sense of weariness, along with a renewed urgency for the needs of our world. Searching for a song of hope has become an “other duties as may be assigned” item on every pastor’s job description. Rather than describe what we already know, we thought it wise to hear some dispatches from the front lines of ministry as we prepare for a second season of Lent in this de-centered world. Six of our colleagues were generous to take a moment to report what they are experiencing and learning. The reports are about preaching, and also about ritual, justice, trust, and risk. From diverse ministry settings, each refl ects a faithfulness and attention to the contours and challenges of ministry in the multiple crises and upheavals of this past year. Like almost every preacher this year, March 2020 found Matt Fitzgerald having to adapt creatively and imaginatively to a new reality.

    Matt Fitzgerald, senior pastor of St Paul’s United Church of Christ, Chicago (www. spucc.org) I used to preach in a rat-a-tat style, full of asides and long sentences. But in my current church, the ceiling stretches toward the heavens. The room echoes. I preach in a loud voice at a deliberate pace, heavy with repetition. I have become intense. I wave my arms for emphasis. I crack jokes to get some warmth across. When the pandemic struck, we leapt to video. I started preaching from my offi ce. My style looked bizarre on an iPod screen. The format calls for Mr. Rogers, and I had become Rev. Mussolini. I felt for Kimberly Guilfoyle when she spoke at the Republican National Convention. Her content repulsed me, but I sympathized with her approach. She was going for it! Kimberly, I know your pain. You are not the only person to bomb while hollering applause lines at a camera in an empty room. I’ve done it multiple Sundays in a row. I don’t know any preachers who preach regularly and think they’re bad at it. Self-delusion helps us step into the pulpit. The camera kills the lie. I readjusted. Six months into the pandemic, I sit in a comfortable chair and bring the camera as close as I can. I try to speak gently. I don’t tell as many jokes, and I illustrate my efforts


    Page 40

    with photographs and paintings. I am calm. I don’t know if it’s working. How can I spark a response to revelation when I am in the room alone? Then again, how could I ever do it? I remind myself of what Karl Barth said: “As ministers we must speak of God. We are human, however, and so cannot speak of God. We ought therefore to recognize both our obligation and our inability and by that very recognition give God the glory.” So I keep preaching, giving God the glory, wincing as I watch myself.

    Mark Ramsey In our daily work with The Ministry Collaborative—encompassing work with 600+ pastors and congregations across 21 denominations (and non-denominational churches), an awareness has emerged that the pandemic has not introduced much that is new. It has, however, revealed many things that were just under the surface and accelerated every trend that was already at work in recent years. That has increased the pressure in many areas of ministry, but it is also good news where the global upheaval has aided diverse voices to claim long-delayed attention. We cannot separate the hard terrain of 2020 from the renewed attention and striving for racial justice and equity.

    Jennifer Maxell, co-pastor of Breakthrough Fellowship (AME), Atlanta(https://breakthroughfellowship .org) The Breakthrough Fellowship is a medium size church that was planted 10 years ago after being birthed as a Bible study in our home by my husband Rev. Charles A. Maxell, Jr. and me. Before the pandemic, our church was engaged in looking for a new location to worship, as we had outgrown our current location. Six months later and we are still discerning where God would have us go, which has added an additional layer of uncertainty as we navigate the issues of reopening and connecting with our members. As a primarily African American congregation, the past six months have been a time of pain and frustration as we have navigated the increased risk and illness of our members to COVID 19 in conjunction with the latest instances of racial injustice. Our motto is “All About God. All About People,” which has manifested in a strong emphasis on community outreach and justice work. While we have hosted several virtual town halls with key stakeholders in our community (ex. Smyrna Police Chief, Smyrna School Board Members, etc.), it has been a challenge to galvanize our congregation in this season. Currently, we are actively engaged with Black Church PAC to get our members and those in our community to the polls. As a newer worshipping community, building culture is always a constant as is managing a shallow organizational structure. As this time of dislocation persists, these two factors are becoming more problematic even as we seek to shore them up.

    Sara Hayden, host of the New Way podcast and director of apprenticeships and residencies for 1001 New Worshiping Communities movement (https://www.presbyterianmission .org/ministries/1001-2/our-team/sara-hayden-bio/) Six months into the COVID-19 reality in the USA, the 1001 New Worshipping Communities movement of the PCUSA has celebrated the ordinations of not one but three leaders to the Ministry of Word and Sacrament…via Zoom. April Alkema,


    Page 41

    resident and co-pastor at Woven, kicked us off in late March as eight people stood six feet apart in the church sanctuary in Fresno, California, and the rest of us watched online, each at home in our own personal square-shaped sacred space. April placed her own red stole, a gift from the church, over her shoulders. I recall being moved by the symbolism, her profound choice to do ministry in this time, when words and action and truth hang in fragile balance. During the short service, two members of Woven led us in song from their living room couch. Several young kids watched the whole thing, tucked under their guardian’s arm. April’s mom, not able to be in California, beamed proudly. People “attended” April’s ordination that would have never been able to otherwise—a grandmother, someone who was sick, little children, people from her hometown and those from throughout the presbytery she now serves. We saw one another’s living rooms/bedrooms/makeshift offi ces and backyards, and the everyday stuff of life—cats, dishes, board games, the remnants of online school. Some people had made a little sacred space for the occasion: fl owers, a chalice, a paten, a cross. Somehow, each little window was a glimpse into the life we have been dealt this particular year and a beautiful nod to the brave attempts to do the best we could with the strange tools God saw fi t to give us for every time and circumstance. The ordinand and the commission must have empathized with those of us on Zoom, knowing that a captive audience on Zoom does not make a passive one. After being charged, the Rev. Alkema approached the camera and offered us each communion , by name, and we accepted and partook with the bread/graham crackers, etc. that we had prepared for the occasion of her ordination. I remember, most notably April saying, “Mom, this is the Body of Christ broken for you.” We were privileged in a way we would not have been in person to witness the ways in which our lives are intertwined with April’s life. We witnessed the impact of our lives on the journey of faith in a way that was as personal and profound as I have seen in any “in-person” ordination. This is an exhausting time for all human beings, and in particular ministry leaders . If you’re reading this issue of Journal for Preachers, you have a million reasons to be depleted and tired, not to mention the reasons that have nothing to do with pastoral ministry! Good job making it this far without quitting. Pastors clamor to respond to and simultaneously become exhausted by demands to return to worship in person. We recognize that many of our faithful pew dwellers—for all their time spent in church—have no idea what to do with themselves when the world is falling apart and reorienting—when the sanctuary doors are closed and locked. We Protestants, in particular, take pride, and joy, by experiencing rituals collectively as one church. At times we’ve avoided (denied?) baptisms and eucharist in more personal occasions (a birthday party, a hospital bed) despite our polity and human empathy allowing for such circumstances. Some in the church continue to feel shaky about allowing the eucharist via zoom and wary about backyard baptisms, preferring to host once again a party that occurs on our terms, in our buildings, in our sanctuaries. I remember once saying “no” to a baptism of someone who wasn’t comfortable being up front in church; new to the faith, she wanted to be baptized at home with her family and close friends. That person left the church and never got baptized. I wish I’d had the courage to offer that baptism in her home; there were myriad possibilities


    Page 42

    I couldn’t see at the time and millions of reasons to go ahead with it. Now, thanks to 2020, I’ve celebrated both the eucharist and baptism via Zoom, and thanks to the ingenuity and “for such a time as this-ness” of a handful of new worshipping community leaders, I’ve celebrated three ordinations—April’s, Riley’s, and Libby’s—as well. The rituals never felt out of place. And while there’s no place I’d rather be on Christmas Eve than a candlelit sanctuary, and no sound I’d rather hear than brass trumpets on Easter morning (some things just can’t happen on Zoom), I can’t wait to see the ways we invest our energy, intelligence, imagination, and love to practice our way into a more faithful church and world to come.

    Mark Ramsey Preaching and ritual, justice embodied in risk and trust, the need for connection and the new opportunities to reach beyond our well-chosen and comfortable boundaries, all of these are present in ministry right now—and yes, in revealing and accelerating forms. For all the expressed yearning of many to “get back to normal,” I think we are hearing increasing realization that “normal” will not be a “return.” But there are miles to go on this journey, I suspect. Adam Mixon testifi es to these trends.

    Adam Mixon, pastor of Zion Spring Baptist Church, Birmingham, Alabama (https:// www.zionsbconline.com) At our recent church council meeting, I asked this question: What’s going on? I framed our meeting around the questions about what has been lost, what assumptions we made at the onset of the pandemic, and what we see that is emerging. Initially we talked about the very real loss of life associated with Covid. There are several families that have been directly impacted by the disease. The grief over not being “present” with loved ones, not being able to make hospital visits, the strange way we’re having to do funerals. We talked about missing the time we spent together several times a week, whether in prayer, study, or worship. I sensed a longing to get back to that. (“I was glad when they said unto me, let us go to the house of the LORD”). But there was also the acknowledgement of the tremendous risks associated with gathering, especially in a community that looks like ours. The grief shifted organically into an amusingly different type of conversation about “what has been lost” to us thinking and refl ecting on “what is trying to emerge.” It was exciting and funny. Our congregation has surprised me by being so resilient. We are no strangers to struggles, but I am fl abbergasted at the faithfulness in study, prayer, and giving that has persisted. Our virtual gatherings and small groups are fl ourishing . Our weekly prayer services are well-attended, and our reach has extended well beyond our geography. It’s crazy! People (out of a sense of spiritual longing or disillusionment with the current social climate) are longing for connections, and fi nding them, in this virtual spiritual community! Spontaneously the conversation became a celebration of some of the “stuff we lost” but we are actually glad to be rid of. The burden of a whole lot of our religious experience has some performative aspects—it’s exhausting, unnecessary, and we are happy to be free of much of that. The weight of “going through the motions,” the sight-seeing, we are all enjoying being free of these things. This celebration of our liberation, however, is set against the backdrop of our initial assumptions that pandemic was a blip. This is not a blip; this is a shift—a radical reorientation— rooted


    Page 43

    in the forced assessment of our values exposed by this crisis. We have been forced to come to grips with where we were lacking, while embracing those things of real substance, the stuff that really matters. As to what emerges, we are on an adventure, a scary, exhilarating, wildly fulfi lling journey, and we have no idea where it’s going to lead us, but we are not going back. How we move forward will look very different than where we have been. Certainly some of our experiences and rituals will endure, but much of the ways we “do ministry” and imagine community are going to be different and broader: in-person and virtual… with decentralized “needs” and demands on clergy, with increased sensitivity toward what faithfulness to the gospel looks like in the public square (this is less of a stretch for us than it is a continuation). What was will be no more —good!

    Mark Ramsey Thousands of miles from Alabama, Sam Wells offers a brief refl ection on “Preaching and Worship BC and AC,” that seems to be in correspondence with these other reports.

    Sam Wells, vicar of St Martin-in-the-Fields, London, UK (https://www.stmartin-inthe -fi elds.org) What’s the difference between a Sunday worship service and a funeral? Everyone listens to the sermon at a funeral. A good funeral sermon, showing deep knowledge of the deceased, true understanding of the human condition, and a tender ability to demonstrate how the gospel embraces and transcends them both, is worth 20 regular sermons. Since March it’s been a funeral every Sunday morning. The three catastrophes of the pandemic—public health, economic meltdown, relentless social disruption—have concatenated to leave every congregation member sprawling. Add in Black Lives Matter, political turmoil, and ecological horrors, and it’s amounted to a lyric, personal nightmare and an epic, public trauma. Preaching has succeeded AC when it took this as an invitation to explore the deepest themes—fear, loss, pain, isolation, death—and interweave with them, through them, and fi nally beyond them the gospel of resurrection; yet in a minor key, already but not yet, irresistible but not tangible, yesterday and tomorrow but not always today. Worship has succeeded when it resisted the attempt to replicate online the familiar routines of BC liturgy, not just because online is a broader brushstroke than incarnate, but because right now incarnate worship is humbler, gentler, more tentative. The truth hasn’t changed, but we speak it as a loved one speaks truth to a dying family member while holding her hand at a hospital bedside. There’s no land in sight, but we keep sailing. Whether incarnate or online, the point is not to decide between YouTube and livestream, purchase a better microphone, or get the social distancing measures perfectly correct. The point is what it’s always been, only more so. See through life to Christ’s life. See through death to Christ’s death. See through Christ’s resurrection to our resurrection. And trust the Holy Spirit to do the rest.

    Mark Ramsey Time in the Wilderness offers painful lessons and re-orientation…and also oppor-


    Page 44

    tunities. With so many feeling loss, dislocation, and fear, even those who would never describe it so are looking for places of spiritual nurture and foundation. An opportunity for the church—if we can attend to it—is to re-introduce ourselves to our culture as a place of care, community, connection, depth, and equity. To offer, in Sam Wells’s words, to “see through life to Christ’s life…, see through death to Christ’s death…, see through Christ’s resurrection to our resurrection.” We can meet this moment with that deep spiritual sustenance, or we can continue our conversations of institutional maintenance. But the invitation of re-introduction becomes more prominent with each passing, painful, arduous day. Kristy Farber offers us a compelling image that is both summary of all these challenges, but also a profound hope and promise.

    Kristy Farber, senior pastor, Mercer Island, Washington, Presbyterian Church (www. mipc.org) At the end of a worship service last year in the sanctuary, during the fi nal hymn, I stood at the front of the congregation watching a child walk the light of Christ out of the sanctuary. Rather than stop in the narthex and set the candle lighter down, he kept going. Out the doors of the building. Down the sidewalk by the parking lot. He just kept walking. I was so captivated, watching him, that I almost forgot to give the benediction. It was beautiful. In that moment, I saw the mission of the church. I watched as a child took the light of Jesus, the one who offers love, forgiveness, peace, and took it as far as he could go, embracing the world in front of him. That image has grown stronger this year as we have not gathered together as a community in worship, yet our call to take the light of Jesus wherever we go has only deepened. While I am still preaching regularly and we are offering the nourishment of God’s word that way still, I have been watching how the pandemic has created much smaller ministries all over our area. I have been in awe of church staff and church members alike who are reading and proclaiming the Good News in unexpected places: in parking lots and at protests and in backyards and in our memorial garden and on zoom calls. The depth of our congregation to read and seek God’s word in this time has been profound, and it’s the place where I want to dive in and support and equip. I have been thinking about the ways people are taking the light of Christ and running with it. At one point last year, a parent asked me, “How young is too young to carry the Christ candle?” I love that question. Sure, they were likely thinking about the risk of fi re and small children. But there is a risk for anyone who takes the Christ candle into the world. The risk of encountering God in a new way. The risk of seeing the Kingdom of God in front of us. The risk of a world moving toward God’s peace and justice and wholeness. No one is too young. No one is too old. No one is too new. We are God’s people, called to bring God’s love and hope to the world.

    Mark Ramsey No attempt will be made in this piece to harmonize or summarize these important accounts from dedicated pastors and preachers who, like the readers of JP, are seeking to carry out their ministries with faithfulness and urgency. Part of their faithfulness is to not succumb to reducing or redirecting the complexity of the moment. Truly, ministry today is about proclamation and witness in vastly changed (and technologically challenging) circumstances. It is offering attention and witness to renewed calls for


    Page 45

    justice in a politically fraught and culturally divided landscape. It includes attending to the grief, the uncertainty, the longing, the dislocation, the de-centering that has been revealed and accelerated. And it is about lifting up Christ, crucifi ed and risen, in each new and often exhausting day—and offering that to our vulnerable world as generously as we can. Hope is a song in a weary throat. A fuller context of Pauli Murray’s verse gives larger perspective and content to the work ahead of us. Reading her words, I continue to think of the child carrying the light of Christ out of the church—and with that light, the song of hope, the song of faith, the song of kindliness, and the yearning for the just and beloved community keeps going, and going, and going.

    Hope is a crushed stalk Between clenched fingers. Hope is a bird’s wing Broken by a stone. Hope is a word in a tuneless ditty — A word whispered with the wind, A dream of forty acres and a mule, A cabin of one’s own and a moment to rest, A name and place for one’s children And children’s children at last . . . Hope is a song in a weary throat. Give me a song of hope And a world where I can sing it. Give me a song of faith And a people to believe in it. Give me a song of kindliness And a country where I can live it. Give me a song of hope and love And a brown girl’s heart to hear it.1

    Note 1 Pauli Murray, Dark Testament and Other Poems (New York: Liveright Publishing, 1970, 2018).