Author: Sara Palmer

  • Light! Energy! Illumination!: Introducing a New Method of Preaching

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 44

    Light! Energy! Illumination!

    Introducing a New Method of Preaching

    Julie Faith Parker The General Theological Seminary of the Episcopal Church, New York, New York

    A few years ago, I had an extensive three-day academic job interview for a position as a Hebrew Bible professor; among other presentations, I was to offer a class on preaching. The interview process prodded me to think deeply about how I approach writing sermons. Coming from a family of preachers (as the wife/daughter/sister of ministers and as an ordained minister myself), I have heard thousands of sermons over the years. I fi nd the best sermons are equally engaging, educational, relevant, and inspiring, so I developed a method that refl ects these priorities. Now as a seminary professor, I have taught this sermon form to my students, who have nicknamed it “the Parker Method.” This four-step approach is highly focused on the listeners in hopes of promoting active and engaged lives of faith. In this article, I outline the four steps of this method, then apply and analyze this approach using a sermon that I recently preached. My hope is that you may fi nd this sermon form as helpful as I do.

    Four Steps 1)My preaching method begins with a Hook. First, capture your hearers’ attention by giving them an immediate reason to stay tuned. Preaching is an anachronistic art. As preachers, we are like Victrolas in the age of Spotify. People in the 21st century are used to being entertained in ways that they were not centuries ago when preaching was entertainment. This expectation of gratifi cation and amusement creates a homiletical challenge. The Hook grabs the hearer’s ear. Possible hooks include a surprising statement, a captivating story, a short and funny joke, a personal (but appropriate ) confession, or naming an issue in the culture that is already on people’s minds. Unless your congregants are motivated to listen at the outset of your sermon when their attention is fresh, they may soon be thinking about what they would like to order for brunch. 2) Once you have engaged the listener with the Hook, delve into Exegesis. Most preachers have had the privilege of seminary or other focused, academic scriptural study, which their parishioners have not. Share your knowledge. People in our churches are hungry to learn about the Bible. Do your homework and teach them something new. Be sure that they leave worship understanding at least one thing about the Bible that they did not know prior to the sermon. Your talk from the pulpit (physical or virtual) may be a brilliant lecture or a scintillating speech, but it is only a sermon if rooted in the Bible. Increase Scriptural understanding. Your listeners will be grateful. 3) Having captured your hearers’ attention and then educated them about your biblical text, make this knowledge relevant. Your Application brings the Bible to your listener. What does this text have to do with me and you? What difference can it make in our day-to-day lives? What is happening in our lives and community, or the culture, society, and wider world, that connects to this text? Guide your hearers to discover the passage not only as a text from an ancient world but as a living Word.


    Page 45

    4)The fourth and fi nal segment of this method is the Takeaway. Push your hearers in their faith. Give the congregants one assignment. Articulate a way to live differently next week from last week, based on the sermon. Provide a specifi c suggestion that is doable. Inspire them—and show them how—to grow as people of faith. As you may have deduced from the bold type above, the “Parker Method” (Hook, Exegesis, Application, Takeaway) can be remembered with an acronym. Create H.E.A.T. Let your sermon shed light on God’s word, illumine your congregants’ understanding of the Bible, and energize them for the work of living their spiritual convictions. Spark warmth in your family of faith.

    Sample Sermon Illustration I would now like to demonstrate this form with a sermon I recently preached at The General Theological Seminary of the Episcopal Church in New York City, where I teach. This sermon was preached for the Proper 22 Thursday Eucharist service (the eighteenth week after Pentecost); my text was Luke 11:5-13 (NRSV) reprinted below. I will go through the sermon and point out the use of the method in its four segments.

    Suppose one of you has a friend, and you go to him at midnight and say to him, “Friend, lend me three loaves of bread; for a friend of mine has arrived , and I have nothing to set before him.” And he answers from within, “Do not bother me; the door has already been locked, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot get up and give you anything.” I tell you, even though he will not get up and give him anything because he is his friend, at least because of his persistence he will get up and give him whatever he needs. So I say to you, “Ask, and it will be given you; search, and you will fi nd; knock, and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and everyone who searches fi nds, and for everyone who knocks, the door will be opened. Is there anyone among you who, if your child asks for a fi sh, will give a snake instead of a fi sh? Or if the child asks for an egg, will give a scorpion? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!”

    Sermon Title: “Cosmic Vending Machine” 1) Hook: I have a friend in the Mafi a. You heard me right. And there is no catch. I do not mean “friend” like a character from a tv show or movie with whom I feel a special kinship. I am not referring to the “Mafi a” as some acronym you have never heard of like, “My My M Association of Friends Fr F in Absentia.” No. I mean a man from Queens whose family was the model for the movie Goodfellas. Let me explain. Last year I got an email out of the blue from a man trying to contact any professor in religious studies. He was calling seminaries randomly, and someone gave him my email. Now probably most people who got an email from a stranger would have Googled him. They would have seen the instant Mafi a connection (which, I later


    Page 46

    discovered, pops up right away), then decided to stay away from him. Curiously, I did not look him up online. Instead, I emailed back to this stranger, trying to be generous of spirit. This man then told me that he had a video that he had taken while fi shing, of Jesus walking on the water, and would I like to see it? His priest told him he needed some religious authority to verify it. He did not want to send his precious video over the internet. I suggested that we meet for coffee at Le Grainne Café, nearby on the corner of 9th Avenue and 21st Street. t When I told my husband, Bill, about my plans to have coffee with this unknown man (whom I still had not Googled), Bill thought it would be a smart idea to join us. So one sunny morning, Bill and I met this fi sherman, Peter. Over coffee and café au lait, Peter showed us his video. He mentioned living in Howard Beach and working in construction. He spoke about “the company” and referred to large sums of money. He looked like he could be in the Mafi a—right out of central casting. At one point, Bill asked him point blank, “Is your family connected to the Mob?” Peter did not skip a beat. “Oh yes,” he said (rather blithely, it seemed to me), “the movie Goodfellas was based on my family. Martin Scorsese is now a family friend. They’re not bad people, it’s just the family business.” I decided to write a letter for Peter explaining the various ways God speaks through visions in the Bible, supporting his spiritual encounter. He was grateful for my help and said that he wanted to do something for me. Right away I asked Peter for prayer. More specifi cally, I asked if he would pray that my son Graham would get a job. This was just before the pandemic began, and my son was severely underemployed. Peter prayed for Graham. I prayed for Graham. This seminary community prayed for Graham because I frequently said his name during the prayers of intercession. Graham has come to this worship service other times when I have preached, but he is not here now, and do you know why? He is at work. Even in this pandemic, my son got a job. It feels like a miracle. Hook Commentary: In my seminary community, few people have Mafi a associations (that I am aware of, anyway). This opening statement gets their attention. The Hook above is a little long, but there is some humor and a happy ending woven in. It also provides a concrete connection with the congregation because students and faculty on campus know Graham and have prayed for him. I had asked both Peter and Graham’s permission to share this story.

    2) Exegesis: I tell you this story because it offers one clear and recent example in my life of the power of prayer. Luke 11, where our passage comes from today, starts with the Lord’s Prayer before picking up with the parable about prayer. This parable describing a persistent nighttime seeker only appears in Luke and refl ects this Gospel writer’s commitment to prayer. Jesus prays far more in Luke than he does in any of the other Gospels. So what is Luke trying to teach us about prayer in these verses? Verses fi ve to eight do not pose tough interpretational challenges. Someone comes to a friend’s house because a visitor has arrived and he has nothing to offer him to eat. Within the honor-shame culture of Jesus’ world, the consequences from not showing hospitality were a real threat to one’s own well-being. But the house is locked, the children are asleep, and the person inside cannot be bothered. Yet the one who is outside does not


    Page 47

    give up and eventually gets what he came for. Positioned before and after verses on prayer, the message is clear: keep praying for what you need. Persist. It is the next part of the passage that really challenges me. “9 So I say to you, Ask, and it will be given to you; search, and you will fi nd; knock, and the door will be opened for you. 10 For everyone who asks receives, and everyone who searches fi nds, and for everyone who knocks, the door will be opened.” Really? We get everything we ask for through persistent prayer? And then Jesus adds an odd analogy about children asking for fi sh, and would the parent give them a snake or asking for an egg, and would the parent give them a scorpion. I looked at the Greek here to see if there were any translation issues to help clarify this strange passage but sadly came up empty. However, I did learn the Greek word for “scorpion”: σκορπίον (“scorpion”). And then, if our understanding is not muddled enough, Jesus calls his disciples, those to whom he just taught the Lord’s prayer, evil! What is going on here? Exegesis commentary: This section offers a few pieces of biblical information that most people did not know at the outset of the sermon: 1) this passage comes right after The Lord’s Prayer so is in a wider prayerful context; 2) Jesus prays more in Luke than the other Gospels; 3) Jesus comes from an honor-shame culture where stakes for hospitality are high; 4) scorpion is a Greek/English cognate. This section also sets up the application to our lives: how come so many prayers feel unanswered?

    3) Application: Why does Jesus assert “ask and it will be given” in the context of speaking about prayer? All we need to do is pray? It seems like Jesus sets up God as a cosmic vending machine. I have two friends, one man and one woman, who would love to be married but are not. For decades, they have been praying to God for a partner, but both are still single. So what happened? We all could come up with lots of examples of unanswered prayer, some very dire. George Floyd needed to breathe. People with Covid need health. Billions of people around the world need enough food, clean water, breathable air. To say that they did not pray enough or ask God in the right way is an awful example of blaming the victim. Jesus does not insist that we pray all day every day to get what we need. He just says ask, search, knock, and it will be given, found, and opened. But is it? I do not think that Jesus viewed God as a cosmic vending machine. Jesus certainly asked for things that he did not get, even in Luke’s Gospel. Jesus knows spiritual disappointment (for example, Luke 22:45). Knowing the pain that awaits on the journey to the cross, Jesus asks God that he might be spared (Luke 22:42). Jesus does not always get what he wanted from God—then why does he tell us to expect that we will? For me, the key to make sense of this passage comes in the very last verse: “13If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” You and I do not think of ourselves as evil, but how can we escape it? We would rather point to the Mafi a as an obvious example of evil–but how exempt are we? We live in and contribute to a racist, sexist, classist, society through our actions and our silent complicity. What we buy and the way we live perpetuate oppression. I can


    Page 48

    easily see why sometimes Jesus might call those listening, and therefore us, evil. Application Commentary: The application above joins the hearer to the text through cognitive dissonance. Jesus’ words suggest one thing (pray and your prayers will be answered), but we know otherwise. Examples of unanswered prayer abound). This section also names evils in society and our own role in perpetuating these evils. The application section will vary signifi cantly according to the community receiving the sermon. The above statements about participating in a racist, classist, sexist society are apt for those receiving this sermon (myself included).

    4) Takeaway: Jesus’ response to evil in this passage is two-fold. First, be persistent in prayer no matter what the circumstances of your life or how inconvenient prayer may be. Commit to praying with your whole heart, and persist. Right now, renew your commitment to more constant prayer. Do not expect all your prayers to be instantly answered as you want them to be—but be aware of how God may be working in your life. Second, recognize what Jesus promises in this text. He does not say you will receive exactly what you want. He does not say you will fi nd your heart’s perfect desires. He does not say knock and all your problems will disappear or the door will be opened for all your dreams to come true. Instead, Jesus promises the Holy Spirit. When we pray, the Holy Spirit comes to us. This Spirit rescues us from wallowing in bitterness, disappointment, sorrow, or self-pity. The Holy Spirit guides us, keeps us, and comforts us. The Spirit is what we receive when we ask and open our hearts. And that is its own miracle. God knows, Jesus knows, and we do too—life is messy and hard. You show me someone with a perfect life, and I will show you someone whom you do not know very well. No one gets everything they want; we are still on this side of heaven. And our job while we are here is to go through life with grace and generosity of Spirit so there is room for the Holy Spirit to move in us and through us. So pray fervently. Believe that the Holy Spirit is working through you and your prayers. Be gracious of spirit, toward others and yourself. Be generous in your praying. We will not get everything we ask for, but the opening of possibilities and avenues of hope and strength will come through persistent prayer. Every day–as believers in the Gospel of radical love–let us be inspired and sustained by prayer so that the Holy Spirit may fl ow through us. In Christ’s name, may it be so. Amen.

    Takeaway Commentary: The Takeaway here has a few components, highlighting trust, grace, and prayer. A concrete task is put before the listener: pray more. The hearers are invited to recommit and revitalize their prayer lives, trusting that the Holy Spirit will work through their prayers. This concrete task strengthens the listener’s life as a person of faith.

    Conclusion Preaching combines scriptural study and practiced skill in an act of courage, vulnerability , passion, and faith. Crafting a sermon can be overwhelming, which is why I


    Page 49

    fi nd breaking the process into four simple steps so helpful. The hearers easily connect to the sermon because it reaches out to them with the opening hook and exegetical sharing of biblical knowledge. The message then invites them to walk further in their journey of faith, with the application of the text to their own lives and the takeaway that gives them homiletical homework going forward. And so, thoughtful preacher, I close my refl ection on a sermon about prayer with a prayer for you: God of Grace and God of Glory, On this preacher, pour your power. Amen.

  • Resurrection in Pandemic

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 24

    Resurrection in Pandemic

    P. Richard Game

    St. Patrick’s Episcopal Church, Dunwoody, Georgia

    The 1993 fi lm Groundhog Day featured Bill Murray as a cynical weather reporter who rose each morning to the dreadful realization that the calendar had not moved. We too have been hoping in vain to awake from our global COVID-19 (“Covid”) nightmare. What a long Holy Saturday of waiting! As I write, we have entered Advent , and the world is bracing for another terrifying spike in the virus just in time for Christmas, and while the new vaccines hold great promise, we fear that Covid will plague us well into 2021. It may be Groundhog Day for a while. We must not underestimate the pain of this pandemic. This season of “Covidtide” is on its own timetable, for the virus has no regard for politics or power and cares nothing about our secular and liturgical calendars. Schedules for schools, vacations, graduations, sporting events, birthdays, anniversaries, holidays, and even presidential elections all yield to it. Last spring many predicted that we would return to full-on, in-person worship by Easter 2020, amid alleluias, fl owered crosses, and egg hunts. Yet, the pews of most sanctuaries were empty on Easter, closed for fear of catching or spreading the virus, closed for the common good. The Great Fifty Days of Easter passed and then Pentecost, until we reached the long summer slog of ordinary time, and with it, the realization that lockdowns would be with us for the long haul. While the pandemic dominates temporal Chronos, God alone governs eternal Kairos. God is at work, redeeming what seems lost in this in-between season of “Covidtide.” The Covid disruption has inspired incredible innovations in worship, formation, and service, particularly through online platforms. What follows is a witness to new life emerging from pandemic chaos, mostly among partners in faith in the Episcopal parish I serve.

    The Church Never Closed Our bishop drew a mostly welcomed line in the liturgical sand in March of 2020 when he announced that we would not be worshipping inside our buildings until science informs that we may do so safely. Covid literally threw us out of the boat—our Nave.1 We have remained physically distanced since then. A mentor once told me, “God doesn’t waste much,” and so it seems with the Church in pandemic. Signs that God is not wasting this opportunity to transform the Church are as viral as the disease itself. First, the Church never closed. The Church cannot close, for she is not a building . Rather, we, the Church, have simply left the building for a time. This is nothing new. That fi rst Easter, Jesus was on the move, appearing to the women, and then to the other eleven disciples, and then to more than 500 (1 Corinthians 15:1-6). Jesus’ last word to the disciples in Matthew was a command that they go (Matt 28:16-20). We who would follow Jesus are and have always been a “sent” people. Some worshipping communities have long emphasized the contemporary mandate of the Great Commission with signs above doors reminding those exiting that “Now your service begins.” Like it or not, worshipping communities in Covidtide must examine afresh


    Page 25

    what it means to begin their service—to be the Church outside the building.

    Online Is Real, Not Virtual The destructions of the First and Second Temples and the resulting diasporas empowered the Hebrews to reimagine faithfulness to Yahweh outside of Jerusalem and the sacrifi cial system. Likewise, Covid has forced an otherwise reluctant Church to reimagine what it means to be the Body of Christ that cannot gather in its accustomed mode. Like Paul who wrote letters from prison to his fl edgling communities, we too have needed to fi nd ways to remain connected when absent from each other. We do miss being with each other. More than that, we long for the physical embodiments of our spiritual connection as members of the Body of Christ, the handshake or hug at the passing of the peace, the common meal around the altar, and the adoration, singing, praying, confessing, and praising together in the assembly. We share something of Mary Magdalene’s loss when Jesus forbade her touch during their garden encounter that fi rst Easter morning (John 20:11-17). Our online Centering Prayer class noticed with regret the following among Thomas Keating’s guidelines for Christian life, growth, and transformation: “The presence of Christ is ministered to each other and becomes tangible in the community, especially when it is gathered for worship or engaged in some work of service to those in need.”2How then may we recognize the abiding presence of Christ in Covidtide? Our Centering Prayer group and others have grown to appreciate the value of “seeing ” and “hearing” each other by online means, before and after praying together in silence. The Spirit is binding us together as the Body of Christ despite the physical distance between us. We have been heartened, too, by how nimbly our parish has taken up communal opportunities for spiritual growth through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and other online platforms. Mature practitioners, members who have moved, and many seekers have come to our online classes on social justice issues such as systemic racism and white privilege. Online studies of Lewis’s Great Divorce, the daunting Book of Revelation , and other books have formed faithful followings. Expert presenters and gifted preachers from coast to coast have enriched our gatherings with relative ease and, importantly, without the added expense of travel and lodging. Meanwhile, with but modest encouragement and support, the laity have led online evening prayer offerings for every day of the week, and other groups have created weekly online gatherings on their own. Our aging population has been particularly faithful to these electronic meetings, many reporting that they are lifelines to connection against the forced isolation of Covid. To be clear, not all have accessed online offerings. Perhaps because they have been online in school so often, youth have reported “zoom fatigue.” So the parish has experimented intentionally with masked and distanced outside gatherings such as a costumed “Oktober-ween” celebration, a planned drive-in movie, and socially distanced bonfi res. Youth now organize, videotape, and edit Sunday worship every six weeks, sharing with the congregation their lively faith through contemporary music that has drawn them together on retreats. Nonetheless, there is still much work ahead to engage and incorporate youth in our common life.


    Page 26

    Online Worship: Clergy As Televangelists As the poet James Russell Lowell penned, “New occasions teach new duties; Time makes ancient good uncouth.”3 Mainline denominations have been content to let the “Evangelicals” lead the pack when it comes to broadcasting worship, but making worship accessible during Covidtide requires us all to enter the online on-ramp, lest we slip away into irrelevance. Although some clergy have lamented becoming “televangelists,” many have allowed curiosity (or at least desperation) to suppress that aversion. Some clergy have reported “Covid fatigue,” fi nding themselves neither equipped for nor called to new tasks such as recording and editing video and managing zoom technology, particularly under the heightened pastoral load of Covidtide. Many are triggered by the all too common “addiction to competence.” This is vital work for God, after all! But true discernment includes determining both whether the task is necessary and whether it is the clergy’s to do. Empowering the baptized in their ministries is among the most important responsibilities of clergy in every season. The Body of Christ has many parts, and each is necessary to its vitality (1 Cor. 12:12-30). A few things are up to the clergy, but not everything. Our parish learned by doing on those fi rst Sundays of Covidtide. We decided early on that if we could no longer gather in the Nave, we would worship in solidarity together outside of the building. Worship leaders (clergy and lay alike) videotaped their respective parts from where they were located (with a few exceptions, such as a baptism in the courtyard and some sermons in the Chapel). In our preparation to return to in-person worship, we have purchased specialized cameras for videotaping some portions of the service in the Nave even before we may gather there as a body. But, importantly, the Church has been gathering in our homes during Covidtide, revealing them to be the sacred spaces they always could have been for us, but for our failure to appreciate the possibility. Our parish’s understandable resistance to unfamiliar technology and the change in the pattern of worship gave way to acceptance of new, safer ways of gathering. Early online converts even included a parishioner who before had insisted on a printed newsletter. Worship leaders took ownership of producing our Sunday offerings. Unlike pre-Covid, rarely has anyone failed to show up (by video) when needed. Lectors and intercessors became quick studies in the technology, recording themselves using handheld or desk top devices. Others submitted voice recordings for our virtual choir. After a few live mishaps (internet freezing, etc.), we switched to pre-recorded Sunday services, streaming them at the normal time for our main service. And we encouraged parish fellowship by framing the recorded service between an online “Narthex” (time for prayers, birthday and anniversary blessings, and announcements) and an online “Coffee Hour” following the postlude. We closed each online Narthex with the bidding “See you in the service, and back here afterwards for coffee.” We settled into worship in our homes, connecting with each other through the platform’s chat feature with comments on sermon content or musical offerings or to praise a youth who had sung or played an instrument, or to offer real-time prayer requests and praise reports. Each service recording remained available for later viewing , and many more checked in to watch during the week. We also discovered the versatility of our Director of Music, who taught himself how to edit video, enhancing our recorded liturgy with images and video clips ap-


    Page 27

    propriate for the theme of our services. For example, our Independence Day Service included fl yover clips of the heartland, the Statue of Liberty, and the Capitol, with Copland’s Fanfare for the Common Man and Hoedown as accompaniment. Images from the protests in Atlanta and elsewhere appeared on our screens after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Including engaging, reinforcing images in our Sunday liturgy and message had never occurred to us prior to Covidtide. It is now diffi cult to imagine worship without them.

    Holy Altars, Holy Homes Our Book of Common Prayer teaches that the Holy Eucharist is “the principal act r of Christian worship on the Lord’s Day.” 4 By keeping us from gathering in person, Covid disrupted the core of our life together as a worshipping community. Many clergy spoke passionately of the virtue of a “fast from communion” during Covidtide and advocated Morning Prayer and other non-Eucharistic liturgies as substitutes. Believing the rhythm of the Eucharistic prayers would provide helpful consistency and steady comfort during strange times, we and other parishes collaborated on ways to adapt the celebration to fi t the limitations of the online platform. Anglican Eucharistic theology is generous enough to allow a wide array of opinions on whether and how communicants may be fed spiritually without consuming the blessed bread and wine. With little theological elaboration, we simply invited people to be curious about and open to the work of the Spirit around the holy tables in their homes. At least one parishioner (and I am certain others) took this message to heart, reporting that they brought their own bread and wine to their table on Sunday mornings. My wife Anne and occasionally one of my daughters presented the blessed elements from the altar of our breakfast room table. In solidarity with the online congregation, we did not consume them. Drawing on Augustine’s teachings about the Eucharist, we then bid people to “behold what you are, become what you receive, spiritually, the Body of Christ, broken and given to the world.”4 It cannot be said that online Sunday services have been as transformative as our pre-Covid liturgies. Two millennia of Jesus showing up when two or three are gathered or when people meet him together at table with burning hearts suggest otherwise (Matt 18:20; Luke 24:13-35). We also miss something of Keating’s “presence of Christ…tangible”5 when we are not able to sing to God or adore him together in the assembly, but the Spirit has moved among us nonetheless through these new forms. Online platforms have proven their worth in reaching members and seekers for whom distance, schedule, or incapacity keep them from participating in person. Online worship as an augment to in-person worship is here to stay. The punch line of our learning about online worship is that since this shift, we estimate that our Sunday service participation during the week has increased two and sometimes threefold over pre-Covid Sunday in-person attendance alone. And so we are already planning to record and stream our in-person services from the Nave when we return.

    Keeping What Is Essential, Blessing And Releasing The Rest Parents with school-aged children at home and perhaps others may object to the suggestion that the pace of their lives has slowed, and rightly so. Moreover, cabin fever


    Page 28

    is pervasive. Yet for many, Covid has created a new spaciousness. For one thing, the commute time has been eliminated for the many who now work from home. Covid has restricted other travel, both locally and to distant locations. Beyond its impact on parish life, participation in communal activities from soccer games to concerts to movies has all but ceased. This deceleration has opened opportunities for us to experience and appreciate simpler blessings as gifts from God, like a walk in the neighborhood or a carefully prepared meal at table at home (as opposed to fast food in the car stuffed down between events). Perhaps this time of sheltering in place has inspired us to pause and reevaluate our pre-Covid, frenetic activity. Perhaps it has opened space for God. Deep within the received wisdom of parish life lies the sacred mantra that if you feed them, they will come. Yet, our parish has not hosted a single gathering around food since our Shrove Tuesday Pancake Supper on the eve of Ash Wednesday 2020. In fact, we have held but a few limited capacity, outside, in-person gatherings during Covidtide. Still, we have survived as a worshipping community and even thrived. Had we been spinning needlessly faster and faster on the hamster wheel of activity? Might we reapply our energies toward efforts that give life and yield growth, like our online and in person reach into the community? One wonders which activities we will resume and which we will bless and release when the pandemic ends.

    Too Much Room In The Inn Covid also may cause the Church to face her attachment to physical space. The elephant in the room is that worshipping communities spend considerable portions of their budgets paying for, maintaining, cleaning, heating and cooling buildings that are occupied for very few hours of the week—and now almost not at all. Our experience with online gathering disrupts assumptions around the virtue of this old model, assuming it was sustainable to begin with. Are we trying to pour new wine into old wine skins? Like corporate America, the post-pandemic Church will have occasion to reassess whether the energy and resources spent on buildings supports or strangles the proclamation of the gospel. Experiments in sacred space sharing, centralized worship on feast days and other occasions, and other innovations likely will emerge out of our experience of lockdown. Meanwhile, there have been at least two lights in the otherwise darkened hallways of our parish, for two essential ministries operated despite Covid, and both suggest a way forward after Covidtide. With pandemic-inspired help from our Mayor, in-kind donations from gleaners and unexpected monetary donations from others, our feeding ministry, Malachi’s Storehouse, has doubled the number of families receiving groceries each week. The community clearly has taken on Malachi’s as a vital cord in the safety net of support for those in need, as many outside the parish have opened their checkbooks for us. The Rotary Club, the City of Dunwoody, DeKalb County, and others have awarded signifi cant infrastructure and food grants for Malachi’s operations . In short, and thanks in part to Covid, and many hours of dedicated service and inspired leadership by our team, it appears that Malachi’s may receive suffi cient outside resources necessary to sustain this larger offering to the community—resources beyond the capacity of the parish to provide. Second, at the very beginning of Covidtide, we decided to partner with a group called Clubhouse Atlanta, which provides a structured workday for people whose


    Page 29

    lives are disrupted by mental illness. Clubhouse Atlanta offi cially opened its doors in October and now offers this vital care to its members in our otherwise empty parish hall, with plans to begin contributing to the maintenance and upkeep of our space beginning in 2021.

    Kairos Over Chronos Covid has torn up our calendars, but could it be that this disruption, dramatic as it has been in our lives, is applying the exact kind of pressure necessary to encourage the change needed for the message of the gospel to thrive? Could it be that the confl uence of the pandemic and the rise of the online age are part of the Paschal mystery, God’s plan from eternity for drawing together all of creation to God through Jesus Christ? After all, Covid may have control of Chronos for the moment, but it has no power over Kairos. It may feel like Groundhog Day all over again, yet like Bill Murray’s character in the fi lm, we are growing, changing, and transforming each day, even in Covidtide. Adapting to and adopting online platforms for proclamation seem part and parcel of the Church’s work for a future after Covidtide. God is doing a new thing among us (Is. 43:19). If the Church fails to perceive it, she does so at her peril. The Paschal mystery teaches this uncomfortable truth: the pain of Good Friday and the waiting of Holy Saturday are not to be avoided, but are to be lived through. The two days of disorientation are necessary for resurrection on the third. And resurrection life never looks the same as life before. Mary Magdalene mistook our risen lord for the gardener (John 20:11-17)! The post-pandemic, resurrected Church will look different as well.

    Notes 1 Nave is a term Episcopalians use to describe a worship space, deriving from the same Latin root as the word navy. The Nave symbolizes that the Church is the ship of salvation. 2 Thomas Keating, Open Mind, Open Heart: The Contemplative Dimension of The Gospel (New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006), 161. 3 James Russel Lowell, “The Present Crisis,” available online at http:/poets.org/poem/present-crisis (public domain). 4 The Book of Common Prayer (Seabury Press: New York, 1979), 13. r r 5 I fi rst heard a version of this invitation by The Rev. Sarah Fisher, who served at our altar some years ago. It seems to originate from a Eucharistic liturgy used by the Society of St. John the Evangelist in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in paraphrase of St. Augustine’s Sermon 57, “On The Holy Eucharist,” Augustine , Sermons, (51-94) on the Old Testament, trans. E. Hill (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1991). 6 Keating, Open Mind, Open Heart, 161.

  • Preaching the Lenten Texts 2021: Hope for the Covenant Community

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 3

    Preaching the Lenten Texts 2021:

    Hope for the Covenant Community

    James S. Lowry, Hendersonville, North Carolina, and Patrick W. T. Johnson, First Presbyterian Church, Asheville, North Carolina

    Introduction We began our conversation about this article in the summer of 2020. We did so realizing fully that the church and world at the time of this writing are apt to look quite different in the Spring of 2021. As we write, the world is in the midst of a global pandemic that grows more ominous with each passing news cycle; the unemployment rate is at record highs; the body politic is locked in a bitter election cycle; wildfi res are out of control on much of the West coast; the Black Lives Matter movement is gathering momentum amid bitter protests that, while mostly peaceful, sometimes erupts into violence; international allegiances are shifting; and much of the world is either food insecure or starving, even as wars and rumors of wars rage; and the church as we know it is unable to gather and is mostly worshiping remotely. How much any or all of this has changed by the time Lent rolls around is not clear. Of this, however, we are certain: for Lent 2021 it will be even more incumbent than usual for the community of faith, drawn together in covenant with the eternal Christ, to call itself collectively, its members individually, and its world to be self-refl ective at new depths as we move into the promise and hope of Easter. We note that of the fi ve Old Testament lessons suggested for the season, four of them deal explicitly with some aspect of living in covenant with God, and the fi fth (Nb 21:4-9) deals with God’s covenant people living and discovering hope in the midst of crisis. We are, therefore, suggesting that pastors who will be preaching and leading worship in Lent 2021 consider using the concept/s of covenant as a unifying theme throughout the season. Moreover, we are suggesting that preaching and worship during the season consciously and deliberately move toward the promise of a new covenant written on the hearts of believers as promised in the Jeremiah text (31:31-34). Finally, we suggest that the rich variety of recommended readings from the psalms, the epistles, and the gospels be used to inform, broaden, and enlighten what it means for the people of God to live in and into a covenant relationship to the eternal Christ as we move into a prophetic and pastoral mission in a deeply troubled world.

    Lent 1 Historically, Lent was a time of catechesis for the church, especially for disciples who would be baptized on Easter. The gospel lesson for the fi rst Sunday of Lent each year tells the story of Jesus being driven into the wilderness. Mark’s wilderness story, though, is painfully short compared to other gospels. The telling is so succinct; the reading includes both Jesus’ baptism and his temptation in the wilderness. Having both these events in view at once is a gift that may prompt us to refl ect on the meaning of our baptism in light of our wilderness experiences in faith and life. The journey of faith that begins in baptism, and a baptismal vocation faithfully pursued, will take us through the wilderness. Like Jesus we will experience testing and, mercifully, God’s


    Page 4

    providential care. The Psalm for the day pairs with the gospel reading, and if it is not read on its own, it would serve well as the basis for a prayer of confession. The Old Testament readings in this season also offer an excellent catechetical opportunity because they give us the opportunity to place the death and resurrection of Christ in the broad frame of covenantal theology. It’s for that reason we suggest following the Hebrew scripture lessons each week as a thematic series for this season. This week we read the Noahic covenant, though the story of the ark and fl ood is all in the background, and the text includes only the promise God makes when the waters have receded and the earth is ready for a fresh start. Four times in this brief passage we hear the parties to the covenant named. They are God, humanity, and the earth. Very importantly, this covenant is between God, Noah and all Noah’s descendants, and every living creature, an inclusion that is unique in Hebrew covenants. In a time when the effects of climate change are becoming more apparent, when the daily impact on the earth and human society is becoming more signifi cant, and when scientists are increasingly pessimistic about our ability to slow the rise in the earth’s temperature, the preacher may well linger here. What does it mean for the earth to be a recipient of God’s covenant promise and grace? Moreover, what does it mean for humankind to be joined in solidarity before God with every other living creature? The sign of this covenant, the reminder of God’s promise, is painted on nearly every church nursery wall: a rainbow. The rainbow inspires wonder and delight when it hangs in the sky, but its meaning here is more likely rooted in the warfare of a bow and arrow. God has hung up God’s bow. God has put the weapons away, and God seems almost sorry for the fl ood. Never again will God attempt to redeem creation by destroying it. If the preacher lingers here, this covenant could be a call to imaginative peacemaking. If we forsake violence as the means to worthy ends, what bows do we need to hang up? By turning from violence in this covenant, God signals that God will work toward redemption in other ways, other covenants. Ultimately, the Christian story is that God will redeem through God’s own self-giving love. Through willing submission to human evil, God will drown evil in fl ood of divine love that holds the promise of redemption for the whole creation. The epistle lesson for the day points us in this direction, connecting the waters of Noah’s fl ood to the waters of baptism and the consummation of Christ’s reign of righteousness and peace. As Martin Luther taught in the Flood Prayer that informs many baptismal liturgies, the waters of the Great Flood, the waters of the Jordan, and the waters of our own baptism are all part of God’s long story of redemption.

    Lent 2 There is an embarrassment of riches for Lent 2, as well as an unusually large number of problems in terms of the listings being lifted out of their context. The selections from Genesis 17, for example, not only start and stop in awkward places, but they are a very long way from Genesis 11:30, which gives Genesis 17 its dramatic impact. Moreover, the verses listed from Psalm 22, while powerful in their own right, lose their real punch when separated from the opening lines of the psalm, which Jesus famously quoted from the cross. Finally in this regard, the verses suggested from Mark 8 identify clearly Peter’s inability to grasp the necessity (inevitability) of crucifi xion, but they do not let that misunderstanding stand in stark contrast to his


    Page 5

    famous affi rmation that Jesus is “the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Peter’s bold declaration appears but a few short verses before the verses listed for this week. In addition to sorting through these problems of context, preachers will also have to decide if Paul’s strong affi rmation of faith, like that of Abraham in the Romans text, is so weighted by being seen in contrast to law that unpacking it might be better suited for a study group than for preaching. That would be unfortunate, but it may be true. The greater truth of the Romans text certainly informs strongly what it means to be a covenant community at worship during Lent 2021. In keeping with our suggestion of focusing on God’s covenantal relationship with humankind, we are encouraging a careful revisiting of the familiar name-changing covenant God established with Abraham and Sarah. Moreover, since 2021 will no doubt be a year in which worshipers will be experiencing hopelessness on many fronts, we suggest nudging worshipers in the direction of Genesis 10 and 11 as prelude to the Genesis 17 texts. With the exception of the Tower of Babel narrative in 11:1-9, those two chapters are nothing more (nor less!) than a listing of the generations from Noah to Abram and Sarai. Reading all of those hard to pronounce names of old men in morning worship is not advised, but reading enough of them to set the tone could be quite effective when one concludes by reading 11:30, where it abruptly declares that Sarai, in contrast to all the unnamed wives of those old men, was barren. In other words, in the parlance of Genesis, there was no future for the people of God. Before Abram and Sarai, the history of God’s people moved along, if not always swimmingly, at least consistently. Then suddenly, there was no visible way forward. It was exactly against that backdrop that God established the covenant with Abram and Sarai wherein God promised to be their God, and against all odds, God called them to faithfulness as they stepped out into the promise of God to make of them a people of hope for all people. As heirs to that covenant in 2021 look out the windows of the church and see picture after picture and landscape after landscape of hopelessness, it could be quite helpful to lead people of faith in seeing themselves (ourselves) as party to that covenant in which, against all odds, we are called to faithfulness as we move in hope toward the promises of the God who is ever faithful. Importantly and not at all coincidentally, the necessity of sacrifi ce on the part of Jesus set out in the Mark 8 text is crucially important for us to see as the people of God move into what seems to be a hopelessly barren world. Moreover, on the journey the encouragement of Paul to us as descendants of Abraham and Sarah to use the faith given to us by our faithful God to “hope against hope” is what will keep us from dissolving into despair in these interim troubled times. And at last, the covenant people can realistically hope/believe that the anguished cry from Psalm 22 quoted by Jesus from the cross will conclude with the affi rmation that “Posterity will serve (God); future generations will be told about the Lord, and proclaim his deliverance to a people yet unborn…” (Ps. 22:30-31).

    Lent 3 Before turning to the texts for Lent 3, we would invite you to look out on the wider culture. What stories tell us about the god or gods we worship? There is a strong narrative called capitalistic wealth creation and another narrative about the competition among nations. For the last year, we’ve been living a narrative called “surviving COVID19.” Now look more closely at the stories in your congregation, the personal


    Page 6

    stories. For some, there’s the story of climbing up the ladder and for others, the story of working for the weekend. For many in our older congregations, the primary story is about enjoying a well-earned retirement, or most recently, surviving until it’s safe to go out again. This idea that the stories we live tell us about who our god is rattles around in the background of each of the texts for this week in Lent. Let’s begin with the reading from Exodus, which continues the theme we suggest of reading the Hebrew covenants. In terms of the arc of the Hebrew covenants, the most important verses in this reading are 1-2: “Then God spoke all these words: ‘The Lord your God, the One who has brought you out of the land of Egypt and the house of slavery.’” In a deep way, this is God’s story and thus God’s revealed identity even more than the enigmatic name given to Moses at the burning bush. If you read the Hebrew scriptures and ask “Who is God?” the answer is whoever brought Israel out of Egypt. That narrative of divine liberation is the fundamental context for these “ten words,” which is a better translation than ten commandments. Why are these words given? Contrary to common assumptions, they were not meant to remind would-be criminals what not to do, and they were not supposed to put the fear of God in a teenager thinking about smashing his neighbor’s mailbox. The preacher might start there because the congregation might well be there, but these ten words are about a life of freedom, not duty. God spoke these words to give shape to a life lived in gratitude to the One who delivers, who brought Israel out of Egypt. At fi rst glance, it seems diffi cult to connect the Old Testament lesson to the New Testament readings for the day. Indeed, the preacher should feel no pressure to do so. In general, it’s a better practice to choose one of the lectionary texts for a preaching focus. Still, when we see the texts together, some new insights emerge. In the gospel reading, we read about Jesus’ zeal for his Father’s house, clearing the Temple of moneychangers. When Jesus was challenged about the authority by which he could do this, he responded, “Destroy this Temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (Jn 2:19). For the hard of hearing, John adds, “He was speaking of the temple of his body” (Jn 2:21). This is another narrative answer to the question who is God. Read the Old Testament and ask, “Who is God?” and the answer is whoever brought Israel out of Egypt. If you read the New Testament and ask that question, the answer is whoever raised Jesus from the dead. Jesus is making a claim about his divinity and his relationship to the Father, and John is putting it right up front in this gospel instead of at the end, where the synoptics put it. In other words, the one who is about to speak and do all these things, including be crucifi ed, is the Lord your God who brought Israel out of Egypt. Depending on which story tells the story of our god or gods, that claim might be a stumbling block or seem like utter foolishness (1 Co 1:19). The Psalmist would have us believe that meditating on this story, letting it seep into our souls as the story of our God, is one of the most wondrous things a human person can do. The Torah of God (which in Hebrew is not only the law, but the whole Pentateuch) revives the soul, makes wise the simple, rejoices the heart, and enlightens the eyes (Ps 19:7-8).

    The Lectionary dishes up some interesting challenges for Lent 4. First and most obvious, the gospel lesson includes John 3:16, the verse that is surely the most quoted


    Page 7

    in all of the Christian cannon of sacred texts. Bringing fresh insight to it can be a perplexing problem. Happily, the Lectionary offers up some interesting alternatives, fi rst in one important thing the Lectionary listing does not do and then in other important things that it does do. What the Lectionary does not do is include the Nicodemus narrative in the Gospel lesson. If the preacher chooses, of course, she may return it to its rightful place for some very powerful preaching. In any event, whether one explicitly connects this lesson to the Nicodemus narrative or not, the truth of that story must be kept in the near background if the preacher uses the Gospel lesson as listed, which is our recommendation. There are other opportunities in the Lectionary cycle to deal with the Nicodemus narrative. A safe and yet important way to approach preaching this week is to let the movement of the Gospel lesson as listed (Jn 3:14-21) inform not only the substance of the sermon but the shape the sermon as well. First, the very familiar John 3:16 is introduced with a reference to an image in the Old Testament lesson (more about that later). John uses the picture of a serpent held up on a pole to foreshadow the cross of Christ. The gospel lesson then moves to a bold (not to mention familiar) affi rmation of the love of God and a call to “whosoever” to believe as a requisite to everlasting life. Moving from there in verse 17, that view of salvation hope is then broadened immeasurably to include salvation for the whole created order. Then, in one fi nal movement, the text affi rms in the strongest possible terms that believing in Jesus is essential if one is to see and live into the light and hope revealed in and through Jesus, the Christ. Indeed, according to John, those who do not so believe walk in darkness. As the preacher moves through the concluding (judgmental) verses, she should be careful not to forget and to remind the congregation that the purpose of such judgement is that the whole world should see and walk in the light of Christ (v. 17). A more challenging and yet potentially timely approach to preaching this week would be to focus on the Numbers text (21:4-9) as cited by John and listed as the Old Testament lesson. It, of course, points to the bronze serpent held on a pole as a symbol depicting the worst that could happen becoming the symbol of greatest hope for God’s covenant people as they wander about in wastelands in pursuit of God promise. Little wonder John picked up that image as a prelude to viewing the cross of Christ. The analogy, of course, falls apart, but the truth of the imperfect analogy is nevertheless clear. In the Numbers narrative, the narrator clearly believes God sent the venomous serpents to punish the people for their grumbling faithlessness. That said, one may rightly conclude that in addition to a means of punishment, the serpent plague was also used to teach the covenant people important things about themselves, their faith, and, most importantly, about their God. That is, surely, they came to realize (again!) the importance of trusting God to lead them through their present wilderness experience and into God’s covenantal promise to them. Unlike the Numbers narrator and some (a few?) of our latter-day Christian brothers and sisters, we do not believe God sends such things as hurricanes, earthquakes, pandemics, and wildfi res to punish God’s people. We do, however, believe strongly that in the midst and wake of such catastrophic events, God teaches us things about ourselves, our faith, our God, and, most importantly, about trusting God to lead us through our various wastelands to God’s promise for us. In the pandemic, for example, compare the selfl ess service


    Page 8

    of medical and relief workers to the selfi shness of those who refuse to wear masks, maintain social distancing, and insist on holding large gatherings despite all scientifi c advice to the contrary. Likewise, examples of shameless greed compared to unspeakable generosity in the wake of natural disasters are more than abundant. How much greater, then, is the grace of God displayed in the cross of Christ than even the grace we see clearly displayed in God’s most faithful servants.

    Lent 5 For the last four weeks, we have encouraged preachers to consider following the thread of covenants through each of the Old Testament lessons. This week we come to the climax of the covenantal journey with the words of Jeremiah. As a whole, the book of Jeremiah is dark and nearly hopeless, and many of the themes in the larger book may resonate with today’s beleaguered worshipers. Jeremiah prophesizes judgment against Judah for its sins, chief among which was idolatry. The prophet, though, clearly loves his people and his nation, and so has a painful task of announcing their impending destruction at the hands of foreign powers, what we now know as the exile. Against this larger backdrop of doom, chapters 30-33 shine out with words of hope. As dark as it is and as dark as it will yet become, God’s judgment has limits. The God who brought Israel out of Egypt will not abandon them; the God who loved them like a spouse will not leave them forever. God will make one more covenant, and in this new covenant, the law will be written not on stone tablets, but on the hearts of the people. They will no longer need to teach one another God’s way. It will be their very nature. They will desire what God desires and will what God wills, by instinct. As water covered the earth to cleanse it in the days of Noah, now God’s forgiveness will fl ow like a cleansing fl ood. This language of new covenant is deeply resonant with the Christian proclamation , but before we move there, the preacher may want to pause and refl ect on the promise itself. To borrow the title of a contemporary hymn, “What is the world like when God’s will is done?” What does a family look like when all, oldest to youngest, acknowledge the Lord? What do our communities look like when we desire what God desires? What do nations look like when God’s ways are their ways? The hope of this text is that this dream-world, a world that is put right, is more than a pipe dream—it’s God’s promise. For the Christian preacher, this promise is fulfi lled in the death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, the story we will soon tell. The gospel proclamation is that in the person of Jesus, the promise of a new covenant has been actualized: in the supper he instituted, Jesus recreated the Passover meal that marked the fl ight out of Egypt; in the shedding of his blood, so fl ows God’s forgiveness. In the words of John’s Gospel, in him and in his death “is the judgment of the world. The ruler of the world is driven out” (12:31). Said another way, the prayer of David in Psalm 51 is fulfi lled, and not just for one but for all. By the power of the Spirit, God blots out iniquity and creates a clean heart and a right spirit (51:10) in the people God has made and claimed for God’s own. For the congregation that is living through dark days, just as for Jeremiah’s people, this new covenant is still a hope and feels terribly far off. Yet even though we do not yet possess this hope, by faith we hold on to it, and we do not despair. Even as we


    Page 9

    face challenges such as COVID19, a deeply divided nation, an ever warming and changing climate, the continuation of a multi-generational struggle for racial justice, to name only a few, we do not despair. Instead, we tell, and live, the story of the one who rode into Jerusalem in peace, suffered under Pontius Pilate, and on the third day rose again, the source of salvation and the glory of God in a human person.

    Conclusion We began this Lenten journey in the wilderness of Jesus’ temptation; we have now arrived in Jerusalem. The gospel reading for the fi fth Sunday opens with the famous words that in days past were inscribed on the pulpit to remind the preacher of the purpose of proclamation: “Sir, we wish to see Jesus” (Jn 12:20). Surely that is the hope of every person who cares to hear, or stream, a sermon in this season. It is easy enough to point to the trouble of the world, but no congregation needs its preacher to simply report the news. It is also relatively easy, and awfully tempting, to simply call a congregation to do better, to row harder against the storm of a world that seems less and less like the kingdom of God. The congregation needs more than that. Beyond the trouble of the world, we need the preacher to point to the grace in the world, which is to say we need the preacher to help us see what God is doing, has done, and promises to do. Yes, it’s dark, but we need the preacher to send up a fl are of gospel hope and then in that light share what she sees happening in the world. When we are called to action, when we are called to row against the storm, we need to be reminded that we row with the wind of the Spirit and sail on a divine tide that fl ows toward God’s good future. Indeed, we wish to see Jesus. Jesus the Christ is God’s future, the fulfi llment of God’s long project of putting the world right. God began the work with Noah and a bow in the sky, continued with a laughable promise made to Abraham and Sarah, stayed by the people when they wandered with serpents in the wilderness, wrote ten words on stone tablets and commanded they be taught from one generation to another. And when all else failed, in steadfast love, God became the Word Incarnate, crucifi ed and risen, who even now is making all things new.

  • Prayer in a Time of Crisis: A Personal Reflection from Scotland: An Iona Community Perspective—’Heaven in ordinarie’

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 42

    Prayer in a Time of Crisis:

    A Personal Refl ection from Scotland

    An Iona Community Perspective—“Heaven in ordinarie”1

    Norman Shanks

    Glasgow, Scotland

    This invitation—to offer some thoughts on prayer in this “time of crisis” reflecting the Iona Community’s experience—presents me with a huge challenge, both because of the multifaceted nature of the current situation (both national, in the UK as in the US, and international) and because, as I shall explain later, prayer has always been a struggle for me both in terms of personal discipline 2 and of leading public worship with honesty and integrity. Prayer, in its personal and public form, is the bedrock of faith and spirituality. Prayer and worship have always been central to the life and activities of the Iona Community since its founding in 1938. George MacLeod,3 the Community’s founder and first Leader (1938-67), who composed wonderful prayers on which he is said to have taken even more time than on sermon-preparation said, “You can’t get out of touch with God every moment that you live, for the simple reason that God is Life: not religious life, nor church life but the whole life we now live in the flesh.”4 The Community’s prayers reflect our shared values, priorities, and commitment, our view that faith and spirituality embrace and call us to engage with all aspects of life. Prayer and politics, work, and worship are thus seamlessly integrated, and the prayers are inevitably and invariably contextual and topical. Over the years, aspects of the Community’s liturgical approach (constantly evolving, essentially participative , inclusive, contextual, ecumenical) have been absorbed into the mainstream of the churches’ life in Scotland and elsewhere—e.g., songs from the world church; congregational responses; use of actions and movement, candles, silence, symbols and artefacts. And the Community has changed and grown, but the original vision, thrust, and purpose have remained constant—the commitment to the pursuit of justice and peace, the building of inclusive community, and the renewal of worship. During any “time of crisis” prayer and worship tend to take on even greater significance , become more particularly focussed. In the situation caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the usual pattern of the Community’s worship and prayers was adapted and the content geared towards current concerns and priorities. In Iona Abbey, whereas it is normal for guests, staff, and visitors to gather each day at 9 am and 9 pm Monday to Saturday with a Communion service at 10.30 am on Sundays, these arrangements, already affected by the closure of the Abbey’s guest accommodation from 2018 to 2020 for major refurbishment, were changed significantly during the “lockdown.” A small resident staff group maintained the daily pattern, but, as with so many local congregations and other organisations, new online possibilities were explored and developed. The Iona Abbey morning service, based on the Community’s “Office” but with elements changing each day, was made available through the Community’s website. Similarly the Tuesday evening Prayers for Healing was accessible online each week, linked to the work of the Community’s Prayer Circle, a long-standing


    Page 43

    world-wide network of intercession whose work, embracing social and individual needs, acquired additional impetus as the range and urgency of global emergencies increased. As the online services were developed, so their reach extended significantly. In early June 2020, over 650 people, mostly in the UK but a good number in the US, shared in a service of welcome and blessing for Ruth Harvey as she took over as Leader of the Community, and for seven New Members on completing the two-year joining process. A few days later on St Columba’s Day (9 June), 350 shared in the annual service of recommitment for the Community’s Associate Members. Each Tuesday evening during the “lockdown” up to early October, and then monthly thereafter, around 100 Members, together with some Associate Members, gathered to say the Community’s “Office” together and then in smaller “break-out groups” to share concerns; and it became evident how important this experience of solidarity and connectedness was to everyone, not least those in the US, coping with and living through the pandemic, the protests, and social unrest following the George Floyd murder and the lead-up to and aftermath of the Presidential election, while we in the UK are having to cope with the fiasco and social and economic consequences of Brexit. Members and many Associate Members meet together regularly in local Family Groups to account to one another for keeping of the communal discipline (including our use of money and time and our carbon footprint), to pray together, and to discuss Community business and topical issues. These meetings normally take place monthly, but many groups, through the “time of crisis,” chose to meet more often using Zoom, and this proved to be a helpful and supportive experience. Arrangements for the Community’s plenary meetings, when members of the Community gather generally for worship and discussion, usually three times a year, also had to change: the annual business meeting for reports and elections had to be conducted online; and owing to the Government’s “distancing” and travel restrictions, instead of the planned Community Week on Iona in mid-October, a special “Community Month” was held during November, enabling wider access to online daily worship and programme sessions focussing on the Community’s concerns. As the “lockdown” has continued, the Community’s activities online have been developed accordingly in a programme entitled “The Iona Way” that has included series of Bible studies and the live streaming from Iona Abbey of reflective worship on Christmas morning and a Hogmanay vigil at the turn of the year. Important parts of the Community’s continuing life are the Wild Goose Resource Group, who hold workshops, speak at conferences, produce a rich flow of hymns, prayers, and liturgies, and our publishing arm Wild Goose Publications, whose catalogue includes a wealth of material for worship and prayers in both printed and download form, most of it produced by Community Members and Associate Members. This material was well used last year, and an anthology of prayers and poems, Voices out of Lockdown, written early during the time of crisis by Community Members and Associate Members, is remarkable for its vigour, creativity, and diversity of material. The book’s editor, Jan Sutch Pickard, a gifted poet and liturgist and formerly Warden of Iona Abbey and vice-president of the UK Methodist Conference, in her preface describes the collection as “an example of our engaged spirituality. It explores shared experiences and asks tough questions. Faith for these writers takes different forms but doesn’t find easy answers.”5 Then in December, a further book was published,


    Page 44

    How Shall We Pray This Morning? For What Shall We Pray This Night? a month of worship resources for a time of pandemic, by Thom Shuman, one of the Associate Members based in Columbus, Ohio. The monthly e-Coracle, an online version of the Community’s thrice-yearly magazine, contains short articles and news about the Community’s concerns, and last year’s editions contained numerous prayers, reflections, and moving accounts of the “lockdown” experience of Members and Associate Members. The Community has always said that just as important as our work on Iona, and as what our staff there and working from our mainland base in Glasgow do “on our behalf,” or when Members act collectively, is what each of us does locally in living out our shared purpose and commitment. Community Members and Associate Members, as part of our Rule, pray daily for one another and for the Community’s concerns, including “the needs of the world,” on the basis of a monthly cycle. The different rhythm of life under lockdown gave Members added chance, in their personal devotional life, to develop awareness and experience of the contemplative approach to prayer as “self-surrender.” Members are actively engaged in leadership, many through ordained ministry, others through worship and pastoral care, in the life of local congregations of a range of different denominations. Over the past year, when church buildings were closed, the traditional arrangements for Sunday mornings suspended, and distancing restrictions prevented people meeting together, Members developed creative ways, primarily online and through social media, of keeping in touch with people and providing spiritual and pastoral support and encouragement through making available regular reflections and prayers, mitigating any sense of isolation, promoting connectedness, and ensuring that the sense of community was not lost. Each month for almost a year now Peter Millar, previously a Church of Scotland minister in south India and formerly an Abbey Warden who himself has produced several books of prayers, emailed world-wide a much appreciated reflection with his own prayers and insights interspersed with helpful quotations from other sources; and these were collected in a beautiful little book published in Advent, Candle in the Window; Reflections to Encourage Us in Tough Times.6 And each day for several 6 months earlier in the pandemic, one of the Community’s New Members, Marvyn Mackay, used WhatsApp to “post” a couple of Wild Goose Resource Group songs, accompanied by a short reflection and the relevant reference from the Community’s cycle of daily prayer. Ruth Harvey, shortly after taking over as Leader of the Iona Community last June, in the keynote address at an on-line meeting of our sister Corrymeela Community which seeks reconciliation in Northern Ireland, spoke of the need for hope, vision, and the search for new ways of belonging together in difficult and challenging situations . Using the Chinese pictogram for “crisis,” which combines two separate symbols for “danger” and “opportunity,” she emphasised that these times, however dark and demanding, provide the chance to dream of and plan for a better, fairer future, a different world with different priorities. These themes have also been picked up and explored publicly by other Members. David Coleman, Environmental Chaplain to Scotland’s Eco-Congregation Network , who leads worship in many different churches and other settings, said in relation to times of fear and uncertainty, “Crisis is actually the mode in which Christianity,


    Page 45

    and Christian prayer, makes sense.” And he described prayer as a means of living with fear, not denying it: of becoming reconciled to mortality, not in seeking repair, recovery, or return to “the good old days” but instead finding hope not in the illusion of an omnipotent, all-controlling God but in “experiencing rather the presence of d d God in the darkness.” John Bell of the Wild Goose Resource Group conducted the BBC Radio 4 Sunday morning worship on 28 June as part of a series of programmes entitled “ReThink,” when speakers from a wide range of different fields envisioned a new post-crisis future. Very effectively and creatively through scripture, song, reflection , and music, John encouraged and inspired listeners to look beyond present difficulties and restrictions to reimagine a new future–better than and different from the past—and to play a part in bringing it about. Prayer is a journey into mystery, an orientation as much as an activity, a potentially transforming encounter with “the beyond in our midst.” In and through prayer we seek to deepen and strengthen our connection and connectedness with God–the ultimate reality beyond our comprehension yet ever in our midst, the creative power bursting with potential, to which we are given the opportunity to open ourselves, respond and, as it were, “plug in.”7 And our prayers are rooted also in and threaded through with our connectedness with and concern for the world and all its joys and needs, and with others, reflecting that we are part of what Barbara Brown Taylor has so tellingly described as “an infinite web of relationship,”8 beyond time and place. Prayer emanates both from the sense of wonder, adoration, and gratitude and from despair, helplessness, and a recognition of frailty (hence the not infrequent resort of “atheists” to prayer in extremis r ). And prayer is permeated with, perhaps even depends on, hope—for our world and ourselves. So a time of crisis provides, alongside dissatisfaction with the present, the opportunity for reassessment, reorientation, recalibration, recommitment to a vision of a radically new, better, fairer future, to the possibility of doing things differently—personally, socially, politically. And critically prayer is rooted in, reflects, expresses, and is constrained by our understanding of God. In this respect, the leader of public prayer, whether ordained preacher or “lay-person,” bears an awesome responsibility. As I have grown older, while in some respects my religious and theological convictions have become stronger, I have increasing difficulty in articulating certain aspects of my faith, particularly concerning Christology and the doctrine of the Trinity. My belief in God as present reality, the ever-trustworthy epitome of grace and truth, is stronger than ever. However , I no longer find it helpful to understand or address “God” in personal terms, or to regard Jesus as more than the conclusive embodiment of God in history,9 “pioneer and perfecter of faith,” whose life provides a model of “the Way” towards fulfilment of identity and fullness of life for all; and I struggle with the notion of God as agent “working his purpose out,”10 as the familiar hymn puts it. Owing to our limitations of language and comprehension, the fullness of God cannot be encapsulated in any single image or expression: Brian Wren’s wonderful hymn Bring Many Names11 covers a range of personal metaphors—male and female, old and young; but I have come to prefer something like “love-force” or “life-energy” (more dynamic than Tillich’s “ground of our being”), while recognising that this is too abstract for the liking of many. And increasingly I struggle to understand the concept of the sovereignty and omnipotence of God. Although I am bound to accept the element of agency and will and design in the initial act of creation (in other words


    Page 46

    that we humans and the world we live in are not simply the result of some cosmic evolutionary accident), I cannot reconcile an all-powerful, loving God with the suffering and need in the world and the tragedies that afflict the lives of individuals, families, and communities. Pain and suffering remain a terrible reality, an apparently insoluble mystery. The hymn tells us God moves in a mysterious way,12 but if God is sovereign and caring, why does God allow it to happen and not intervene to prevent misfortune and change things for the better? And what sense can we make of the idea of God “hearing” or “responding” to prayer? So I have come to see and understand the loving purpose and continuing activity of God in terms of the creative force that brought the world into being, incarnated in the life of Jesus, pointing the way to the fullness of life that is the desire and destiny of every human heart, present still in the power of the Spirit, supportive, disturbing, promising new life, with us through thick and thin, from which nothing can separate us. But this Spirit-power is essentially latent, needing to be tapped and released, presence rather than agent: God is—I AM WHO I AM.13 God does not do (in the sense of initiating) things other than through human agency: as the famous prayer of St Teresa of Avila puts it, God has no body, hands, feet, or eyes on earth but ours; our unstinting calling and responsibility is to be not only witnesses but also channels of God’s love and compassion. Thus in the time of pandemic, in the churches’ prayers, there was acknowledgement of the ways and places in which God’s loving purpose was “working”–for instance through the scientists trying to develop the vaccine, the staff of the intensive care wards, the care-home workers, the dustbin-collectors, the good neighbours, the points at which more enlightened political leaders expressed and reflected the hopes and fears of the nation. The form and formulation of our Christian creeds and confessions—and prayers too—stem from the human compulsion to make sense of and describe our experience of and relationship with the divine and the tendency (perhaps inevitable) to project on to the divine—in, through and from which they originate–human qualities, attributes, and ideals. The word person is derived from the Latin persona originally meaning an actor’s mask; so the persons of the Trinity come to be seen as “masks,” aspects or manifestations of God–God in the beginning, personified as “Creator”; God in history, incarnate in Jesus, as “Redeemer,” “Saviour,” or “Liberator,” trailblazer of “the Way”; God in the here-and-now, in the power and presence of the Spirit. The perpetual challenge to those who are called to preach and lead prayers is how to do so with personal and intellectual integrity while exercising sensitive and helpful pastoral ministry–how to, at one and the same time, as has been said, “comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.” There is always going to be a gap between the state of our societies, our own personal lives and the vision of the kingdom, God’s shalom: within the community of faith, we have to live and cope with continuing “eschatological dissatisfaction”!14 The traditional pattern of prayers within public worship, flowing from adoration and approach to confession and supplication, then to thanksgiving and intercession, expresses this discontent–with the state of our lives and the life of the world—and moves into concern and commitment, seeking and hoping for healing and wholeness, the overcoming of barriers and divisions, the attainment of peace and justice, the fulfilment of our hopes and dreams. But I have come to ask myself increasingly if the customary form and language of our prayers (and of so many of our hymns) does


    Page 47

    not tend to imply and encourage the belief that only God can bring this about, that somehow if we pray hard and often enough, God will sort it out? And accordingly our role and responsibility is reduced, marginalised, even excluded altogether. At the same time I acknowledge the force of the old truisms that we should “be careful what we pray for…” and that prayers are always “answered” but not in the way we may expect. And I accept that within this realm of unfathomable mystery, uncertainty, and risk are of the essence, there are depths of spiritual, emotional, and intellectual experience beyond explanation and articulation, and ultimately it all boils down to trusting, feeling, and indeed knowing in a profound way that “all manner of thing shall be well.”15 So in both preaching and preparing prayers for public worship, I seek to be true to my own convictions–with a message of vision and hope, but also provisionality rather than certainty, encouragement to “live with the questions” rather than expect conclusive answers. But I recognise too that our worship and prayers are offered within the community of faith, with its age-old, well-hallowed forms and traditions, and that among the congregation there will be a wide range of sincerely held beliefs, needs, aspirations, and expectations as well as views that I may regard as misguided. So I look to produce prayers that respect and are helpful to others but do not involve compromise or collusion on my part–a challenging task. It is perhaps especially in the prayers of supplication and petition and those of concern for others (intercession, the “prayers of the people”) that the challenge is strongest. Adoration, confession, and thanksgiving tend to be more straightforward! So far as possible I do not use personal images of God or address prayers to Jesus; I tend not to use terms such as “Lord” or “King,” but I find I cannot–nor would wish to—avoid attributing to God human qualities and values (e.g., “God of generosity and grace”) of which indeed God may be regarded as epitome and source; so themes of grace, hope, and trust are prominent. In the prayers of confession and concern, I usually leave space for the congregation , whether silently or openly, to offer their own prayers, and, in the intercessions, without introducing a “shopping-list” or geographical tour of places of suffering and need, it is helpful, as well as naming individuals if appropriate, to focus on issues and situations that may be topical and urgent–appealing to conscience perhaps and raising awareness but without moralising through veiled social commentary. Most importantly , in framing petitions and intercessions, I try to avoid explicitly calling on God to intervene or act. While our prayers are directed towards God–are offered to God, take place in, with, and through God—they are essentially, whether individually or communally, an expression of our commitment and solidarity, our hopes, aspirations, and intentions despite our frailty and vulnerability: we are seeking “to transform the world not by getting power over it but by entrusting ourselves to God in prayer,”16 thus to change not God but ourselves–strengthened in and by God’s grace and by the support of our companions within the community of faith and beyond. So the verbs in the prayer will be expressed in subjunctive rather than imperative form (to avoid implying God’s agency or requesting God to act)–“may our hearts be open,” “let justice roll down like waters,” etc. And yet alongside this, I am suffi ciently conservative and conformist to repeat without diffi culty the parts of the Lord’s Prayer that ask God to “do things” (“Give us today our daily bread,” “Forgive us our sins,” etc) and happily to share the words of the Iona Community’s “Offi ce”–“Move among


    Page 48

    us, O God, give us life; let your people rejoice in you. Make our hearts clean within us; renew us in mind and in spirit. Give us again the joy of your help; with your spirit of freedom sustain us.”17 At a time of crisis, where feelings of uncertainty, risk, and vulnerability, even despair are running high, there is inevitably a heightened urgency about our prayers. Within the United Kingdom, under last year’s Covid-19 “lockdown,” churches were closed on 23 March. Following representations, particularly from the Roman Catholic church, church buildings were reopened initially for “private prayer” and funerals with limited numbers (but many Protestant churches remained closed along with mosques, synagogues, and temples of other faiths); and it was only some weeks later that buildings could be opened for public worship and community activities, but even then subject to strict “physical distancing” restrictions. During the “shutdown,” churches throughout the United Kingdom responded very creatively by arranging online services, whether pre-recorded or “Zoomed,” meetings, workshops, Bible studies, and social events, and seeking, through social media, increased use of web-sites and phone calls, to ensure that contacts were maintained and pastoral needs attended to. Ruth Harvey, looking to the Iona Community’s future, has put it well in saying “We are known worldwide as a religious community that prays. And we have within our midst some fabulous prayers, leaders, refl ectors. This is such a rich part of our history, and of our present life…. How do we bind ourselves together while also freeing us to explore and experiment in prayer?” This is the continuing challenge that faces us all. During these past months, we have had the opportunity to reappraise our priorities and also to refl ect on social values and the future wellbeing of society. In this experience, we may have had the chance too to think about the nature, content, and transformative potential of our prayers–to deepen and strengthen our connectedness with God and the people and world around us, to learn anew to trust in the eternal mystery of God’s irresistible grace and steadfast love. Timothy Beaumont’s version of Psalm 91 (which I am always happy to sing despite the personal imagery!) sums it up so effectively:

    Safe in the shadow of the Lord possessed in love divine, I trust in him, I trust in him And meet his love with mine18

    Notes 1 “Prayer” (1) by the English priest-poet George Herbert (1593-1633), The Poems of George Herbert (London: The World’s Classics, Oxford University Press, 1961), 44. 2 Members of the Iona Community are committed to a four-fold Rule, the fi rst element of which specifi es “daily prayer, worship with others, and regular engagement with the Bible and other material which nourishes us.” For information about the Iona Community (a dispersed Christian ecumenical community working for peace and social justice, rebuilding of community and the renewal of worship) see www. iona.org.uk; also of interest may be Ron Ferguson, Chasing the Wild Goose (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 1997), Norman Shanks, Iona—God’s Energy: the Vision and Spirituality of the Iona Community (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2009), and Kathy Galloway, Keeping the Rule (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2011). I am indebted to those members of the Community who, in response to my request, provided me with their own refl ections on their experience of “prayer in the midst of a pandemic and national crisis.”


    Page 49

    3 The Very Rev Lord MacLeod of Fuinary (1895-1992). See also Ron Ferguson, George MacLeod (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2001); The Whole Earth Shall Cry Glory: Iona Prayers by Rev George F MacLeod (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 1985); Ron Ferguson (ed), Daily Readings with George MacLeod (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2001). 4 From “Sermon on Prayer, July 1955,” Ron Ferguson (ed), Daily Readings with George MacLeod (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2001), 22. 5 Jan Sutch Pickard (ed), Voices out of Lockdown (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2020), 7. 6 Peter Millar, Candle in the Window; Refl ections to Encourage Us in Tough Times (published privately, 2020), obtainable by contacting ionacottage@hotmail.com. 7 In his introduction to In the gift of this new day: Praying with the Iona Community—Neil Paynter (ed) (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2015), 16. Ian Fraser, a Community member with a worldwide reputation within the ecumenical movement who died in 2018 aged 100, quoting the words of his mentor Professor John Baillie, said prayer is “the practice of the presence of God; living with the awareness that God is at hand; making ourselves available, both as persons and communities, to be so conformed to the mind of Christ that we pray and work for God’s kingdom to come and God’s will to be done on earth as in heaven.” 8 Barbara Brown Taylor, The Luminous Web: Essays on Science and Religion (Cowley Publications, 2000), 73-74, quoted in Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 25 June 2020. 9 I no longer fi nd the approach that identifi es Jesus as “best friend” or “companion” satisfactory: it strikes me as over-familiar and uncomfortably sentimental. However, I recognise and respect the fact that for many, this is an essential part of their personal faith. 10 Ancient to Modern Hymns and Songs for Refreshing Worship, 646; Church Hymnary (4th edition), 235. 11 Presbyterian Hymnal, 760; Church Hymnary (4th edition), 134. 12 Presbyterian Hymnal, 369; Church Hymnary (4th edition), 158. 13 Exodus 3.14. 14 This evocative, almost onomatopoetic phrase was, I think, fi rst used by the English theologian R.H. Preston, but I have been unable to trace its precise source. 15 Mother Julian of Norwich; T.S. Eliot, “Little Gidding” in Collected Poems, 1909-1962 (London: Faber, 1963), 223. 16 Gilbert Markus, “Ring out your prayer: early Irish hand-bells” quoted in Paynter (ed), Ibid, 117. 17 Iona Community Prayer Book 2020; The Iona Community, Iona Abbey Worship Book (Glasgow: Wild Goose Publications, 2017), 63. 18 Presbyterian Hymnal 595; l l Church Hymnary (4th edition) 55.

  • The Spirit, the Lament, and the Dream

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 20

    The Spirit, the Lament, and the Dream

    Tod Bolsinger

    Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, California

    Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness,where for forty days he was tempted by the devil….” (Luke 4:1-2, NRSV)

    14Then Jesus, fi lled with the power of the Spirit… stood up to read, 17and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written: 18“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, 19to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” 20And he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down. The eyes of all in the synagogue were fi xed on him. 21Then he began to say to them, “Today this scripture has been fulfi lled in your hearing.” (Luke 4:14, 17-21, NRSV)

    It was August 28, 1963, and the mall in front of the Lincoln Memorial was fi lled with more than 250,000 people. After a long afternoon of stirring speeches, gospel singer Mahalia Jackson sang two spirituals that caused Roger Mudd of CBS to remark , “All the speeches in the world couldn’t have brought the response that just came from the hymns she sang.” A rabbi spoke, and then Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. led into his prepared remarks. The words for this occasion had come slowly to the acknowledged leader of the civil rights movement. Drawing from the deep wellspring of the struggle for black Americans to experience the justice and freedom proclaimed in their homeland, he and his confi dantes had worked late into the evening. This speech was not to be just the words of an eloquent preacher; it was a gift of the centuries-long black struggle. This moment was bringing attention to the blood, sacrifi ce, and courage of so many who had labored in the long fi ght for freedom for the African-American community. They knew that they would be speaking to a nationwide audience. And they also knew they would be speaking directly to people who had experienced fi rsthand beatings, jail, being attacked by dogs and humiliated by neighbors. Dr. King and his companions had debated which themes to use in what was an allotted fi ve minutes of speaking time. Dr. King himself had spent the night writing in longhand, and by 4 a.m., he had put the fi nishing touches on a text that was meant to be both sobering and thoughtful, absent of infl ammatory rhetoric, but sternly calling the nation to account for the ongoing denial of rights to so many of its citizens. Dr. King’s speech began more scholarly than soaring, and when he stumbled on a line that he didn’t think would work, he began to riff off-script. It was just then that the preacher heard the gospel singer crying out from behind him, “Tell them about the dream, Martin! Tell them about the dream.” Dr. King’s associate and speechwriter Clarence B. Jones, who was seated nearby,


    Page 21

    heard Mahalia Jackson’s words and saw Dr. King glance at Jackson and put his notes aside. Jones said to the person sitting next to him, “These people out there, they don’t know it, but they are about ready to go to church.” Dr. King launched into the words that have now become hallowed in our American history, “I have a dream.” Like Jesus in the synagogue so many years before, he drew on the imagery of Isaiah, the vision of the transformed world soaring across the Washington Mall. “I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all fl esh shall see it together.”1 Dr. King paused and brought that imagery right down to the blood-stained soil of 1960s Alabama and Mississippi and the daunting task ahead of all of them. “This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with.” Because of what God is doing and will certainly fi nish doing some day, the Preacher King proclaims to those who had come—many of them from the marches, the protests, the hoses, the dogs, and the jails of the south—”We can go back to the south.” Because of what God’s own presence is doing, because God’s own glory will someday be revealed to all fl esh and all creation will be confronted with the world made right, King declares, we can go back to the hoses and dogs and jails, back to the sneers and threats and beatings, back to the separate lunch counters and segregated buses and hotels, back to the redlined neighborhoods and racial slurs that fl ow from unjust legal codes and hardened hearts: “With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.” With faith in what the God of justice will accomplish one day, we can go back, this day, to the hard work of transforming despair into hope. It is this juxtaposition between the future hope and the present heartache that meets the preacher on Pentecost. It is the pouring out of the Spirit that Jesus received right before the wilderness temptations and which Jesus proclaimed as good news for the poor, for captives, for the oppressed.. Jesus, the one who declared that his presence was good news—especially to those experiencing the most pain in this world—announced that the same Spirit and his use of the same biblical prophet was itself a proclamation of God’s presence. In doing so, he reveals an often overlooked part of that celebration: The Spirit comes into the world to change it. Pentecost is not “rapture.” It’s not a taking up, but a pouring out. It’s not the Lord lifting us on “eagle’s wings” (at least not yet!), but the Spirit baptizing us and the very soil of this fallen world that we inhabit with the very presence of God’s own self. God enters into the world to make it free, to release peoples from captivity, to give sight to the blind, to give liberation to the oppressed, and to give back to people their lands and livelihoods, their places, their homes. This is not just a blessing of those gathered in that Roman-occupied city of Jerusalem nor a sign that is meant to convince people to a purely religious conversion, but it is a demonstration of how the creator God is present, active, entering in—even into the native tongues of all the disparate people—and making them into one new people to live as a sign of the future transformation of the whole creation. Make no mistake, this is a great and glorious day, this Pentecost. Jesus himself


    Page 22

    said that the pouring out of the Spirit on all people was better than his own personal fl esh and blood presence…, but it is only a beginning. The Spirit comes into the brutal and broken places, entering into the injustice, the division, the oppression and strife (yes, the marches, the hoses, the dogs, the jails), and in Jesus, names the brokenness. When Dr. King shared the vision of Isaiah’s prophecy of a world made right, he also names the brokenness of injustice that had been the long march of over 400 years for those of African descent on American soil. For pastoral leaders committed to participating in the change that God is bringing to the world, the practice for addressing the uncomfortable and brutal reality of the suffering of our neighbors and the pain of our friends without losing hope means bringing God—with the same brutal honesty—into our experiences. In biblical language this is called the spiritual practice of lament. It is the “language of suffering,” theologian Soong-Chan Rah explains as he helps us understand this most honest, and often disturbing, type of prayer:

    Laments are prayers of petition arising out of need. But lament is not simply the presentation of a list of complaints, nor merely the expression of sadness over diffi cult circumstances. Lament in the Bible is a liturgical response to the reality of suffering and engages God in the context of pain and trouble. The hope of lament is that God would respond to human suffering that is wholeheartedly named and offered as lament.2

    Laments are prayers that face the brutal facts of our world, the pain points of our lives, and the challenges of our callings, and invite God right into the swirl of that disturbing moment as the one who is the primary and responsible actor during each crisis. In this way, Pentecost is a proclamation that is borne in lament. It is hope that is being proclaimed in the voices of prophecy and visions of the Scriptures; it is hope that is, in the words of Dr. King, “hewed” out of “a mountain of despair.” For the preacher that is also a pastor, speaking to a congregation and leading them to faithfully participate in the mission of God, loving neighbors, making disciples, embodying and extending the Reign of God, Pentecostal lament is a most powerful tool. For leadership expert Jim Collins, leading change does not begin in a vision, but in a disciplined process of “confronting the brutal facts.”3 For Collins, the genesis of change is not our inspired ideas, but the pain, problems, brokenness, and challenges we see in the world and for our organizations. Change leaders don’t arise from a great vision; they are raised to meet a great need. And when leaders gather people to address the brutal facts, the fi rst response is not knee-jerk reactions, but deep refl ection so that our actions come from a deeper attunement to the greater context and condition of the pain. For Dr. King, the inspiration for the speech in August of 1963 was not in the fi rst sense about a dream, but instead about a broken promise. He and the other civil rights leaders who gathered on the mall in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC, had come to an event called “the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.” Dr. King’s speech was to make clear the way that African American citizens of the United States had been given promises that even one hundred years after the abolition of slavery had not been kept:


    Page 23

    One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and fi nds himself in exile in his own land. And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition. In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnifi cent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked insuffi cient funds.

    Laments remind us that our capacity to lead in the world, especially when leading at the place of despair, resistance, and the failures of nerve and heart, is met with the power of the God who is present and is active. The leader is made stronger, like Jacob, through brutally honest wrestling with God in prayer about the brutal facts of our lives. As Old Testament scholar John Goldingay says, “The psalms give a lot of space to describing, protesting, and lamenting…; the psalms are very general in what we ask God to do and very detailed about our need.”4 Laments are powerful pastoral leadership tools because they reinforce to those leading the change that the way to avoid both accommodating the status quo and falling into cynicism is not to deny the mountain of despair, but to confront it head-on with honesty and hope, with courage and urgency. The very attributes of a faithful lament. Dr. King again:

    But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insuffi cient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice…. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God’s children.

    For the pastoral leader who is proclaiming the presence of the Spirit as good news on Pentecost, there is a moment here to refl ect, to name, to pray, and to try to see what God is doing before we rush in to do what we might. Pentecost allows us to name the God that is present and empowering us to participation in God’s own redeeming, healing, liberating, and transforming work. Pentecostal Lament allows us to tell the truth and trust God’s Spirit to meet us in the moment, doing what we couldn’t imagine and calling us to what we could otherwise not even see. Lament teaches us to be both more honest and more open to the reality that God is at work, even when we are bewildered and bedeviled by the brutality of pain and opposition.


    Page 24

    By acknowledging the brutal facts of a situation and letting them lead us into prayers of lament, we galvanize the energy that brings resilience, reinforces even the smallest movement of momentum, and staves off cynicism. Laments are acts of faith that strengthen the one praying for faithful, persistent, and tenacious action. Edwin Friedman drew upon that same visionary speech when he was consulting with leaders who were bogged down and disoriented by their own despair as they sought to bring change. He wrote that there was a similarity to their stories where they became mired in moments of discouragement and defensiveness. They became stuck, burned out, or had begun to give in to the most dysfunctional forces in the system. In short, they had forgotten to lead. “I therefore stopped listening to the content of everyone’s complaints and, irrespective of the location of their problem or the nature of their institution, began saying the exact same thing to everyone: You have to get up before your people and give an ‘I Have a Dream’ speech.’”5 Friedman discovered that whether or not the leaders’ own “I Have a Dream Speech” rallied the community to a shared vision, just articulating the vision energized the leaders. The act of naming the truth about a people’s history for the present moment and casting a vision of change created focus, clarity, and self-defi nition for the leaders would often renew their calling to be, in Friedman’s words, “the strength in the system.” Preaching lament empowers leaders with vision and courage to carry on. What we have learned from prophets of the Hebrew scriptures, the prayers of the early church, the preachers and marchers of the black freedom struggle, and those who have faithfully journeyed even when they have not experienced the rest of the promised land is the power of lament to sustain resilience. When Dr. King looked out on the crowd gathered on the Washington Mall, he could see their faces and name the pain of the gathered people, mindful, he said, that some “have come here out of great trial,” that others had come “fresh from narrow jail cells,” and that many, like those who had for decades labored for racial justice, had been “battered by the storms of persecution…and police brutality.” Through the honest words of lament, he offered a charge to tenacious endurance:

    You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.

    Understood in this way, Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech that August day before the Lincoln Memorial, that began with brutal honesty and ended with a soaring dream, was a classic lament. With the vision of Isaiah and the acknowledgement of the painful moment in history, it was Pentecostal. It was a clear-eyed reckoning of the injustice that white America continued to infl ict upon its black citizens. But it was not just a protest; it was a proclamation. And as a lament, it did what laments do: it proclaimed the Spirit to energize a movement to carry on. “With this faith, I go back to the south.” King’s voice sang out. And so he did.


    Page 25

    Notes 1 Martin Luther King Jr., “I Have a Dream,” Delivered at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom ,” Stanford University, accessed October 7, 2019, https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/ documents/i-have-dream-address-delivered-march-washington-jobs-and-freedom. 2 Soong-Chan Rah, Prophetic Lament: A Call for Justice in Troubled Times (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2015), 22. 3 Jim Collins discusses his view that real change starts not in a vision but in a deep look at the brutal facts of a situation. Jim Collins, “Keeping the Flywheel in Motion,” Knowledge Project Podcast, accessed October 8, 2019, https://fs.blog/jim-collins. 4 “The Psalms of Lament,” Fuller Seminary, accessed October 9, 2019, https://vimeo.com/99780901. 5 Edwin H. Friedman, A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (New York: Church Publishing, 2017), loc. 455-460, Kindle.

  • Empty

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 30

    Empty

    Matthew 28:1-10

    Scott Black Johnston

    Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church, New York, New York

    Listen now, my friends, for the proclamation our hearts yearn to hear, the story of the fi rst Easter, as found in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter twenty-eight, beginning with the fi rst verse:

    1After the sabbath, as the fi rst day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb. 2And suddenly there was a great earthquake; for an angel of the Lord, descending from heaven, came and rolled back the stone and sat on it. 3His appearance was like lightning, and his clothing white as snow. 4For fear of him the guards shook and became like dead men. 5But the angel said to the women, ‘Do not be afraid; I know that you are looking for Jesus who was crucifi ed. 6He is not here; for he has been raised, as he said. Come, see the place where he lay. 7Then go quickly and tell his disciples, “He has been raised from the dead, and indeed he is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see him.” This is my message for you.’ 8So they left the tomb quickly with fear and great joy, and ran to tell his disciples.9 Suddenly Jesus met them and said, ‘Greetings!’ And they came to him, took hold of his feet, and worshipped him. 10Then Jesus said to them, ‘Do not be afraid; go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.’

    Today is our high holy day. Easter is Christianity’s big celebration. It is fl ashing trumpets in the balcony. It is an embarrassment of fl owers in the chancel. It is robust singing fi lling the sanctuary. It is a packed house for a pull-out-all-the-stops shindig! Every year, as people fi le out of our lily-scented services, shaking my hand and stepping toward the funky embrace of the Fifth Avenue Easter Day parade, there is always some eager soul who says to me, “Wouldn’t it be great if it were like this every Sunday?” I smile—a weary, end-of-Holy-Week smile. I nod. Today, my friends, I want to let you in on something. That nod is a lie. I do not want every Sunday to be like Easter the same way I do not want every meal to be blueberry pie, and I really enjoy blueberry pie. You might call me (as my wife does) “an Easter curmudgeon.” And you would be right. It’s not that I dislike Easter. My faith is grounded in this day, wrestles with the meaning of this day, yearns for the truth of this day like no other day. I cherish Easter. So, what’s the source of my grumpiness? Well, I worry…, I worry that in our rush to make a big deal about Easter, we sidestep the deep places this day wants to take us. When public fi gures comment that Easter will be “sad” this year because sanctuaries will be empty, I groan. When The Today Show runs a story entitled “11 Tips on how make Easter special during coronavirus,” l I cringe. I know…, I know. These people are trying to help us cope, but seriously, big crowds and Rice Crispy bunnies are not what makes Easter special. According to the Good Book, the fi rst Easter was not a runway for displaying t


    Page 31

    new outfi ts, pastel bowties, and glorious hats. It was two women walking through a cemetery dressed in black—dressed in the clothes you wear when your heart is torn up by grief. The fi rst Easter was not a chorus of angelic voices; it was (according to the Gospel of Matthew) an earthquake—a cataclysm that cracked stones and opened graves. It was an angel descending on the wings of a storm—an angel that looked, Scripture says, like lightning! The fi rst Easter was not photos of a cozy brunch posted to Instagram. The disciples did not toast their good fortune with fl utes of mimosas. On the fi rst Easter, Christ’s followers were in hiding. They were sheltering in place. They were shaking in terror—worried (if they stuck their heads out-of-doors) that they too would end up nailed to a cross. The fi rst Easter wasn’t a victory lap. It wasn’t confetti and applause. It wasn’t a celebration at all. The fi rst Easter dawned on a world saturated with fear, ringed by death, shaken by God, and blessed by the loving actions of a few brave souls. All of which is to say, the fi rst Easter was a lot like this Easter. There is hope to be found in this comparison. Sturdy hope. Stick-to-your-ribs hope. Hope strong enough to lift even a curmudgeon’s heart. Let’s see if we can spot it. Let’s start by looking at fear. The fi rst Easter was soaked in fear. The Good Book makes this crystal clear. It is a refrain. The soldiers guarding the tomb of Jesus fall to the ground in fear. On seeing Mary Magdalene and the other Mary standing at the entrance to the tomb, the very fi rst words out of the angel’s mouth are “Do not fear.” When the women fl ee the garden cemetery, they run in fear. Fear was in the air that fi rst Easter. We can identify. In an interview, Miroslav Volf, theologian at Yale Divinity School, observed: “Fear is like a virus. Fear is infectious.” When we come in contact with others who are afraid, we become afraid too. We pass anxiety along—from one person to another. Today, we face a pandemic of fear. And no, we haven’t developed immunity. Fear keeps re-infecting us—waking us in the middle of the night. What is the source of all this fear? The obvious answer, of course, is the virus. Covid-19 presents a danger to our loved ones, our fi nances, our future. Our fears do not stop there. This virus is an insidious thing. We cannot see it. Who knows where it may lurk? This makes us suspicious of each other—anxious and angry with each other. All this fear tears at the already thin fabric of our society. In this unsettling time, the roots of our anxiety feed off the granddaddy of all fears—the fear of death. We fear the death of family members, the death of friends, the death of artists we respect (God bless you, John Prine). We fear the death that awaits each of us. Nothing knocks our knees together like the grim reaper. Nothing pumps fear through our veins like the pictures of bodies, wrapped in sheets, being pushed toward refrigerated trucks. Easter gets this. The fi rst Easter was totally in tune with this. Every step the women take brings fl ashbacks of those crosses lining the slopes of Golgotha. They are afraid. Who wouldn’t be? They fear for their safety. They fear for their fading faith—their tattered hopes. They fear the forces of darkness have won and will always win. They fear the world is an irredeemably violent and malicious place, devoid of good and full of make-shift morgues. I mean tombs. Death and fear perfume Easter. But here’s the thing, and yes, this sentiment comes straight from my curmudgeon’s heart: I take comfort from the fact that Easter starts this way. Yes, the backdrop to our holiest of days is dire, but, this, my friends, this is what makes Easter “special.” This is why Easter matters. We celebrate that fi rst


    Page 32

    fear-soaked Easter over and over, because it was there, in the trenches of Holy Week, that we learned who God really is. God, it turns out, does not do distancing. God steps into places where death lurks and fear unspools us. God stands with us—always with us. And when our hopes teeter, God does what only God can do. The Almighty declares that Jesus, this wise teacher, this caring healer, this gracious friend, this beloved child of heaven is not dead. Jesus is not fi nished—not now, not ever. He is risen. This changes everything. Matthew puts it like this, “The two women left the tomb quickly with fear and great joy.” Did you catch the shift? Fear hasn’t been vanquished, not yet, but when Easter dawns, fear fi nds a companion. Joy. Great joy. As many of you know, every Easter, at some point during the day, my phone rings. When I pick it up, a voice—with no introduction, no pleasantries of any kind—declares , “Jesus is on the loose.” The next sound I hear is the click of the connection ending. I know who it is. It’s my roommate from seminary. It’s his quirky way of saying “Christ is Risen.” Over the years, other friends (including many of you) have joined in. Now, I get all sorts of texts and emails declaring “Jesus is on the loose.” It wouldn’t be Easter without this wild, joyful chorus. This rambunctious joy has its roots in the actions of Mary Magdalene and the other Mary. The two women race to tell the disciples. He’s out there. Death could not stop the goodness of God. The love of Christ persists. The promise endures, his outlandish promise, “I am with you always.” It’s true. Listen again to how Mathew describes it. “Then Jesus said to them, ‘Do not be afraid; go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.’” He’s out there. You can fi nd him in Galilee. You can fi nd him in Queens. You can fi nd him in Seoul, Korea. You can fi nd him in New Orleans. Is that true? Chrissy and Mark are members of this congregation. For over a year they have been trying to adopt a child from South Korea. Last year, they got really close to an adoption, and then it fell through. It was a sad day, but they were not defeated. Their persistent love kept at it. This past winter, Mark and Chrissy were connected with another child, a little boy named James Han Wool. They fell in love with him and made preparations to leave for South Korea. Then coronavirus hit. In an email, Chrissy asked: “What do you do when your child is on the other side of the planet during a pandemic?” Evidently the answer goes something like this: • You stay up until three in the morning setting up a room for a toddler in your apartment. • Then you race to JFK and board a plane—not certain what awaits you on the other side. • You get tested and quarantined in a country where you do not know the language . • You advocate tirelessly with adoption agencies and a legal system that you do not fully understand. • You are blessed by the grace and hospitality of strangers. • You wear a t-shirt that says, “No bump, still pumped!” • You hang onto each other and to a picture of your child-to-be. • And you hope….You cling to crazy, stubborn, faithful hope.

    This past week I video-conferenced with these two persistent souls from their


    Page 33

    temporary digs in Seoul. Mark and Chrissy toured me around their apartment and updated me on their adventures—all with breathless energy. It might have been caffeine. Something powerful was animating the other end of our trans-pacifi c zoom—something that sounded a lot like joy. “Do not be afraid;” Jesus said to the women, “Tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.’ Beth and Joe Poe are members of St. Charles Avenue Presbyterian Church in New Orleans. Beth has given me permission to tell this story to you. Beth and Joe live in the hottest of hotspots in the Big Easy—a place called Lambeth House. Lambeth House is a multiphase retirement and care facility that has, thus far, lost 28 residents to coronavirus. This has been a challenging time for Beth and Joe—retired professors from Tulane. Beth, you see, lives in an apartment on one side of Lambeth House, while Joe, her husband, who suffered a severe stroke a few years ago, resides in the Memory Care section of the facility. Every day, Beth typically goes to Joe’s room and wheels him back to her apartment. There they listen to books on tape, talk, and sing together. They always sing the same German hymn: Geh aus mein Herz und suche Freud—”Go Out, My Heart, and Seek Joy.” And, being professors, they sing their own translation. In fact, Beth and Joe re-translate Geh aus from German into English every single day. And every day, for Joe, as a consequence of his strokes, is a little like starting over from scratch. Five weeks ago, Lambeth House locked down the Memory Care wing. Beth could no longer wheel Joe back to her apartment to begin their daily translation. After three weeks of painful isolation, the facility set up a video chat for the couple. Now, once a day, for twenty minutes, they can talk. What do they talk about? Well, twenty minutes is enough time, Beth reports, to translate a single stanza of their favorite hymn. When they have fi nished translating and singing, Beth repeats three phrases that Joe now calls her litany:

    “I love you.” “I miss you.” “I have not abandoned you.”

    “Do not be afraid;” Jesus said to the women, “Tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.” My friends, today the sanctuary of Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church stands empty. It is empty because, in the face of this pandemic, this is the best way we know to care for each other. I have come to see this temporary emptiness not as something sad, but as something sacred. It is also oddly appropriate. Right? Emptiness marks the start of our most sacred story. On Easter, we celebrate history’s most famous vacancy. We cheer an empty tomb. The source of hope and joy for all humanity is not here. Our resurrected Lord is out there. In Galilee…

    Holding onto the good, strengthening the weak, lending courage to the fainthearted, (which is, I suppose, all of us right now), binding the forces of chaos and death with a simple litany: “I love you. I miss you. I will not abandon you.”


    Page 34

    This, my friends, is the heart of Easter. Even in the hardest of times—especially in the hardest of times—God will not abandon us. Christ will fi nd us. This is the truth that makes the women run, the faithful sing, and, over which even curmudgeons cannot suppress their joy. What do you know? Jesus is on the loose. We affi rm our Easter proclamation, using the words of Scripture from 1 Corinthians 15 and Luke 24:

    This is the good news we have received, in which we stand, and by which we are saved. God has given us a living hope: Christ is risen from the dead! Alleluia. Amen.

    Note This sermon was preached Easter 2020.

  • What Do We Do with All This Grief?

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 32

    What Do We Do with All This Grief?

    Jennifer A. McBride Horan & McConaty Funeral Service/HeartLight Center, Denver, Colorado

    At 2:00 a.m. on April 25, 1992, the phone on my nightstand rang. It was a nurse from the hospital telling me that my father had died. They had been trying to call my mother, but she didn’t answer because she had taken out her hearing aids. So I got dressed and drove to Mom’s townhome, let myself in, and went upstairs to wake her and tell her that her husband had died. She got dressed, and I drove us to see Dad. Seeing death was not something I had experienced before. There was the occasional “wake” for my grandmother’s friends when they died. I remember comments like “Doesn’t she look good!” and thinking all of that was fairly bizarre given the fact that the person was dead. Standing in Dad’s hospital room at 3:30 a.m. with just the fl uorescent light lit over the head of his bed, the stillness and peace I felt as I looked at my father was enormous. Dad was a tremendous fan of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and his words rang in my head: “Free at last. Free at last. Thank God Almighty, I’m free at last.” This was a very unexpected reaction as I had watched a machine breathe every breath for my father for months. Dad had a stroke in the recovery room after a minor surgery and was put on a ventilator for what was to be a few days but turned into almost fi ve months. I went to the hospital to be with him every day when my daughters were in their elementary school classes. I would leave in time to be home for my girls, and my mother would head to the hospital to spend the rest of the day and evening with Dad. We did that for months. We did not know about hospice care at that time, and they kept talking about dad going home after getting off the ventilator. The series of strokes on his brain stem made that possibility impossible. And so I found myself calling a funeral home for the fi rst time in my life. I didn’t even know what you called the person you were going to meet with, the undertaker, the mortician? Old fashioned language to say the least. I ended up calling Bill Logan at Horan & McConaty, a person who would become a friend and colleague, “the funeral guy.” It was the best term I could come up with at the time. Within weeks I found myself overwhelmed by the intensity of grief. Why didn’t anyone ever tell me that grief could feel like this? Did others experience this? Was I the only one who felt like I was a little crazy with the intensity of what I was feeling? I set out to learn as much as I could and read all that I could about grief and loss. One of the best books I found was Praying Our Goodbyes by Joyce Rupp. “The word goodbye—originally “God-be-with-ye” or “Go-with-God”—was a recognition that God was a signifi cant part of the going.”1 Those experiences set my feet on an unexpected path to St. Thomas Theological Seminary in Denver, as I sought to fi gure out what to do with the experience of Dad’s death, the ensuing loss and grief, and my desire to help others. I knew I was not going to be a parish pastor. That was not my calling. I thought that chaplaincy might fi t and perhaps hospital chaplaincy, as there had been some very important hospital chaplains along my journey with Dad. It was through attending a daylong seminar by Dr. Alan Wolfelt from the Center for Loss and Life Transition in Fort Collins that I connected


    Page 33

    with John Horan, whose funeral service company, Horan & McConaty, had cared for my father and for us when he died. That began a connection that brings me to today and this article for you. During my Clinical Pastoral Education (“CPE”) units, I did my internship placement at Horan & McConaty Funeral Service in addition to serving as a hospital chaplain. Following graduation, I served in a Lutheran parish doing pastoral care but came to realize my calling was to be at the funeral home. So 26 years ago, I became director of grief support and community education at Horan & McConaty and also created HeartLight Center, a non-profi t center for grief support in Denver, Colorado (www.heartlightcenter.org). When Dr. Tom Long was close to fi nishing writing Accompany Them with Singing,2 he came to Denver to spend some days with us at the funeral home. Tom spent time with me in my role at the funeral home. We shared many powerful and memorable conversations and experiences. I am not a scholar or a theologian. I am a caregiver to grieving people who fi nd themselves in some of the most diffi cult times in their lives, when they are impacted by the death of someone they love. It is my goal in this article to share some thoughts, observations, and suggestions I have witnessed with the thousands of grieving people I have been honored to connect with over the past 26 years working in funeral service and running a non-profi t grief support center. How do we care for grieving individuals? What do we say from the pulpit? How do we care for ourselves and our colleagues in ministry as we care for others?

    So what is grief and how is it different from mourning? Kenneth Mitchell and Herbert Anderson, in All Our Losses, All Our Griefs, pose this defi nition: “Grief is the normal but bewildering cluster of ordinary human emotions arising in response to a signifi cant loss, intensifi ed and complicated by the relationship to the person or the object lost.”3 Grief is a normal and natural internal response we have when we experience loss and change in our lives. It is certainly most profound when we experience death of someone in our lives. But grief is not limited to when someone we love dies. Our human life is in a constant state of change, in fl ux, and there are many kinds of change that affect us. Here is a list that was compiled by Dr. Pat Del Zoppo from Saint Paul Bereavement Center on Staten Island New York:

    List of Some Losses and Causes of Grief Death of a loved one, Miscarriage, Separation, Abortion, Divorce, Position, Pets, Title, Things, Just leaving, Fire, Theft, Misplacement, Argument, Graduating, Distance, Tasks, Skills, Family changes, Elections, Aging, Heritage, Roots, Reputation, Culture, Leadership, Job/Career, Retiring, Success, Changing, Failure, Promotion, Change, Demotion, Challenge, Closing out, Co-workers, Fertility, Location (moving), Beauty, Identity, Responsibility, Terminal illness, Goals, Faculties, Dreams, Vision, Time, Speech, Structure, Taste, Freedom, Sexuality, Independence, Bodily controls , Country, Surgery, Money, Body parts, Teeth, Growing up, Projects, Marriages, Teachers, Births, Beliefs, Values, Leaders, Self-esteem, Schools, Youth, Lifestyle, Childhood, Faith, Health, Control, Toys, Hair, Choices, Appearance, Energy, Stamina, Trust.


    Page 34

    Pat Del Zoppo posed an excellent question which I think is an important lens to hold up as we seek to care for a grieving person: “What does this loss mean to this person at this time in his or her life?” The list above might strike very different reactions in different people. What makes sense to you on that list? Are there things you have seen others react to in surprising or puzzling ways? I remember sharing this list with family members who had someone in a long-term care facility. One woman immediately blurted out “taste!” I inquired why. She said a medication she was taking meant that she lost her sense of taste and that therefore eating had no pleasure for her. Dining with others did not have the same feeling when everything tasted like cardboard. Mourning, on the other, is, as Alan Wolfelt describes it, “grief gone public.” The shared mourning experience is the communal experience and expression of our grief. So many people were grieving losses during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic and did not have any opportunity or way to come together to mourn with others. Churches were essentially closed for services, bars and restaurants were closed, and people were discouraged from meeting with others during the initial “lock-down” stages in most of the country. Funeral services in many jurisdictions were limited to 10 people. Those who experienced virtual streaming services were offered some opportunity for connection, but these were a poor second to the hugs, handshakes, and shared meals of the times before the pandemic. We spent a lot of time helping people to understand that they could have multiple ceremonies, some smaller ones at fi rst, with the promise of larger and more fulfi lling ones to come in the days ahead.

    Caring for your Community How do you care for grieving people in your congregation? What do you say one-on-one or within a small group? Remember when we were growing up and were told “Don’t just stand there. Do something!” Sometimes the best thing we can do in being with grieving people is to do the opposite, “Don’t do something, just stand (or sit) there.” Hold the space. Sit in the silence. Be there without needing to fi ll it. Seek to be a non-anxious presence in what can be an anxious situation. When we’ve done sessions at HeartLight Center for Grief Support and Education about “What not to say to grieving people,” at the top of the list are what Joyce Rupp calls “one-liners .”4 These are phrases like “God would not ever give you any more than you could handle,” “God must have wanted another fl ower for his garden,” “She is in a better place,” “He’s not suffering any longer.” I have described the experience of walking along with someone grieving as a “sacred trust.” People amaze me by putting their heart in my hands when they feel most vulnerable. In those moments we are invited into some very intimate places where people are raw, open, and undefended. It is an enormous responsibility and an enormous privilege. I remember standing outside a state room in the funeral home early in my career as a family group was inside seeing one of their family members who had ended his life. My fervent prayer at that moment was for God to keep me enough out of the way that I did not say or do anything that might be hurtful or harmful to them. I could only imagine the pain they were experiencing. I could not know their pain, as I have not had personal experience of that kind of death. But I could and did seek to be a non-anxious presence in a time of great anxiety, questions, and crushing sadness.


    Page 35

    In his outstanding book, The Undertaking, funeral director and poet Thomas Lynch describes a powerful moment when a grieving mother educated a well-meaning clergy member about terminology like referring to the body of a deceased person as “just a shell.” Lynch says, “I once saw an Episcopalian deacon nearly decked by the swift slap of the mother of a teenager, dead of leukemia, to whom he’d tendered this counsel: ‘I’ll tell you when it’s just a shell.’ The woman said, ‘For now and until I tell you otherwise, she’s my daughter.’” She was asserting the longstanding right of the living to declare the dead dead. Just as we declare the living alive through baptisms and lovers in love by nuptials, funerals are the way we close the gap between the death that happens and the death that matters.”5

    Hold the Space As part of a biblical study program in which I participated many years ago, we had to have a memory verse each term. The instructor would not allow John 11:35, “Jesus wept.” At the death of Lazarus, Jesus reacted as a human being. He didn’t say “Lazarus is in a better place.” He did what many caring, emotionally based human beings would do. He wept. Why should/would we hold ourselves to a different standard than that as His representative within our congregations. I had the honor of facilitating a grief support group where we talked about the two-sided coin of sorrow and solace. Just as we grieve because we have loved, the fact that we can have the opportunity to express the deep sorrow we can experience after the death of someone loved, we also open ourselves to the gift of solace that can come from others or from within ourselves. The grieving people who were part of the group would tell you that when they attempted to express their sorrow to others outside the group, they were met with anxiety and reassurances that it will “get better with time.” Their need to express their sorrow was short-circuited by the discomfort of others. Solace is soothing, comforting, and affi rming. Solace can come from people around us, from nature, from the sensory beauty of music, art, food that nourishes our souls, as well as solace that can come from within, such as memories. One of the group participants spoke powerfully about “needing to sit in the sorrow in order to come to any semblance of peace with it.” Where there is a trusting relationship, there can be permission to uncover the wound. They also observed that when we console someone (or offer them solace), we must ourselves be open to the pain. As each person shared the experience of sorrow and solace that evening, we literally passed a large coin as people took turns sharing. A woman talked about how all she had been able to feel was the deep sorrow in missing her husband, how she could not remember him healthy, how she longed for his touch and physical presence. The evening before the group, she had been sobbing in her home when she suddenly reconnected with the music she had playing in the background. At once, she had a strong memory of how it felt when they danced together, how she remembered being in his arms, and the joy of feeling so loved and cherished. When we take sorrow seriously, we can invite solace into the conversation. Judith Skretney’s “Top Seven Things to Know About Grief” lists the factors that can impact people’s reactions to grief. This list has always been important for me to remember as I strive to help grieving people.


    Page 36

    Top Seven Things to Know About Grief: 1. Grief lasts longer and can be more painful than most people expect. 2. There is no right way or wrong way to grieve—just your way. 3. The least helpful thing for grieving people is other people telling them how they should be doing things. 4. The most helpful thing for grieving people is to be able to process their feelings (talking, writing, composing, creating). 5. Good grief doesn’t mean forgetting; it means remembering and forming a new relationship with the deceased person. 6. Sometimes the people we think should help us simply can’t. 7. People are fundamentally resilient. They can and they will survive. We can empower people.

    My eighth point is that having faith does not preclude you from experiencing the process of grief. It means you have a relationship with God to lean onto, or lean into, as you process loss. Variables that Infl uence Grief by Judiith Skretny: • The bereaved person’s unique relationship with the deceased (strength of attachment ) • Degree of ambivalence or unfinished business • Circumstances of the death (sudden or unexpected; violent or peaceful; age of deceased) • Personality and coping behaviors of the bereaved person (previous history of loss; ability to express emotions and seek/receive help) • Social support (family; friends) • Cultural and religious support (belief system; rituals) • Health and lifestyle of the bereaved person (history of mental illness; depression; substance abuse) It can be helpful for people to understand that they can experience grief in mind, body, and spirit. They might feel out of breath or their heart may literally ache. All of who we are experiences grief and loss.

    What do you say from the pulpit? It is so important to remember that for every happy occasion we celebrate and lift up in our prayer during a service, there is someone in one of the pews who is having a very different experience from others due to loss that is impacting his or her lives. When I served at all Saints Lutheran Church in Aurora, Colorado, I often wrote and offered the “Prayers of the People.” And even while giving thanks and celebrating all the mothers on Mother’s Day, it was always important to talk about those who are missing their mothers on Mother’s Day, some because of death and some because of broken or strained relationships. When you are giving your sermon, how many people in your congregation may be grieving from the loss of a job, a dear friend moving away, realizing their spouse is having an affair, their favorite supervisor or other work colleagues losing their jobs or being transferred or promoted, or worried about a health challenge? What can you say that will help them better cope with their grief and to know that you understand? Scriptures can both heal and hurt.


    Page 37

    The importance of ritual and ceremony How can we support people to help them integrate these changes into their lives? William Worden has explained the “Tasks of Mourning” or work of grief: confront the reality of the loss, express the feelings, fi nd meaning, integrate the loss into your life. Joyce Rupp explains the 4 ways to “pray a goodbye:” recognition, refl ection, ritualization and reorientation.6 We need rituals and the opportunities to grieve and mourn more than ever before in the midst of COVID-19 and the tremendous aftermath of the “pandemic of grief” that we will be dealing with for a very long time. We have seen many different and unique ways of including people in funeral services. The technology that we employ these days allows far more people to “attend ” services through online links that can be listed in obituaries, church websites, through social media, and we can invite people from all around the country and all around the world to participate in these essential rituals of honoring and leave-taking . Online guestbooks where people can leave condolences or share memories are more treasured by grieving family members than ever before. Handwritten cards, notes, and letters are cherished gifts when mourners can feel more isolated than they normally would were we able to gather in person. Take a moment during a service where everyone who is participating lights a candle at the same time to represent the light that the person who died still burns within each of them and in the world forever. Invite all who participate in a virtual gathering to go and do something meaningful in honor and in memory of something that was important to the person who died, and then share that experience with the family of that person. One pastor felt so sad at the thought of empty pews and invited all who wished to care for the family to send fl owers in the deceased person’s favorite color. Each row had jars of yellow fl owers with names of those who were “present” in a different way, along with words of sympathy and love. The chapel full of yellow fl owers was breathtaking and a powerful representation for the family of the love and presence of those who were with them in spirit. People can participate in many different ways by sending a video of themselves sharing memories, playing or singing a favorite hymn, reading a poem or scripture. A young man who took his own life was a student at the local high school. I was asked to come to the school to meet with what I thought would be a handful of his friends. When I got to the school, there were hundreds of students and parents. I had brought many handouts to share but was surprised at the crowd. Before heading to the front of the room, I put my hand into my purse for a tissue and was poked by a small metal Mason’s trowel inscribed “Spread the cement of love today.” This was the message I needed to share, not a big message that needed to be shared, but bringing a loving presence was what the community needed to gather around.

    Self-care for clergy As a member of the clergy, do you fi nd yourself stifl ed in helping grieving people by the models you have been taught and by being burned out by being confronted with so much loss? Do you feel empty or frustrated that you have not helped or consoled the grieving person you have just spent an hour visiting? Even the most seasoned clergy struggle with the challenges they face daily helping their fl ock navigate the challenges and tragedies of life. What refi lls your reservoir? Connections with family and friends? Finding and


    Page 38

    honoring your own Sabbath time? Hobbies? Is there a trusted colleague with whom you can share with confi dentiality and non-judgment? Find people who understand both the honor and the challenge of the places we are called into to walk with people. Find ways to process some of the troublesome memories we carry so we don’t burden our family members. Our funeral service company cared for seven of those who died at Columbine High School and seven of those killed in the Aurora Theatre shooting. We needed outside people to help our staff family process those experiences. There’s nothing in us we can disconnect from as we walk in painful and sometimes shocking experiences with others. Don’t downplay what you might carry in your memory and heart. Compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are normal and natural parts of this work. The good news is having a caring heart, and the hard thing, at times, is having a caring heart. Please care for your own heart as you care for others. Mitchell and Anderson write:

    If it is human to suffer, then the principal theological question when we are confronted by loss and grief is not why do we suffer? but who suffers with us? Freedom from suffering is a blindness. The willingness to bear another’s suffering in human life is the reality of suffering in human life and the acceptance that the grieving person and his or her circumstances are normal. To be a follower of the crucifi ed Lord is to be a bearer of sorrow. For that reason, the Christian is always an alien in a world determined to deny death, to cover over loss and grief, and to ignore or stifl e those who grieve. It is our ability to suffer with one another that modifi es the loneliness of grief and eventually brings some closure to our sadness. The Christian’s capacity to feel the pain of others transcends apathy and alienation. But in the last analysis, it is the assurance that God suffers with us that is the rock on which we stand in the turbulence of grief.7

    Notes 1 Joyce Rupp, Praying our Goodbyes (Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press, 1988, 2009), 1. 2 Thomas G. Long, Accompany Them with Singing—The Christian Funeral (Louisvillle, KY: Westl l minster John Knox Press, 2013). 3 Kenneth R. Mitchell and Herbert Anderson, All our Losses, All Our Griefs (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press 1983), 54. 4 Rupp, Praying Our Goodbyes, 26. 5 Thomas Lynch, The Undertaking (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009), 20. 6 Rupp, Praying Our Goodbyes, 60. 7 Mitchell and Anderson, All our Losses, All Our Griefs, 169.

  • Toward a Theology of Suffering

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 24

    Toward a Theology of Suffering

    Trace Haythorn Association for Clinical Pastoral Education, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

    Introduction: A Story of Intersections As I write this essay, I begin with a sense of being utterly overwhelmed. First, I am writing in September 2020. The headlines are full of stories of human suffering . COVID-19. One million deaths globally. Black Lives Matter. White supremacy. George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Aubrey, so many others. Climate change. Hurricanes. Windstorms. Wildfi res. Pathological political divisiveness. Global distrust . Rising authoritarianism. The deaths of John Lewis and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Debates about how schools can reopen. Iraq. Afghanistan. The opioid epidemic. And I haven’t even begun to name my personal issues, the things that don’t capture the attention of the press and yet weigh upon my heart and mind as powerfully as any of these other issues. It is just so hard. I am also profoundly aware that (1) I am not a theologian, and (2) it is arguable that more ink has been used to try and craft a theology of suffering than any other core tenet within the Christian tradition. What I do here may be viewed as a classic man-splaining exercise, where I assume the role of Cliff Claven (of “Cheers” fame) and pontifi cate in a manner that ultimately reveals my ignorance. I am certain we don’t need another essay that tells us how to think about suffering. (I read several in preparing this piece.) On the other hand, I take some comfort in the fact that no theologian has suffi ciently addressed the question of suffering, thus I join my sisters and brothers from across the centuries in an effort to speak into the mystery of human suffering, provide something helpful, something that just might reduce the suffering of others. I come, as well, as one who has served with hundreds of chaplains and clinical pastoral education (CPE) educators who have found themselves rethinking the core of their practice, their understanding of pastoral presence. They, along with their congregational colleagues, have had to reimagine rituals for dying, death, and grief. They have pivoted from primarily caring for patients and their families to caring much more intentionally for staff, since patients have been isolated, family visits eliminated, and staff working exhausting schedules, overwhelmed by grief and fatigue as they strive to stay ahead of the virus. In a sermon on Luke 21: 20-28, Barbara Brown Taylor writes, “The rules do not change in frightening times; they just get clearer. The proper response to disaster is to keep loving God and our neighbors as ourselves. The proper posture is to raise our heads….Either way, our calling is…to assist God in the deliverance of the world any and every way we can.”1 In our hospitals and hospice contexts, this has been the work of chaplains, physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, environmental service workers, and healthcare administrators in the midst of the pandemic. In our streets and neighborhoods, it has been the work of those who have marched and borne witness to racial injustice in the face of the senseless killing of African American brothers and sisters. In our communities, it has been the work of congregational leaders who, in ordinary times having so great a value on gathering together, have adapted to video,


    Page 25

    drive by, and parking lot approaches to worship and spiritual care. In our daily lives, it is the invitation to each one of us as we strap on a mask for yet another day, check on a neighbor who lives alone whom we have not seen, or resist the temptations to embrace the latest conspiracy theory simply so we have a place to project our suffering and direct our anger. Deliver us, O God, even here, even now.

    What Is Suffering? So where does one begin? Any theology of suffering cannot be suffi ciently explanatory ; it must be exploratory. What I mean by this is simply that none of us can offer a fully satisfying rationale for why we suffer or why suffering exists. We have many beliefs and experiences of it, but if we were certain as to its purposes, there would be no need for this essay or any of the other efforts that have been offered through the years. There are two claims we can make as we begin this effort. First, suffering is ubiquitous. Every human being suffers. “[Suffering] is composed of the roots sub, meaning ‘under,’ and ferre, meaning ‘to carry, bear.’ Thus suffering is what we carry, what we bear, and what we labor under. The experience of suffering is universal.”2 Whether physically, emotionally, socially, or spiritually—and sometimes in all four domains—suffering is a part of human life. It cannot be escaped or simply ignored. It is something we all come to know in one way or another. We know it throughout our lives. From the earliest experiences of pain and separation to the cumulative experiences of older adulthood, suffering is with us throughout life’s journey. The source of suffering is pain. Physical suffering is self-explanatory: the process of experiencing physical pain. Emotional pain (also known as psychological pain) “runs on the same neural tracks as physical pain,”3 though the source of pain is not from a physical source but rather psychological. Depression, grief, rejection, alienation, addiction, and many other forms of psychological distress or illness may lead to emotional suffering. While often inclusive of many forms of psychological suffering, “[s]ocial suffering results from what political, economic, and institutional power does to people and, reciprocally, from how these forms of power themselves infl uence responses to social problems.”4 Spiritual suffering (also referred to as spiritual pain or spiritual struggle) occurs when “some aspect of [religious/spiritual] belief, practice, or experience becomes a focus of negative thoughts or emotions, concern or confl ict.”5 And yet—and this is the second point—no matter how similar the circumstances, consequences, implications, or variables, no individual experience of suffering is quite like another. There is a kind of particularity that is embodied within each of us. We can have empathy for the suffering of others, but we can never fully enter their experience because we cannot bring to bear all that they have known up to that moment. Thus, our suffering is never just about the moment itself, but it must be understood as the complex interweaving of a lifetime of experiences (no matter how young or old) that inform the pain we know right here, right now. It is not just an experience of our thoughts or our feelings; it is fully embodied, from our head to our toes.

    Making Meaning of Suffering The journey with suffering often begins with questions. Peter Trachetenberg in The Book of Calamaties: Five Questions about Suffering and Its Meaning explores


    Page 26

    suffering both philosophically and experientially. Questions invite exploration as opposed to explanation. Each one is its own quest, a journey of discovery, a trek seeking insight, understanding, or solace. (Note: every question has the potential to launch a “quest.”) His questions are as follows: • Why me? • How do I endure? • What is just? • What does my suffering say about me? And what does it say about God? • What do I owe those who suffer? He writes, “Suffering is as common as death, and like death, it resists all attempts to explain it. Perhaps it is worse than death. We long for the dead to speak to us, but who wants to hear the suffering, even when they return, as they sometimes do, from the land of pain? Who wants to know what they know?”6 We can hear in his questions the old trope, “There but for the grace of God go I.” These questions Trachetenberg raises invite a move towards integration, a shift from simply enduring pain to crafting what the pain means for our life. For many years, David Kessler worked with Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, exploring the processes of grief. Recently, his research has led him to argue that there are not five but six stages. The sixth stage is what he describes as “meaning.” He writes, “It is in your control to find meaning every day. You can still love, laugh, grow, pray, smile, cry, live, give, be grateful, be present. You can take the other moments as they come. That can be the meaning. In the end, no matter how hard it is, if we allow ourselves to spend time searching for the meaning in our loss, it will appear because of our search and the healing will happen.”7 The same may be true of suffering. Meaningless suffering may be simply unbearable . Again, speaking of grief, Kessler writes,

    The mind can be cruel in grief. Concentration camp survivors often talk about the horrifi c situations they had to endure. The physical suffering was unbearable. But they also talk about the internal suffering they experienced when they were unable to picture a future. The torture of not knowing when they would get out, if ever, was even worse than their other tortures. The thought of a future without a release date deprived them of any sense of purpose and condemned them to the horrors of the present. But as long as you are alive you have a future, and the promise of release from your current pain.8

    Etty Hillesum offers a powerful example of Kessler’s argument. Etty lived in Rotterdam, Holland, in the 1940s. A young Jewish woman, she kept a journal where, on July 3, 1942, she wrote:

    What they (the Nazis) are after is our total destruction. I accept it. I know it now and I shall not burden others with my fears. I shall not be bitter if others fail to grasp what is happening to us Jews. I work and continue to live with the same conviction, and I fi nd life meaningful—yes, meaningful —although I hardly dare say so in company these days. Living and dying, sorrow and joy, the blisters on my feet and the jasmine behind the


    Page 27

    house, the persecution, the unspeakable horrors—it is all as one in me, and I accept it all as one mighty whole….9

    Nine days later, she wrote directly to God, revealing not only a deep theological grounding but also her own resolution to the problem of human suffering in the realm of an all-loving God:

    I shall try to help You, God, to stop my strength ebbing away, though I cannot vouch for it in advance. But one thing is becoming increasingly clear to me: that You cannot help us, that we must help You to help ourselves. And that is all we can manage these days and also all that really matters: that we safeguard that little piece of You, God, in ourselves. And perhaps in others as well. Alas, there doesn’t seem to be much You Yourself can do about our circumstances, about our lives. Neither do I hold You responsible. You cannot help us, but we must help You and defend Your dwelling place inside us to the last.10

    Theological Meanings of Suffering In her 2003 article “Facing Evil: Evil’s Many Faces,” Susan Nelson argues evil and suffering are interrelated: “Evil is an awareness of this disjuncture between the pronouncement that life is God’s good creation and the knowledge that suffering and violence are real and threaten not only life and health but also any sense of meaning, order, and blessing. Evil is the experience of suffering, misery, death, and the accompanying fear that such suffering undermines any hope of meaning and order in the world or of a God who exercises providential care.”11 She provides fi ve theological paradigms that she identifi es from within the Christian tradition that are intended to provide people of faith with responses to evil in their lives and the world:

    1. A moral view, i.e., evil is the consequence of human sin; 2. Radical suffering, i.e., suffering is utterly meaningless and can only be endured; 3. Ambiguous creation, i.e., sin, evil, and pain are a part of creation and thus suffering is its consequence; 4. Eschatological imagination, i.e., while radical suffering exists, it is our moral obligation to resist it and in so doing to strive to bring about God’s reign; 5. Redemptive suffering, i.e., some suffering can be engaged to bring about redemption: personal, communal, societal, etc.

    Nelson notes that these views may overlap and inform one another in the meaning -making process. In my experience, it is often the kind of suffering—physical, emotional, social, or spiritual—that may lead one to one frame as opposed to another .12 Barbara Brown Taylor highlights how distinctive the Christian approach to suffering is among other faith traditions: “Christianity is the only world religion that confesses a God who suffers. It is not all that popular an idea, even among Christians.


    Page 28

    We prefer a God who prevents suffering, only that is not the God we have got. What the cross teaches us is that God’s power is not the power to force human choices and end human pain. It is, instead, the power to pick up the shattered pieces and make something holy of them—not from a distance but right up close.”13 For Christians, it is a mistake, however, if we seek to understand suffering and God suffering with us solely through Jesus’ fi nal hours and death on the cross. The gospels offer us dozens of invitations to fi nd communion with Jesus, his family, the disciples, the leaders, his opponents, and so many others in the larger narrative of his life. Why else did an angel need to visit Mary, Elizabeth, Joseph, and Zechariah if not to ease their suffering as they faced the news of births beyond explanation and all that they might portend? What about Mary Magdalene, Zaccheus, Jairus and his daughter, Lazarus, Mary, and Martha? Didn’t they know something about suffering, and didn’t Jesus meet them in the midst of it? What about those unnamed sufferers who came to Jesus seeking healing? Didn’t they fi nd not just a new wholeness through their encounter with Jesus but also the kind of communion that transformed all that they knew? All of these experiences inform what becomes the passion week. The suffering of the community that Jesus loves cannot be separated from his suffering and those of his community, even unto the cross.

    Towards a Theology of Suffering or Hope? In her masterful work Suffering, Dorothee Soelle argues there are two two-part questions Christians must ask about suffering: “Question one is: ‘What are the causes of suffering, and how can these conditions be eliminated?’ It is related to question two: ‘What is the meaning of suffering and under what conditions can it make us more human?’”14 I’ve attempted to address the first three parts of these questions, and I would like to conclude by exploring the final phrase: under what conditions can suffering make us more human? First, suffering solely for the sake of suffering is not wise or warranted. Mukherjee writes, “Into every life some suffering must come. It is an essential feature of being human. What we can choose, though, is how we relate to that suffering….It is up to us whether we suffer neurotically or, using Jung’s terminology, ‘legitimately.’”15 In other words, we will know pain—physical, emotional, social, and/or spiritual. How we choose to respond makes all the difference. When I think back to 2019 and all of the plans, initiatives, and marketing efforts that used phrases celebrating 2020 as a time of clear vision, I cannot help but feel deep sadness by how disorienting the last year has been. We have experienced the full range of responses to suffering in our country and our world: from silent withdrawal to public protest, from glimpses of solidarity and support to deep divisiveness and hostility. Canadian Actress Julie Nolke created a video series where her future self shares with her present self what is coming, with a mix of profane humor and profound grief.16 We laugh, not because what she shares is necessarily funny, but because we stand with her in a state of incredulity at where we are and fear of what is to come. We laugh at the absurdity of it all, even as we strive for means of coping within it. Perhaps finding sources of laughter we can come together to remind one another that the cumulative pain of 2020 will not define us, that we are committed to Life. Second, while suffering may lead one to want to withdraw, the journey towards meaning-making is often a sojourn with others. Even Job was accompanied by his


    Page 29

    misguided friends. When we reach our most painful moments, sharing the story of that experience is often the first step in the meaning-making process. Taylor writes, “There is a strange kind of comfort in a story that tells the absolute truth about how bad things can get—that spares no details and takes no prisoners. You can trust a story like that a whole lot better than you can trust one that has been all prettied up. Plus, the very fact that someone is telling it means you are not alone. Someone else has been there. Someone else knows what it is like, and that company—that communion —can make all the difference.”17 Kessler agrees, noting that there are times in intense pain where we need to “set down the mirror and pick up the binoculars.”18 Even though no one will have quite the same experience, the world of suffering is inhabited by us all, and we can accompany one another in the quest towards a new sense of peace. Of course, the pandemic has required so many to be together apart. Quarantine and isolation have meant we cannot practice presence in the ways that are considered best practice, a condition that creates a particular kind of suffering. This has been especially true for chaplains, pastors, and spiritual care professionals. “We run towards suffering,” said the Rev. Amani Legagneur, manager of spiritual health and education for the Northside Hospital System. “We want to be there, regardless of how painful what we encounter may be. We’re not averse to really difficult challenges.” But in these times, we can’t, both for the safety of others and for our own. “We had to step back and look at this strategically. It was more ethical not to be present so as not to bring the battle to the nurses, the doctors, and other patients by possibly being vectors for this disease.”19 In this moment, spiritual care givers have demonstrated a remarkable nimbleness, adapting what was seen as best practice to use whatever they could—iPads, grease pencils on windows, posters, even good old land lines—to help people hear voices of support, to see faces that reminded them that they are not alone. Third, the Lenten Season offers an opportunity to hold suffering, to let it be present in ways that much of the year ignores, avoids, or rejects it. This holding is not wallowing; it is a courageous step into the pain that lies at its source, buoyed by a transcendent hope that provides a light to follow in this dark night of the soul. The Lenten journey invites us onto that path described by Paul in Romans 5, the one where suffering produces endurance, endurance produces character, character produces hope, and hope does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that has been given to us. I can imagine a sermon series that addresses each of these terms, proceeding towards Easter with its witness to the resurrection, perhaps the most profound hope we can know. In this moment, more than anything else, I simply want and need reassurance that there is an end to the COVID-19 pandemic, that we can build a society where racial equity is a norm instead of an exception, where even when we disagree fiercely with one another, we commit to constructive dialogue, seeking answers that are committed to the common good. And while scripture grounds my faith, it is in music that I find solace, that I find not only a theology of suffering but also a promise that suffering does not have the last word. Carrie Newcomer’s song, “You Can Do This Hard Thing,” has become the anthem many of us have turned to with its reassurance and invitation to resilience:


    Page 30

    There at the table With my head in my hands, A column of numbers I just could not understand. You said,” Add these together, Carry the two, Now you.”

    You can do this hard thing. You can do this hard thing. It’s not easy I know, But I believe that it’s so. You can do this hard thing.

    At a cold winter station, Breathing into our gloves, This would change me forever. Leaving for God knows what, You carried my bags. You said, I’ll wait For you.”

    You can do this hard thing. You can do this hard thing. It’s not easy I know, But I believe that it’s so. You can do this hard thing.

    Late at night I called, And you answered the phone. The worst it had happened, And I did not want to be alone. You quietly listened, You said, “We’ll see this thru.”

    You can do this hard thing. You can do this hard thing. It’s not easy I know, But I believe that it’s so.20

    No theology of suffering is complete without this reminder: you can do this hard thing. Thanks be to God.

    Notes 1 Barbara Brown Taylor, God in Pain: Teaching Sermons on Suffering (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998), 85. 2 Sushmita Mukherjee, “Sitting with Suffering: A Task for Spiritual Companions,” Presence: An Inter-


    Page 31

    national Journal of Spiritual Direction 26, no. 2 (2020), 26. 3 N. I. Eisenberger, “Does Rejection Hurt? An FMRI Study of Social Exclusion,” Science 302, no. 5643 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134, 292. 4 Veena Das, Arthur Kleinman, and Margaret M. Lock, Social Suffering (Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press, 2010), ix. 5 Julie J. Exline, et al., “The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale: Development and Initial Validation,” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6, no. 3 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036465, 208. 6 Peter Trachtenberg, The Book of Calamities: Five Questions about Suffering and Its Meaning (New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company, 2008), 415. 7 David Kessler, Finding Meaning: the Sixth Stage of Grief (New York, NY: SCRIBNER, 2020), 111. f 8 Ibid., 70. 9 Stephanie Kroner, “Etty Hillesum, ‘Life Is Beautiful, In Spite of Everything,’” Unitarian Universalist Church of Berkeley, November 3, 2015, https://uucb.org/etty-hillesum-life-is-beautiful-in-spite-ofeverything /. 10 Ibid. 11 Susan L. Nelson, “Facing Evil: Evil’s Many Faces,” Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57, no. 4 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1177/002096430005700405, 399. 12 Ibid. 13 Taylor, God in Pain, 118. 14 Dorothee Soelle, Suffering: translated by Everett R. Kalin (Philadelphia: Fortess Press, 1975), Kindle Edition, Locations 63-64. 15 Mukherjee, “Sitting with Suffering,” 26. 16 Julie Nolke, “Explaining the Pandemic to My Future Self” (YouTube), accessed September 28, 2020, https://youtu.be/Ms7capx4Cb8. 17 Taylor, God in Pain, 107. 18 Kessler, Finding Meaning, 74. 19 Sheila Poole, “Hospital Chaplains Adjust to the New Normal with COVID-19,” Atlanta Journal Constitution, April 26, 2020, https://www.ajc.com/news/local/hospital-chaplains-adjust-the-new-normal -with-covid/t3eE85ubTiMpOtaj9xcCZP/). 20 Carrie Newcomer, “Lyrics,” Carrie Newcomer, 2016, https://www.carrienewcomer.com/lyrics, “The Beautiful Not Yet.”

  • Praying the Lord’s Prayer in a Pandemic

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 34

    Praying the Lord’s Prayer in a Pandemic

    Will Willimon

    Duke Divinity School, Durham, North Carolina

    Lots of people who haven’t prayed in a long time have been praying during these days: “Lord, give us a reliable vaccine…and a good logistical network for distribution …and a President who listens to science.” You’d think Christ would say, “Good to hear from you. We’ve been out of touch for awhile.” No, even the anguished, heartfelt cry isn’t good enough for Jesus.1 Paul says, “We don’t know how to pray” (Romans 8:26), but not because Jesus didn’t try to teach us. Lamenting the things Christians can’t do in a pandemic – congregate , choral music, hugs – a pastor said to his people, “At least you can pray. Everybody can do that.” Not so fast. In an age in which “You’ll be in my thoughts and prayers” is the equivalent of “Have a nice day,” it’s good to be reminded by Jesus that prayer in his name doesn’t come naturally. Spilling your guts, enumerating your wounds, delivering your wish list: heck, even the Gentiles do that. The listening and the speaking required for colloquy with the Trinity is hard. Indoctrination is required. Fortunately, Jesus says, “When you pray, say….” Dietrich Bonhoeffer says it is a “dangerous error” to think that “the heart prays by itself.”2 “Prayer does not mean simply [to] pour out one’s heart. It means rather to fi nd a way to God,” which doesn’t come naturally and “cannot be done alone.”3 “The richness of the Word of God ought to determine our prayer, not poverty of our heart.”4 Christian prayer is governed by the chief partner in divine-human communication. Observing Jesus in prayer, his disciples asked, “Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples” (Luke 11:1). Say what you will about the ineptitude of these yokels, but in asking for instruction, they knew their incompetence. In Matthew’s account of this conversation, Jesus implies that the prayers of Gentiles (that is, all of us), prayers in the name of Venus, Mars, or Caesar are “a flood of empty words” (Matthew 6:7). The words with which we address God come only from the One whom we address. Rather than trust the words that might come to them by their own devices, Jesus commanded his disciples,

    Pray like this: Our Father who is in heaven, uphold the holiness of your name. Bring in your kingdom so that your will is done on earth as it’s done in heaven. Give us the bread we need for today. Forgive us for the ways we have wronged you, just as we also forgive those who have wronged us. And don’t lead us into temptation, but rescue us from the evil one. (Matthew 6: 7-13, CEB)


    Page 35

    Our. In insisting that we begin with “Our Father” rather than “My God,” Jesus coaxes us into intimate community with God and one another, confronting our selfcenteredness and all-consuming self-interest and rebukes attempts to talk to God privately through soliloquy. “We’re all in this together” was a slogan in the early days of the pandemic. Then came the statistics of the deaths from COVID-19 saying, “No we’re not.” A beleaguered public health offi cial said, “Rather than appeal to people’s sense of the public good, we should have built on their look-out-for-number-one, survival-of-the-fi ttest instincts.” Pastors like Robert Jeffress asserted that his church’s freedom to worship trumped (literally) responsibility to protect others, at the moment his county led the surge.5 The Constitution gives me the right to say “To hell with others I might infect.” The Christmas choir concert is defended as pious exercise of freedom of religion.As every pastor knows, illness (or the threat of it) tends to make narcissists of everybody. To pray “Our Father” is to take responsibility for someone other than friends and family, no small feat in a time when sickness engenders fear that accentuates self-concern. By opening with “Our,” Jesus rescues us from our reduction of the Christian faith into the personal, subjective, and private and thrusts us (whether we like it or not) into the communal and ecclesial, making our prayer a means of loving our neighbor and of being dependent upon the prayer of our neighbor. As we move through Jesus’ prayer, we shall fi nd that conversations with this God quickly become diffi cult. Better get some friends to back you up when you “pray like this.” These months of isolation we’ve proved that Christianity is inextricably social, communal. Online worship is a pale imitation of the real thing, though we have found it helpful to tune into the services at the National Cathedral. You think I’d pray for Donald if not coerced by Anglicans? Public prayer, joining our voice with those of the saints living and dead, helps us to pray more truthfully as we are corrected, held accountable to Scripture and the lives of the Saints. “Our,” when prayed in this pandemic, reminds us of our need for one another, of how tethered my life is to a whole host of planned route drivers, caregivers, and hospital workers who don’t even know me yet daily risk their lives for me. Father. Jesus’ prayer opens not with assessment of our need but with address, acclamation. We are given a personal name whereby we can call upon God on a first name basis, “Abba,” calling God by the same name Jesus calls upon God. The substance of the prayer is determined not by the crisis of a pandemic but by the attributes of the God we’ve got. We preachers have no special insight into the meaning of the pandemic; all we’ve got is the truth about God, a name above all other names, good news about the God who is. We are not abandoned to pray “Our federal government in whom we trust…,” or “Dear advanced medical technology which art our only salvation….” Who is in heaven. God has not settled in down here nor is God the patron of those within our national boundaries. Reality is more than what we have in front of our eyes. The U.S.A. is neither the Kingdom of Heaven nor is the designation “Christian” the equivalent of a thinking, caring, progressive American. If God is in heaven and we’re not, it may be possible that God has larger concerns than our pandemic. Sometimes we can’t tell the difference between these competing realms until something


    Page 36

    like a pandemic hits. Last January we were basically good people who were making postmillennial progress onward and upward. Then came the pandemic, along with the murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and on and on, and the mask was ripped off.6 Nice try, everybody who wrote sappy articles on the salubriousness of isolation and the joys of sitting in solitude in the back yard, having time to play with the kids, and walking as a spiritual practice. Wait in line for three hours for a COVID test or a bag of groceries; then you may extol the joys of bourgeois pandemic solitude. Though a pandemic is incapable of teaching us anything, the eyes of faith see a pandemic as an apocalyptic ending, a gruesome spectacle. The body counts on the nightly news, the countless deaths of family businesses. The United Methodist Church suffers fi nancial calamity and the loss of hundreds of congregations, a virus accomplishing that which the breakaway WCA couldn’t do through General Conference political maneuvering. At the same time, this year has been an apocalyptic revealing of truth that we had heretofore ignored. United we are not nor are we in control. Black, brown lives matter less than white lives when it comes to health care and economic fl ourishing. The gap between the performance of my 401(k) and the hourly wage of a nurse has never been greater. Gratitude for fi rst responders does not extend to foregoing Christmas with the relatives. Health care workers are expected heroically to rectify our dumb decisions and bad behavior. If our human frailty and fragility has been unmasked, then we preachers do well to take note and to work that to our homiletical advantage. It’s always advantageous to know the truth. What truth has been more feared or avoided by us than the truth of our mortality? “In just a few weeks, that damn virus has destroyed lots of sermons that I preached last year,” a preacher in Texas said to me; “I’m not proud of it, but I actually began 2020 with a series on ‘How to Find Joy in Your Marriage.’ By March, I was preaching ‘You’re Gonna Die; Deal with It.’” In the fi rst two months of 2020, our prayer was “Thank you Lord for enabling us to be competent and self-suffi cient, backed up by the world’s largest defense budget and a perking economy, the closest thing to heaven we’ll ever know.” By Lent we prayed, “God in heaven, come down and save us!” Uphold the holiness of your name. Bring in your kingdom so that your will is done on earth as it’s done in heaven. Careful. Beware of praying for God to stir and defend God’s name against counter-renditions of reality. To pray “Thy will be done” To T is to give God permission to go ahead and be as righteous and holy as God pleases. “Go ahead, Lord. Bring it on!” Mention of “heaven” and “holiness” heightens the disparity between who we are and what God wants us to be and at the same time asserts God’s will to bridge that gap, to effect God’s will on earth as in heaven. God will not be trapped in heaven. We are not addressing some Unmoved Mover; we are asking for God’s active agency. We are moved from gnostic views of heaven as some blissful eternal destination to Matthew’s explicitly political Kingdom of Heaven. We are publicly pledging our allegiance, making a claim about power, reign, and sovereignty along with judgement , ending, and beginning. Before anything is asked from God or any assignment is given to us, the Lord’s Prayer prays for God to go ahead and be God. That raises a tricky question. Does God come in judgement or in mercy? Is God’s


    Page 37

    will done in the destruction of our economy, the bringing of our democracy into ill repute, the exposure of our historic racial divide? Or is God’s will enacted in the faithfulness of the health care workers, the Black Lives Matter movement, and big pharma’s invention of a vaccine? Since it’s God’s will being done, God’s kingdom coming, we can’t say for sure, can we? Are we at judgment or deliverance? Good Friday or Easter? “Your kingdom come” is the Lord’s Prayer at its most political, and many pastors are nervous about doing politics in church because of the contentious political divide in their congregations. Still, one of the reasons this pandemic has been so diffi cult to manage is that it has been so aggressively politicized. A mask becomes a pledge of allegiance. Who devises the vaccine and who gets the vaccine are functions of how we’ve distributed power in the kingdoms of this world. Thus, before the Lord’s Prayer moves to considerations of our collective mood or petitions related to human need, the prayer does politics: “Bring on your kingdom!” “Last week you were just stocking groceries at Food Lion,” preached one of my former students, Zoom-ing to his rural, Black congregation. “Now that COVID’s come to town, your job has become your vocation, your chance to work with Jesus. If somebody thanks you for showing up on the front lines or asks you why you are doing it, you tell ‘em Jesus sent you.” The politics of the Lord’s Prayer confronts the American church’s disastrous turn from kingdom concerns to inward, personal, individual problems. What God has in mind for our salvation is more than personal wellbeing. Whenever we hear truth preached, see a demon cast out, or somebody healed, Jesus says it’s a sign that “the kingdom of God has come near” (Mark 1:15). Implied in the petition for the coming kingdom is a hope that we’ll be given the good sense to see it when it does. Then the challenge: will we join in and join up? “Thy will be done” is not a sigh of resignation; it’s a war cry. We can’t bring in the kingdom, but we can hitch on to God’s kingdom coming. There are those who look upon the pandemic and fi nd reassurance in saying “God is in control.” Yet the prayer’s plea for the advent of the Kingdom is a reminder that we are not there yet. Not everything that happens is because God’s will is done on earth as in heaven. We wait, trusting Jesus’s promise, “I am working and my Father is working” (John 5:17). Many say, “Can’t wait for the world to get back to normal,” to which Christians, fed on Kingdom expectation, say, “God, I hope not.” Give us the bread we need for today. Plagues bring with them grief, fear, loss, trauma – none of which concern the Lord’s Prayer. Not until we are halfway through the prayer is human need mentioned. Is fulfi llment of human lack not the chief purpose of prayer in Jesus’ name? Maybe Jesus’ notion of our greatest need is different than ours? We crave freedom from anxiety, a sense of centeredness, or some other psycho-spiritual disposition. The fi rst petition is for the bodily need of bread. The pandemic, like any bodily illness, has reminded us that we are not the disembodied spiritual beings we wish we were. To pray “give us this day our daily bread” is to name our dependency. “Keep giving us our daily lives,” we pray with borrowed breath. We are more contingent than we can admit until a pandemic comes along, or the Lord’s Prayer is taught to us, and we are forced in spite of our evasions to admit that we’re fragile and utterly needy of something so mundane and material as bread.


    Page 38

    Note that we are to pray only for (suffi cient, enough, essential) daily bread. We’re praying for “our” daily bread, not mine. No bread nor health comes to us without the labor of strangers who are willing to care for us even though they are paid less than they ought. Whereas in Matthew, “give us the bread we need” implies “give us the bread today that we’ll need tomorrow,” Luke seems to say “give us each day the bread we need for that day.” Both have something to commend them in the Greek. My health is a relative, temporary, day-by-day contingency. Though I’m well today, eventually I shall not be, and that sickness shall, in one way or another, lead to my death. The plea for daily bread in a pandemic can remind us that our new sense of vulnerability is the daily situation for millions. I’m on the board for a wonderful organization, Rise Against Hunger. The board struggled with how we could continue our work during this pandemic until a member reminded us: nearly a million people (mostly children) die every month for lack of bread, pandemic or not. Forgive us for the ways we have wronged you, just as we also forgive those who have wronged us. Oh my. Augustine notes how, in his North African congregation, when people came to this petition in the Lord’s Prayer, they fell silent. He praised them for at least having the guts to admit that they had no intention of being true to “As we also forgive those who….” Gregory of Nyssa marvels that after the briefest mention of human want, and then only for our need for bread, the Lord’s Prayer quickly returns to what God wants from us.7 Jesus teaches us to dare to ask God for forgiveness and then risk trying forgiveness ourselves. To say “as we forgive” is to claim human agency, empowerment . So much of the prayer asks for that which only God can do; now we are given an assignment.8 While Donald Trump is mentally ill and therefore is not fully to be blamed for his sin, professional ethics prompts me to call down the wrath of God upon Albert Mohler, Eric Metaxas, and Franklin Graham for their support as Christians of the rascal. Then along comes Jesus with his prayer. I’m hoping that “as we also forgive those who have wronged us” is a future participle. In praying the Lord’s Prayer, we’re playing our bit parts in God’s restoration project of the whole creation, otherwise known as the Kingdom of Heaven. God’s Kingdom is coming to earth as it has come in Jesus. Do you want to be part of God’s kingdom, power, and glory? Take matters into your hands. Perform a revolutionary act of resistance: Go forgive somebody. And don’t lead us into temptation, but rescue us from the evil one. Depictions of the Christian life as sitting serenely in your backyard during a pandemic and attending to the birds are sentimental denials of evil. Sentimentality tempts us into thinking that once we’ve sighed deeply and shed a tear, we’ve actually done something in response to evil. The pandemic has been a temptation to fall face down in a mire of self-deceit: “We’ve done everything right and taken all precautions, even at our well-deserved family Christmas gathering in Vail”; “I can’t wear a mask for health reasons”; “We’ll be stronger because of this.” Plagues and lies go together. Woodrow Wilson was not known as a liar, but he lied about the 1918 pandemic, and in so doing made it worse. In 1918, increased numbers of people turned toward religion — and got over it as soon as the pandemic ended. The nascent public health service strove heroically — and received death threats and


    Page 39

    protests for their trouble.9A pandemic in 1918 or 2020 is thus a wonderful opportunity to pray “Lead us not into temptation.” The kingdoms of this world rarely give up power without a fi ght. When Jesus was alone in the wilderness, he was tempted; so are we. Lead us not into asking You to end the pandemic when we are unwilling to wear a mask. Preserve us from the temptation to pray, “Lord, please heal Rev. Jones from COVID,” even though we failed to pray three months ago, “Lord, please give Rev. Jones the strength to stand up to those in his congregation who are demanding in-person worship no matter what the Governor has ordered.” Which leads us to the most striking thing to be learned by praying the Lord’s Prayer in a pandemic. The shock is not in what Christ tells us to pray for, but in what he doesn’t: Throughout the Lord’s Prayer, there’s no mention of sickness or death. There are petitions for bread, for the guts to forgive as we have been forgiven, and for deliverance from evil, but not for a good immune system. In most of our churches, the weekly “Prayer List” contains nothing but petitions for healing from illness, recovery from medical procedures, and for salvation from the ravages of the predictable physical deterioration of older adults like me. Rarely is God’s healing help besought for anyone outside the congregation. Prayer has become a last resort plea for God to fi x the only thing we can’t – liberation from our bodies and uninterrupted continuance of our biological lives. Early Christians were once regarded as weird because they believed that death isn’t the worst that can happen to us.10 Judging from our prayers, fear of sickness and death is the sole motive for prayer. As every pastor knows, people in pain, in extremis, can be, well, a pain. Fear does not bring out the best in us. When we – or someone we love – are sick, we fi nd ourselves incapable of thinking beyond the present threats to the self. This natural human tendency becomes particularly debilitating in a self-absorbed culture where churches have colluded with the world by encouraging people to believe that “wellness ” is the point of life, that it’s okay to have no other project than the well-being of ourselves and our families. By teaching us what to pray for, Jesus disciplines our conversations with God so that we might learn to care for what God cares about, seeking fi rst the Kingdom of Heaven rather than help propping up our bogus realms and false means of salvation. It’s the Lord’s Prayer, not ours, whereby the Lord makes room for us to think about something other than ourselves. For a few blessed moments we are free from being jerked around by a pitiless pandemic. Taking time to “pray like this,” we thereby give the Lord time to wrench our lives out of the grip of the present moment. Christ outflanks the sovereignty that we might be tempted to bestow upon this virus. Given the long view, time taken out of the hands of the pandemic, and our current struggles set in the context of God’s ultimate purposes for God’s beloved creation, we are free, we can breathe. More than banal reassurance that “We will get through this,” we are enabled to pray with conviction that God refuses to give up on us or on the world that God tenaciously loves. As the prayer acclaims, God is getting and fi nally will get what God wants. Only God is eternal. God will not allow this pandemic to determine the ultimate signifi cance of our lives. God is more decisive than a plague. Christ binds the strong man (Matthew 12:29) and robs evil of its capacity to lord over us. No plague


    Page 40

    determines the world’s possibilities. Only God does that. In being taught by Jesus to name our situation truthfully, our context is changed. The Lord’s Prayer moves us from our quite understandable preoccupation with this deadly virus to a surprising acclamation of the rule of Christ. That changes how we live in the present moment. We can lift up our heads, having been given that which we knew not how to ask: “The assurance of things hoped for and the conviction of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1). We used to cue our congregations for the Lord’s Prayer with “Therefore we are bold to pray as we have been taught….” Maybe our problem is not that we have asked too much of God but that we have asked too little. Our intercession is for healing in this moment when Jesus taught us to go ahead and risk praying for the onslaught of the Kingdom of Heaven. Christianity is not so much a set of beliefs that we must affi rm. It is more nearly a prayer that we must learn, with the expectation that in praying this prayer, we shall become as we pray. Thus, memorization of this prayer is the essential survival skill for Christians.11 It takes Jesus just a few minutes to teach us his prayer, but for most of us, it takes a lifetime to pray the Lord’s Prayer by heart. The self-deception, false hopes, anger, willful ignorance, economic injustice, public health crisis, and mortal fear people are experiencing are not peculiar to this pandemic. Thusly it was in 1918 and shall be in 2021. Yet this can be the greatest opportunity of our ministries for us preachers to rediscover our core identity and to exercise our unique calling by telling the truth about God and ourselves, egged on by Jesus. “When you pray say….”

    Notes 1 “Everybody prays whether he thinks of it as praying or not. The odd silence you fall into when something very beautiful is happening or something very good or very bad. The ah-h-h-h! that sometimes fl oats up out of you…. Whatever words or sounds you use for sighing over your own life. These are all prayers in their own way.” Frederick Buechner, Wishful Thinking: A Theological A,B,C (San Francisco: C Harper & Row), 1973, 79. 2 Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Psalms: The Prayer Book of the Bible (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1970), 9. 3 Bonhoeffer, Psalms, 10. 4 Bonhoeffer, Psalms, 15. 5 Benjamin Fearnow, “‘I’m Listening to God, Not the WHO’: Pastor Robert Jeffress Rejects Holiday Restrictions,” Newsweek (Newsweek, November 22, 2020), https://www.newsweek.com/im-listeninggod -not-who-pastor-robert-jeffress-rejects-holiday-restrictions-1549317. 6 Lawrence Wright, “The Plague Year: The Mistakes and the Struggles Behind America’s Corona Virus Tragedy,” The New Yorker, December 28, 2020. 7St. Gregory of Nyssa, The Lord’s Prayer and the Beatitudes, trans. Hilda Graef, no 18 in The Ancient Christian Writers, London, Longman, 1954. 8 Origen asks why we inform God in prayer when God already knows what we need. Though God knows, God elects to work out God’s purposes through our responsive words and deeds, including our prayers. When we pray, we join in God’s action in the world by praying and doing what we can to be part of the working out of God’s will for the world. When we pray this prayer, we’re all priests. As we say out loud who’s in charge, we become part of God’s coaxing of the world toward God’s intent. Origen, “On Prayer” quoted by Rowan Williams, Being Christian: Baptism, Bible, Eucharist, Prayer (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company), 2014. 9 Nicholas A. Christakis, Apollo’s Arrow: The Profound and Enduring Impact of Coronavirus on the Way We Live (Little, Brown Spark: New York, 2020). 10 “During one of the two plagues that early Christians faced (c. 250-60), Christians saw the plagues as


    Page 41

    an opportunity for witness and ministry. In Alexandria, Bishop Dionysius reported that in the attempt to avoid the plague, pagans ‘would thrust away even those who were just beginning to become diseased,’ that they ‘fl ed from their loved ones….’ The Christians, by contrast, ‘visited the sick unprotected, assiduously serving them, tending them in Christ’ (letter cited in Eusebius, HE, 7.22). “’In this manner,’ he continues, ‘the best of our brothers departed this life’” (cf. C. Kavin Rowe, Christianity’s Surprise: A Sure and Certain Hope [Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2020], 73-75). Christians pray in a way that enables them not only to care for the sick but also as those who do not fear death because they pray in the name of one who has defeated death. 11 William H. Willimon and Stanley Hauerwas, Lord, Teach Us: The Lord’s Prayer and the Christian Life (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996), 17.

  • Ethics in Conversation: A Festschrift in Honor of Donald W. Shriver, Jr., 13th President of Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York

    This text was converted from the original print edition for full-text searchability. Formatting may differ from the original. Consult the PDF for citation and presentation details.

    Page 65

    Pentecost 2021

    One New Book for the Preacher

    Ronald C. White, Pasadena, California

    Penquin Random House Speakers Bureau

    Isaac B. Sharp and Christian T. Iosso, eds., Ethics in Conversation: A Festschrift in Honor of Donald W. Shriver, Jr., 13th President of Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2020)

    The Journal for Preachers has published essays by Don Shriver over the years. Now, fi ttingly, the life and contributions of this parish and campus pastor, university professor, scholar in social ethics, activist, seminary president, ecumenical leader, and author come into full view in a Festschrift that will treat and tantalize ministers. The Festschrift convenes a conversation on Christian ethics where we hear past and present Union faculty, other colleagues and friends, and Pulitzer Prize-winning Yale historian David W. Blight. Together they describe the challenges Shriver faced while leading Union for sixteen years as president from 1975 to 1991. But this is much more than a book of institutional memory. It is the story of a man who, in the words of his Yale mentor H. Richard Niebuhr, encourages all of us in the continuing “moral act of self-defi nition.” Born in 1927 in Norfolk, Virginia, Shriver grew up in a segregated neighborhood and school structure. His father, holding strong “states’ rights” beliefs, opposed civil rights marches and legislation. Young Shriver’s involvement in the Presbyterian Church opened an alternative vision of Christian faith. In 1950, he was elected national moderator of the Youth Council of the Presbyterian Church, U.S. In 1951, he was elected chair of the United Christian Youth Movement, where he met Peggy Ann Leu, his future wife. Shriver received his education at Davidson College (1951), Union Theological Seminary in Richmond (1955), and Yale University (1957), and earned a Ph.D. from Harvard in 1962. He served as pastor of Linwood Presbyterian Church in Gastonia, North Carolina, from 1956 to 59, and university minister at North Carolina State University from 1963 to 1972. The position at Raleigh morphed into a dual role in teaching, where he encouraged students to integrate theology and ethics with contemporary events. In 1972 he became professor of ethics and society at Emory University. Shriver was invited to become Union Seminary New York’s thirteenth president in 1975. Union historian Gary Dorrien writes, “Shriver was well aware that Union was said to be in a death spiral, because Union’s inner turmoil and fi nancial disarray were very publicly known.” The Seminary had fi red its twelfth president, and the candidate fi rst offered the thirteenth presidency “turned it down after judging the school was ungovernable.” In the mid-seventies, Union was struggling to navigate a changing church and culture after the seminary’s halcyon years of Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich. In Shriver’s inaugural address, he posed the question: “How does the love of truth serve the truth of love?” This is a timeless question for ministers in every generation. In this Festschrift, multiple angles of vision shed light on Don (and Peggy) Shriver.


    Page 66

    Journal for Preachers Larry Rasmussen remembers how he “gave vitality to campus spiritualities the likes of which Union had not known and would not have imagined.” Cornell West mused, “Is it ironic that Donald Shriver—this son of the White South—would convene such a group of Black scholars and Christians in late twentieth century New York City?” Janet Walton describes Shriver’s encouragement for the reconfi guring of worship in James Chapel. Phyllis Trible writes, “We remember with gratitude the striving for women during the presidency of Donald Shriver.” An apple of gold for ministers is the essay by Dean K. Thompson, pastor and former President of Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary. In “An Unsilent Southerner and Colleagues Confront the Scourge of Racism,” Thompson captures Shriver as a model for ministers seeking to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ in today’s tumultuous culture. During Thompson’s senior year in Richmond, he recounts a Social Ethics seminar taught by Shriver as a visiting professor. Shriver asked, “What can you do to cultivate ethical refl ection in congregations?” He wanted these future ministers to encourage members to think theologically about the intersection of church and society in their communities. The visiting professor cautioned not to provide answers but rather to offer in their preaching and teaching the elements of decision-making. Thompson remembers Shriver “challenged us to yearn for a faith that equipped us for change instead of a faith that protected us from change.” He charged the class members to lead the church as a “headlight” rather than a “taillight.” Shriver’s life journey contains many signposts for today’s minister. He lived his theology. He joined labor union members in a picket line in Gastonia. He marched in Selma in 1965. Because of his participation in the march, some Presbyterian elders attempted to have him fi red from his campus ministry position at North Carolina State University. In his fi rst book The Unsilent South: Prophetic Preaching in Racial Crisis, an edited volume of sermons, he reminds preachers to be conscious of the racism in themselves. Embarking on prophetic preaching, Shriver learned early he needed to travel this road with others. The Rev. J. Randolph “Randy” Taylor, pastor of Washington D.C.’s Church of the Pilgrims from 1956 until 1967, who became the fi rst moderator of the reunited Presbyterian Church U.S.A. in 1983, became Shriver’s friend and partner in ministry and civil rights activism. In Honest Patriots: Loving a County Enough to Remember Its Misdeeds (2005), which won the prestigious Grawemeyer Award in Religion, Shriver focused on Germany and South Africa as models for the task of “mastering” destructive pasts. He then treated our negative treatment of African Americans and Native Americans in a call for a self-critical vision of American citizenship. He wrote, “Some Americans are learning to offer each other more honest versions of our national history than many of us were taught as children.” In retrospect, living half of his life in the South and half in the North, Shriver continually relied on the counsel of African-American and female colleagues to navigate new challenges to the church. In our challenging moment, the faith odyssey of Don Shriver can help illuminate the preacher’s task.